Human and resource development is hard

Human Resource Development International

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 135-139

  Sambrook, Sally ^a  

^a BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84987766247     PISSN: 13678868     EISSN: 14698374     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13678868.2012.663189     Document Type: Editorial

References (23)

1. Becker, G., 1964. Human Capital, New York:Columbia University Press.
2. Becker, G.S., 1996. The Economic Way of Looking at Behavior:The Nobel Lecture, Palo Alto, CA:Hoover Institution, Stanford University. Essays in Public Policy, No. 69
3. Becker, G.S., 2002. The age of human capital. Education in the Twenty-First Century, http://economics.dlut.edu.cn/uploadfiles/20081106200614853.pdf (accessed December 16, 2011)
4. Becker, G.S., 2008. Human capital. The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics, Library of Economics and Liberty. http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/ HumanCapital.html (accessed December 16, 2011)
5. Bierema, L.L., and D'Abundo, M., 2003. “ Socially conscious HRD ”. In Critical Issues in HRD:A New Agenda for the Twenty-first Century, Edited by:Maycunich Gilley, A., Callahan, J.L., and Bierema, L.L., Cambridge, MA:Perseus Publishing.
6. Blake, R., 1995. Memories of HRD. Training and Development, 49 (no. 3):22–28.
7. Fenwick, T., 2005. Conceptions of critical HRD:Dilemmas for theory and practice. Human Resource Development International, 8 (no. 3):225–238.
8. Fenwick, T., 2011. Developing who, for what? Notes of caution in rethinking a global H(R)D:A response to Kuchinke. Human Resource Development International, 14 (no. 1):83–89.
9. Harrison, R., 1993. “ Developing people for whose bottom line? ”. In HRM Issues and Strategies, Edited by:Harrison, R., 299–329. Wokingham, UK:Addison Wesley.
10. Harter, J.K., Schmidt, F.L., and Hayes, T.L., 2002. Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement and business outcomes:A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87:268–279.
11. Kuchinke, K.P., 2010. Human development as a central goal for human resource development. Human Resource Development International, 13 (no. 5):575–585.
12. Lee, M.M., 2001. A refusal to define HRD. Human Resource Development International, 4:327–341.
13. McLean, G.N., 2004. National human resource development:What in the world is it?. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 6 (no. 3):269–275.
14. McLean, G.N., and McLean, L., 2001. If we can't define HRD in one country, how can we define it in an international context?. Human Resource Development International, 4 (no. 3):313–326.
15. O'Donnell, D., McGuire, D., and Cross, C., 2006. Critically challenging some assumptions in HRD. International Journal of Training and Development, 10 (no. 1):4–16.
16. Oxtoby, B., and P, Coster. 1992. HRD–A sticky label. Training and Development, April:31–332.
17. Rigg, C., Stewart, S., and Trehan, K., 2007. Critical human resource development:Beyond orthodoxy, Harlow:Pearson Education FT Prentice Hall.
18. Sambrook, S., 2012. “ What's so critical about human resource development? ”. In Human Resource Development as we know it, Speeches that Have Shaped the Field, Edited by:Lee, M., London:Routledge.
19. Shuck, B., Reio, T.G., Jr and Rocco, T.S., 2011. Employee engagement:An examination of antecedent and outcome variables. Human Resource Development International, 14 (no. 4):427–445.
20. Swanson, R.A., 1995. HRD:Performance is the key. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 6:207–213.
21. Thompson, P., 2011. The trouble with HRM. Human Resource Management Journal, 21 (no. 4):355–367.
22. Watson, T., 2004. Human resource management and critical social science analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 41 (no. 3):447–467.
23. Watson, T., 2010. Critical social science, pragmatism and the realities of HRM. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21 (no. 6):915–931.