The role of agency in historians’ experiences of serendipity in physical and digital information environments

Journal of Documentation

Volumn 72, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 1008-1026

  Martin, Kim ^a   Quan Haase, Anabel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Academic libraries; Browsing; Historians; Historical research process; History; Information seeking; Serendipity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84987875887     PISSN: 00220418     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/JD-11-2015-0144     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Abbott, A. (2008), “The traditional future: a computational theory of library”, College & Research Libraries, Vol. 69 No. 6, pp. 524-545.
2. Agarwal, N.K. (2015), “Towards a definition of serendipity in information behaviour”, Information Research, Vol. 20 No. 3, available at: www.informationr.net/ir/20-3/paper675.html#.Vwe2RxIrL3A
3. Berg, B.L. (2007), Qualitative Research Methods, Pearson, Boston, MA.
4. Björneborn, L. (2008), “Serendipity dimensions and users’ information behaviour in the physical library interface”, Information Research, Vol. 13 No. 4.
5. Blandford, A., Rimmer, J. and Warwick, C. (2006), “Experiences of the library in the digital age”, 3rd International Conference “Cultural Convergence and Digital Technology”, Tavros, November 23-26.
6. Brundage, A. (2008), Going to the Sources: A Guide to Historical Research and Writing, 4th ed., Harlan Davidson Inc., Wheeling, IL.
7. Cantor, N.F. and Schneider, R.I. (1967), How to Study History, Thomas Y. Crowell Company, New York, NY.
8. Carr, P.L. (2015), “Serendipity in the stacks: libraries, information architecture, and the problems of accidental discovery”, College & Research Libraries, Vol. 76 No. 6, pp. 831-842.
9. Case, D.O. (1986), “Collection and organization of written information by social scientists and humanists: a review and exploratory study”, Journal of Information Science, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 97-104.
10. Case, D.O. (1991), “The collection and use of information by some American historians: a study of motives and methods”, The Library Quarterly, Vol. 61 No. 1, pp. 61-82.
11. Charmaz, K. (2006), Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis, Sage Publications, London.
12. Corbin, J. and Strauss, A. (2008), Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
13. Delgadillo, R. and Lynch, B.P. (1999), “Future historians: their quest for information”, College & Research Libraries, Vol. 60 No. 3, pp. 245-259.
14. Duff, W.M. and Johnson, C.A. (2002), “Accidentally found on purpose: information-seeking behavior of historians in archives”, The Library Quarterly, Vol. 72 No. 4, pp. 472-496.
15. Erdelez, S. (1999), “Information encountering: it’s more than just bumping into information”, Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science, February/March, pp. 25-29.
16. Foster, A. and Ford, N. (2003), “Serendipity and information seeking: an empirical study”, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 59 No. 3, pp. 321-340.
17. Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. (1967), The Discovery Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Inquiry, Aldine, Chicago.
18. Glesne, C. and Peshkin, A. (1992), Becoming Qualitative Researchers, Longman, White Plains, NY.
19. Graham, S., Milligan, I. and Weingart, S. (2014), The Historian’s Macroscope: Big Digital History, Imperial College Press, London, available at: http://themacroscope.org
20. Hinze, A., McKay, D., Vanderschantz, N., Timpany, C. and Cunningham, S.J. (2012), “Book selection behavior in the physical library: implications for ebook collections”, Proceedings of the 12th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL ’12), p. 305.
21. Hoeflich, M.H. (2007), “Serendipity in the stacks, fortuity in the archives*”, Law Library Journal, Vol. 99 No. 4, pp. 813-827.
22. Iaquinta, L., Gemmis, M., De, Lops, P., Semeraro, G., Filannino, M. and Molino, P. (2008), “Introducing serendipity in a content-based recommender system”, IEEE Eighth International Conference on Hybrid Intelligent Systems, Barcelona, September 10-12, available at: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=4626624 (accessed August 24, 2016).
23. Kemman, M., Kleppe, M. and Scagliola, S. (2013), Just Google it Digital Research Practices of Humanities Scholars, arXiv preprint arXiv:1309.2434.
24. Kirsch, G.E. and Rohan, L. (2008), Beyond the Archives: Research as a Lived Process, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, IL.
25. Liestman, D. (1992), “Chance in the midst of design: approaches to library research serendipity”, Research Quarterly, Vol. 31 No. 4, pp. 524-532.
26. Lundy, K.S. (2008), “Historical research”, in Given, L.M. (Ed.), Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods, Sage, Los Angeles, CA, pp. 395-399.
27. McCay-Peet, L. (2013), “Investigating work-related serendipity, what influences it, and how it may be facilitated in digital environments”, doctoral dissertation, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia.
28. McCay-Peet, L. and Toms, E.G. (2010), “The process of serendipity in knowledge work”, Proceeding of the Third Symposium on Information Interaction in Context, ACM, New York, NY, August, pp. 377-382.
29. McCay-Peet, L. and Toms, E.G. (2015), “Investigating serendipity: how it unfolds and what may influence it”, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 66 No. 7, pp. 1463-1476.
30. McClellan, J.E. III (2005), “Accident, luck, and serendipity in historical research”, Proceedings of The American Philosophical Society, Vol. 149 No. 1, pp. 1-21.
