Investigating serendipity: How it unfolds and what may influence it

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 66, Issue 7, 2015, Pages 1463-1476

  McCay Peet, Lori ^a   Toms, Elaine G ^b  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

information models; qualitative research

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL SPACES; FOLLOW UP; INFORMATION MODELS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEWS; SINGLE MODELS; WORK-RELATED;

EID: 84946196385     PISSN: 23301635     EISSN: 23301643     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.23273     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Barber, B., &, Fox, R.C., (1958). The case of the floppy-eared rabbits: An instance of serendipity gained and serendipity lost. The American Journal of Sociology, 64 (2), 128-136.
2. Björneborn, L., (2008). Serendipity dimensions and users' information behaviour in the physical library interface. Information Research, 13 (4), paper 370. Retireved from http://www.informationr.net/ir/13-4/paper370.html
3. Boden, M.A., (1999). Computer models of creativity. In, R.J. Sternberg, (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 351-372). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
4. Braun, V., &, Clarke, V., (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2), 77-101.
5. Buckland, M., (1991). Information as thing. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 42 (5), 351-360.
6. Campanario, J., (1996). Using citation classics to study the incidence of serendipity in scientific discovery. Scientometrics, 37 (1), 3-24.
7. Chen, S.Y., Magoulas, G.D., &, Dimakopoulos, D., (2005). A flexible interface design for Web directories to accommodate different cognitive styles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56 (1), 70-83.
8. Cunha, M.P.E., (2005). Serendipity: Why some organizations are luckier than others. FEUNL Working Paper no. 472. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.882782
9. Dantonio, L., Makri, S., &, Blandford, A., (2012). Coming across academic social media content serendipitously. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 49 (1), 1-10.
10. Dervin, B., &, Foreman-Wernet, L., (2003). Sense-making methodology reader: Selected writings of Brenda Dervin. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
11. Duff, W.M., &, Johnson, C.A., (2002). Accidentally found on purpose: Information-seeking behavior of historians in archives. The Library Quarterly, 72 (4), 472-496.
12. Eco, U., (1998). Serendipities: Language & lunacy. New York: Columbia University Press.
13. Ellis, D., (2005). Ellis's model of information seeking behaviour. In, K.E. Fisher, S. Erdelez, &, L. McKechnie, (Eds.), Theories of information behaviour (pp. 138-142). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
14. Erdelez, S., (2005). Information encountering. In, K.E. Fisher, S. Erdelez, &, L. McKechnie, (Eds.), Theories of information behavior (pp. 179-185). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
15. Fine, G.A., &, Deegan, J.G., (1996). Three principles of Serendip: Insight, chance, and discovery in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 9 (4), 434-447.
16. Foster, A., &, Ford, N., (2003). Serendipity and information seeking: An empirical study. Journal of Documentation, 59 (3), 321-340.
17. Guest, G., Bunce, A., &, Johnson, L., (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18 (1), 59-82.
18. Heinström, J., (2006). Psychological factors behind incidental information acquisition. Library and Information Science Research, 28 (4), 579-594.
19. Ingwersen, P., &, Järvelin, K., (2005). The turn: Integration of information seeking and retrieval in context. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
20. Lenox, R.S., (1985). Educating for the serendipitous discovery. Journal of Chemical Education, 62 (4), 282-285.
21. Liestman, D., (1992). Chance in the midst of design: Approaches to librarian research serendipity. Research Quarterly, 31 (4), 524-532.
22. Luxford, J.M., (2009). An English chronicle entry on Robin Hood. Journal of Medieval History, 35 (1), 70-76.
23. Makri, S., &, Blandford, A., (2012). Coming across information serendipitously: Part 1: A process model. Journal of Documentation, 68 (5), 684-705.
