DCU Participation in WMT2013 Metrics Task

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 435-439

  Wu, Xiaofeng ^a   Yu, Hui ^b   Liu, Qun ^a  

^a DUBLIN CITY UNIVERSITY   (Ireland)

^b INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEPENDENCY INFORMATIONS; EVALUATION METRICS; HUMAN JUDGMENTS; LANGUAGE PAIRS; MT EVALUATIONS; SENTENCE LEVEL; SYSTEM LEVELS;

EID: 84987758302     PISSN: 0736587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Yee Seng Chan and Hwee Tou Ng. 2008. Maxsim: A maximum similarity metric for machine translation evaluation. In Proceedings of ACL-08: HLT, pages 55-62.
2. Boxing Chen and Roland Kuhn. 2011. Amber: A modified bleu, enhanced ranking metric. In Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, pages 71-77, Edinburgh, Scotland, July. Association for Computational Linguistics.
3. Boxing Chen, Roland Kuhn, and George Foster. 2012. Improving amber, an mt evaluation metric. In Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, WMT'12, pages 59-63, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
4. Alon Lavie and Abhaya Agarwal. 2007. Meteor: an automatic metric for mt evaluation with high levels of correlation with human judgments. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, StatMT'07, pages 228-231, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
5. Ding Liu and Daniel Gildea. 2005. Syntactic features for evaluation of machine translation. In Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Intrinsic and Extrinsic Evaluation Measures for Machine Translation and/or Summarization, pages 25-32.
6. Q. Liu, H. Yu, X. Wu, J. Xie, Y. Lu, and S. Lin. 2013. A Novel Dependency Based MT Evaluation Method. Under Review.
7. Karolina Owczarzak, Josef van Genabith, and Andy Way. 2007a. Dependency-based automatic evaluation for machine translation. In Proceedings of the NAACL-HLT 2007/AMTA Workshop on Syntax and Structure in Statistical Translation, SSST'07, pages 80-87, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
8. Karolina Owczarzak, Josef van Genabith, and Andy Way. 2007b. Evaluating machine translation with lfg dependencies. Machine Translation, 21(2):95-119, June.
9. Karolina Owczarzak, Josef van Genabith, and Andy Way. 2007c. Labelled dependencies in machine translation evaluation. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, StatMT'07, pages 104-111, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
10. K. Papineni, S. Roukos, T. Ward, and W.J. Zhu. 2002. BLEU: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting on association for computational linguistics, pages 311-318. Association for Computational Linguistics.
11. Matthew Snover, Bonnie Dorr, Richard Schwartz, Linnea Micciulla, and John Makhoul. 2006. A study of translation edit rate with targeted human annotation. In Proceedings of Association for Machine Translation in the Americas, pages 223-231.
12. Junguo Zhu, Muyun Yang, Bo Wang, Sheng Li, and Tiejun Zhao. 2010. All in strings: a powerful string-based automatic mt evaluation metric with multiple granularities. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Posters, COLING'10, pages 1533-1540, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.