A functional approach to movement analysis and error identification in sports and physical education

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 6, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Hossner, Ernst Joachim ^a   Schiebl, Frank ^b   Göhner, Ulrich ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

augmented feedback; basic action concepts; constraints; dynamical systems; internal models; modularity; movement science; task analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84987989965     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01339     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bernstein N. A. (1947/1996). On dexterity its development, in Dexterity and its Development, eds Latash M. L. Turvey M. T. (Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum), 1–235.
2. Bläsing B. Schack T. (2012). Mental representation of spatial movement parameters in dance. Spat. Cogn. Comput. 12, 111–131. 10.1080/13875868.2011.626095
3. Bril B. Smaers J. Steele J. Rezin R. Nonaka T. Dietrich G. et al. (2012). Functional mastery of percussive technology in nut cracking and stone flaking: experimental data and implication for the human brain. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Biol. 367, 59–74. 10.1098/rstb.2011.014722106427
4. Drill R. (1933). Der Hammerschlag [The hammer stroke]. Neue Psychol. Stud. 9, 142–163. 20955249
5. Fodor J. (1983). The Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MITPress.
6. Göhner U. (1974). Zur strukturanalyse sportmotorischer fertigkeiten [On structural analysis of motor skills in sports]. Sportwissenschaft 4, 115–135. 10.1007/BF03178832
7. Göhner U. (1975a). Lehren nach funktionsphasen. Theoretische grundlegung [Teaching on the basis of functional phases. Theoretical foundation]. Sportunterricht 24, 4–8.
8. Göhner U. (1975b). Lehren nach funktionsphasen. Praktische konsequenzen [Teaching on the basis of functional phases. Practical consequences]. Sportunterricht 24, 45–50.
9. Göhner U. (1979). Bewegungsanalyse im Sport [Movement Analysis in Sports]. Schorndorf: Hofmann.
10. Göhner U. (1992). Einführung in die Bewegungslehre des Sports. Teil 1: Die Sportlichen Bewegungen [Introduction to Movement Science of Sports. Part 1: Movements in Sports]. Schorndorf: Hofmann.
11. Göhner U. (2013). Sportliche Bewegungen erfolgreich analysieren [Achieving Movement Analysis in Sports]. Tübingen: Eigenverlag.
12. Greenwald A. G. (1970). Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: with special reference to the ideomotor mechanism. Psychol. Rev. 77, 73–99. 10.1037/h00286895454129
13. Heinen T. (2005). Mentale Repräsentationen und Kinematik von Bewegungen: Ein interdisziplinärer Ansatz zur Analyse strukturfunktionaler Zusammenhänge der Bewegungsorganisation [Mental Representations and Movement Kinematics: An Interdisciplinary Approach to the Analysis of Structural-functional Interrelations of Movement Organisation]. Norderstedt: Diplomica.
14. Hossner E.-J. (1995). Module der Motorik [Motor Modules]. Schorndorf: Hofmann.
15. Hossner E.-J. (2004). Bewegende Ereignisse [Moving Events]. Schorndorf: Hofmann.
16. James W. (1981/1890). The Principles of Psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17. Kunde W. (2001). Response-effect compatibility in manual choice reaction tasks. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 27, 387–394. 10.1037/0096-1523.27.2.38711318054
18. Kunde W. Koch I. Hoffmann J. (2004). Anticipated action effects affect the selection, initiation, and execution of actions. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 57A, 87–106. 10.1080/0272498034300014314681005
19. Magill R. A. (1998). Knowledge is more than we can talk about: implicit learning in motor skill acquisition. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 69, 104–110. 10.1080/02701367.1998.106076769635325
20. Meijer O. G. Roth K. (1988). (Eds.). Complex Movement Behaviour. The Motor-action Controversy. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
21. Newell K. M. (1989). On task and theory specificity. J. Motor Behav. 21, 92–96. 10.1080/00222895.1989.1073546715117675
22. Newell K. M. Jordan K. (2007). Task constraints and movement organization: a common language, in Ecological Task Analysis and Movement, eds Davis W. E. Broadhead G. D. (Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics), 5–23.
23. Parry R. Dietrich G. Bril B. (2014). Tool use ability depends in understanding of the functional dynamics and not specific joint contribution profiles. Front. Psychol. 5:306. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.0030624795669
24. Prinz W. (1987). Ideo-motor action, in Perspectives on Perception and Action, eds Heuer H. Sanders A. F. (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum), 47–76.
25. Schack T. (2004). The cognitive architecture of complex movement. Int. J. Sport Exerc. 2, 403–438. 10.3389/fnsys.2014.0011325803512
26. Schack T. (2010). Die Kognitive Architektur Menschlicher Bewegungen [The Cognitive Architecture of Human Movements]. Aachen: Meyer & Meyer.
27. Schack T. (2012). Measuring mental representations, in Measurement in Sport and Exercise Psychology, eds Tenenbaum G. Eklund R. C. Kamata A. (Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics), 203–214.
28. Schiebl F. (2008). Force-Feedback unter Besonderer Berücksichtigung Interner Modelle [Force Feedback in Particular Consideration of Internal Models]. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
29. Schmidt R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychol. Rev. 82, 225–260. 10.1037/h007677014768838
30. Thoroughman K. A. Shadmehr R. (2000). Learning of action through adaptive combination of motor primitives. Nature 407, 742–747. 10.1038/3503758811048720
31. Van der Kamp J. Vereijken B. Savelsbergh G. (1996). Physical and informational constraints in the coordination and control of human movement. Corpus Psyche Soc. 3, 102–118. 23099793
32. Wolpert D. M. Ghahramani Z. Jordan M. (1995). An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science 269, 1880–1882. 10.1126/science.75699317569931
33. Wolpert D. M. Kawato M. (1998). Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural Netw. 11, 1317–1329. 10.1016/S0893-6080(98)00066-512662752