Improving media measurement: Evidence from the field

Political Communication

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 408-420

  Lacour, Michael J ^a   Vavreck, Lynn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

ANES; Media; Mutz; Prior

Indexed keywords

EID: 84987942201     PISSN: 10584609     EISSN: 10917675     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10584609.2014.921258     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Ansolabehere, S. D., & Iyengar, S. (1998). Messages forgotten: Misreporting in surveys and the bias toward minimal effects. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Los Angeles
2. Bartels, L. M. (1993). Messages received: The political impact of media exposure. American Political Science Review, 87, 267-285
3. Chaffee, S. H., & Schleuder, J. (1986). Measurement and effects of attention to media news. Human Communication Research, 13, 76-107
4. Dilliplane, S., Goldman, S. K., & Mutz, D. C. (2013). Televised exposure to politics: New measures for a fragmented media environment. American Journal of Political Science, 57, 236-248
5. Fiske, M., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1945). The Columbia Office of Radio Research. Hollywood Quarterly, 1, 51-59
6. Fowler, E. F., Goldstein, K. M., Hale, M., & Kaplan, M. (2007). Law of democracy: Does local news measure up? Stanford Law & Policy Review, 18, 410-438
7. Gilliam, F. D., Jr., & Iyengar, S. (2000). Prime suspects: The influence of local television news on the viewing public. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 560-573
8. Goldman, S. K., Mutz, D. C., & Dilliplane, S. (2013). All virtue is relative: A response to Prior. Political Communication, 30, 635-653
9. Hale, M., Fowler, E. F., & Goldstein, K. M. (2007). Capturing multiple markets: A new method of capturing and analyzing local television news. Electronic News, 1, 227-243
10. Jackman, S. D., LaCour, M. J., Lewis, J. B., & Vavreck, L. (2012). Digital fingerprints: A new method for measuring political advertising. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
11. Johnston, R., & Brady, H. E. (2002). The rolling cross-section design. Electoral Studies, 21, 283-295.
12. LaCour, M. J. (2013, August). A balanced news diet, not selective exposure: Results from Erie to Arbitron. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
13. Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1944). The people’s choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign (2nd ed.) New York, NY: Duell Sloan and Pearce.
14. Price, V. & Zaller, J. (1993). Who gets the news? Alternative measures of news reception and their implications for research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57, 133-164
15. Prior, M. (2009a). The immensely inflated news audience: Assessing bias in self-reported news exposure. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73, 130-143
16. Prior, M. (2009b). Improving media effects research through better measurement of news exposure. Journal of Politics, 71, pp. 893-908
17. Prior, M. (2013a). The challenge of measuring media exposure: Reply to Dilliplane, Goldman, and Mutz. Political Communication, 30, 620-634
18. Prior, M. (2013b). Meda and political polarization. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 101-127
19. Vavreck, L. (2007). The exaggerated effects of advertising on turnout: The dangers of self-reports. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 2, 325-343.