31. McKay, D., Smith, W. and Chang, S. (2014), “Lend me some sugar: borrowing rates of neighbouring books as evidence for browsing”, Digital Libraries, London, September 8-12, available at: http://researchbank.swinburne.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/swin:40241 (accessed August 24, 2016).
32. Makri, S., Toms, E.G., McCay-Peet, L. and Blandford, A. (2011), “Encouraging serendipity in interactive systems: an introduction”, Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on encouraging serendipity in interactive systems. 13th IFIP TC13 Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Springer-Verlag, Lisbon.
33. Makri, S. and Blandford, A. (2012), “Coming across information serendipitously - part 1: a process model”, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 68 No. 5, pp. 684-705, available at: www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=17051067
34. Makri, S., Blandford, A., Woods, M., Sharples, S. and Maxwell, D. (2014), “‘Making my own luck’: serendipity strategies and how to support them in digital information environments”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 65 No. 11, pp. 2179-2194.
35. Martin, K. and Quan-Haase, A. (2013), “Are e-books replacing print Books? Tradition, serendipity, and opportunity in the adoption and use of e-books for historical research and teaching”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 64 No. 5, pp. 1016-1028.
36. Martin, K., Greenspan, B. and Quan-Haase, A. (2014), “STAK - serendipitous tool for augmenting knowledge: bridging gaps between digital and physical resources”, Digital Humanities. Lausanne, available at: http://dharchive.org/paper/DH2014/Paper-314.xml
37. Merton, R.K. and Barber, E. (2004), The Travels and Adventures of Serendipity: A Study in Sociological Semantics and the Sociology of Science, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
38. OED (2015), “Serendipity, n.”, OED Online, June, Oxford University Press, available at: www.oed.com.proxy1.lib.uwo.ca/view/Entry/176387?redirectedFrom=serendipity& (accessed August 24, 2016).
39. Quan-Haase, A. and McCay-Peet, L. (2014), “The new boundaries of search: serendipity in digital environments”, in Stark, B., Dörr, D. and Aufenange, S. (Eds), The Googlization of Information Search: Search Engines in the Tension Between Use and Regulation, De Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 136-159.
40. Race, T.M. (2012), “Resource discovery tools: supporting serendipity”, in Popp, M.P. and McCay-Dallis, D. (Eds), Planning and Implementing Resource Discovery Tools in Academic Libraries, DLTS Faculty Publications, IGI Global, Hershey, pp. 139-152, available at: http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/dlts_fac_pub/22/ (accessed August 24, 2016).
41. Rädle, R., Weiler, A., Huber, S., Jetter, H., Mansmann, S., Reiterer, H. and Scholl, M.H. (2012), eBook Meets Top: Using Collaborative Visualization for Search and Serendipity in On-line Book Repositories, ACM, Maui, HI, pp. 2-5.
42. Ramsay, S. (2014), “The hermeneutics of screwing around ; or what you do with a million books”, in Kee, K. (Ed.), PastPlay: Teaching and Learning with Technology, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI, pp. 111-120.
43. Rice, R.E., McCreadie, M. and Chang, S.-J.L. (2001), Accessing and Browsing Information and Communication, MIT Press, Boston, MA, available at: http://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10142
44. Ridge, M., Croxall, B., Papaelias, A. and Kleinman, S. (2014), "Play as process and product: on making Serendip-o-matic", Digital Humanities. Lausanne, available at: http://dharchive.org/paper/DH2014/Paper-848.xml
45. Rimmer, J., Warwick, C., Blandford, A., Gow, J. and Buchanan, G. (2008), “An examination of the physical and the digital qualities of humanities research”, Information Processing & Management, Vol. 44 No. 3, pp. 1374-1392.
46. Rosenzweig, R. (2001), “The road to Xanadu: public and private pathways on the history web”, Organization, Vol. 88 No. 2, pp. 548-579.
47. Rubin, V.L., Burkell, J. and Quan-Haase, A. (2011), “Facets of serendipity in everyday chance encounters: a grounded theory approach to blog analysis”, Information Research, Vol. 16 No. 3, available at: http://informationr.net/ir/16-3/paper488.html
48. Scott, J.W. (2011), “Storytelling”, History and Theory, Vol. 50 No. 1, pp. 203-209.
49. Solberg, J. (2012), “Googling the archive: digital tools and the practice of history”, Advances in the History of Rhetoric, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 53-76.
50. Strauss, A. (1987), Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
51. Stone, S. (1982), “Humanities scholars: information needs and uses”, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 38 No. 4, pp. 292-313.
52. Sun, X., Sharples, S. and Makri, S. (2011), “A user-cent red mobile diary study approach to understanding serendipity in information research”, Information Research, Vol. 16 No. 3, available at: www.informationr.net/ir/16-3/paper492.html
53. Thudt, A., Hinrichs, U. and Carpendale, S. (2012), “The Bohemian bookshelf supporting serendipitous discoveries through visualization”, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’12, Austin, Texas. May 5-10.
54. Toms, E.G. and O’Brien, H.L. (2008), “Understanding the information and communication technology needs of the e-humanist”, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 64 No. 1, pp. 102-130.
55. van Andel, P. (1994), “Anatomy of the unsought finding. serendipity: origin, history, domains, traditions, appearances, patterns and programmability”, British Journal of Philosophical Science, Vol. 45, pp. 631-648.
56. Woolwine, D.E. (2014), “Collection development in the humanities and social sciences in a transitional age: deaccession of print items”, Library Philosophy and Practice, No. 1173.