24. Manning, K., (1997). Authenticity in constructivist inquiry: Methodological considerations without prescription. Qualitative Inquiry, 3 (1), 93-115.
25. Marchionini, G., (2010). Information concepts: From books to cyberspace identities. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool.
26. Martin, K., &, Quan-Haase, A., (2013). Are e-books substituting print books? Tradition, serendipity, and opportunity in the adoption and use of e-books for historical research and teaching. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 64 (5), 1016-1028.
27. th Annual BCS Interaction Specialist Group Conference on People and Computers (pp. 357-362). British Computer Society. Retrieved from http://ewic.bcs.org/content/ConWebDoc/47823
28. McBirnie, A., (2008). Seeking serendipity: The paradox of control. Aslib Proceedings, 60 (6), 600-618.
29. McCay-Peet, L., (2013). Investigating work-related serendipity, what influences it, and how it may be facilitated in digital environments. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. Retrieved from http://dalspace.library.dal.ca/handle/10222/42727
30. McCay-Peet, L., &, Toms, E.G., (2010). The process of serendipity in knowledge work. In Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Information Interaction in Context (pp. 377-382). New York, NY: ACM Press. doi: 10.1145/1840784.1840842
31. Merton, R.K., &, Barber, E., (2004). The travels and adventures of serendipity: A study in sociological semantics and the sociology of science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32. Pálsdõttir, Á., (2011). Opportunistic discovery of information by elderly Icelanders and their relatives. Information Research, 16 (3), paper 485. Retrieved from http://www.informationr.net/ir/16-3/paper485.html
33. Rubin, V.L., Burkell, J., &, Quan-Haase, A., (2011). Facets of serendipity in everyday chance encounters: a grounded theory approach to blog analysis. Information Research, 16 (3), paper 488. Retrieved form http://www.informationr.net/ir/16-3/paper488.html
34. Sawaizumi, S., Katai, O., Kawakami, H., &, Shiose, T., (2007, November). Using the concept of serendipity in education. Paper presented at the KICSS 2007: The Second International Conference on Knowledge, Information and Creativity Support Systems, Nomi, Ishikawa, Japan. Retrieved from https://dspace.jaist.ac.jp/dspace/handle/10119/4087
35. Schmidt, A., (2000). Impicit human computer interaction through context. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 4 (2), 191-199.
36. Simon, H.A., (1971). Designing organizations for an information-rich world. In, M. Greenberger, (Ed.), Computers, communications, and the public interest (pp. 37-72). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
37. Sun, X., Sharples, S., &, Makri, S., (2011). A user-centred mobile diary study approach to understanding serendipity in information research. Information Research, 16 (3), paper 492. Retrieved from http://www.informationr.net/ir/16-3/paper492.html
38. Thudt, A., Hinrichs, U., &, Carpendale, S., (2012). The bohemian bookshelf. In, J. Kjeldskov, &, M.B. Skov, (Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1461-1470). New York, NY: ACM Press. doi: 10.1145/2207676.2208607
39. Toms, E.G., (1997). Browsing digital information: Examining the "affordances" in the interaction of user and text. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
40. University of Canterbury (2013, July 1). Serendipity a factor in business growth. Retrieved from http://www.mba.canterbury.ac.nz/rss/news/?feed=news&articleId=903
41. van Andel, P., (1994). Anatomy of the unsought finding. Serendipity: Origin, history, domains, traditions, appearances, patterns and programmability. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 45 (2), 631-648.
42. Williamson, K., (2005). Ecological theory of human information behavior. In, K.E. Fisher, S. Erdelez, &, L. McKechnie, (Eds.), Theories of Information Behavior (pp. 128-132). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
43. Wilson, T.D., (1999). Models in information behaviour research. Journal of Documentation, 55 (3), 249-270.
44. Wood, S., Cox, R., &, Cheng, P., (2006). Attention design: Eight issues to consider. Computers in Human Behavior, 22 (4), 588-602.
45. Yadamsuren, B., &, Erdelez, S., (2010). Incidental exposure to online news. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 47 (1), 1-8.