Labelled dependencies in machine translation evaluation

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 104-111

  Owczarzak, Karolina ^a   van Genabith, Josef ^a   Way, Andy ^a  

^a DUBLIN CITY UNIVERSITY   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; COMPUTER AIDED LANGUAGE TRANSLATION; SYNTACTICS;

EVALUATION METRICS; LABELLED DEPENDENCIES; LEXICAL-FUNCTIONAL GRAMMAR; MACHINE TRANSLATION EVALUATIONS; MACHINE TRANSLATIONS; SYNTACTIC VARIATIONS; WORDNET;

MACHINE TRANSLATION;

EID: 85042594758     PISSN: 0736587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Satanjeev Banerjee and Alon Lavie. 2005. METEOR: An Automatic Metric for MT Evaluation with Improved Correlation with Human Judgments. Proceedings of the Workshop on Intrinsic and Extrinsic Evaluation Measures for MT and/or Summarization at the Association for Computational Linguistics Conference 2005: 65-73. Ann Arbor, Michigan.
2. Joan Bresnan. 2001. Lexical-Functional Syntax, Blackwell, Oxford.
3. Aoife Cahill, Michael Burke, Ruth O'Donovan, Josef van Genabith, and Andy Way. 2004. Long-Distance Dependency Resolution in Automatically Acquired Wide-Coverage PCFG-Based LFG Approximations, In Proceedings of Association for Computational Linguistics 2004: 320-327. Barcelona, Spain.
4. Chris Callison-Burch, Miles Osborne and Philipp Koehn. 2006. Re-evaluating the role of BLEU in Machine Translation Research. Proceedings of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics 2006: 249-256. Oslo, Norway.
5. Michael J. Collins. 1999. Head-driven Statistical Models for Natural Language Parsing. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
6. George Doddington. 2002. Automatic Evaluation of MT Quality using N-gram Co-occurrence Statistics. Proceedings of Human Language Technology Conference 2002: 138-145. San Diego, California.
7. Kaplan, R. M., and J. Bresnan. 1982. Lexical-functional Grammar: A Formal System for Grammatical Representation. In J. Bresnan (ed.), The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations. MIT Press, Cambridge.
8. David Kauchak and Regina Barzilay. 2006. Paraphrasing for Automatic Evaluation. Proceedings of Human Language Technology - North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics Conference 2006: 45-462. New York, New York.
9. Philipp Koehn. 2004. Pharaoh: a beam search decoder for phrase-based statistical machine translation models. Proceedings of the Workshop on Machine Translation: From real users to research at the Association for Machine Translation in the Americas Conference 2004: 115-124. Washington, DC.
10. Philipp Koehn. 2005. Europarl: A Parallel Corpus for Statistical Machine Translation. Proceedings of MT Summit 2005: 79-86. Phuket, Thailand.
11. Alex Kulesza and Stuart M. Shieber. 2004. A learning approach to improving sentence-level MT evaluation. In Proceedings of the Conference on Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Machine Translation 2004: 75-84. Baltimore, Maryland.
12. Gregor Leusch, Nicola Ueffing and Hermann Ney. 2006. CDER: Efficient MT Evaluation Using Block Movements. Proceedings of European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics Conference 2006: 241-248. Trento, Italy.
13. Ding Liu and Daniel Gildea. 2005. Syntactic Features for Evaluation of Machine Translation. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Intrinsic and Extrinsic Evaluation Measures for Machine Translation and/or Summarization at the Association for Computational Linguistics Conference 2005. Ann Arbor, Michigan.
14. Franz Josef Och and Hermann Ney. 2003. A Systematic Comparison of Various Statistical Alignment Modes. Computational Linguistics, 29:19-51.
15. Karolina Owczarzak, Declan Groves, Josef van Genabith, and Andy Way. 2006. Contextual Bitext-Derived Paraphrases in Automatic MT Evaluation. Proceedings of the Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation at the Human Language Technology - North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics Conference 2006: 86-93. New York, New York.
16. Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, Todd Ward, and WeiJing Zhu. 2002. BLEU: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In Proceedings of Association for Computational Linguistics Conference 2002: 311-318. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
17. Grazia Russo-Lassner, Jimmy Lin, and Philip Resnik. 2005. A Paraphrase-based Approach to Machine Translation Evaluation. Technical Report LAMP-TR-125/CS-TR-4754/UMIACS-TR-2005-57, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
18. Mathew Snover, Bonnie Dorr, Richard Schwartz, John Makhoul, Linnea Micciula. 2006. A Study of Translation Error Rate with Targeted Human Annotation. Proceedings of the Association for Machine Translation in the Americas Conference 2006: 223-231. Boston, Massachusetts.
19. Joseph P. Turian, Luke Shen, and I. Dan Melamed. 2003. Evaluation of Machine Translation and Its Evaluation. Proceedings of MT Summit 2003: 386-393. New Orleans, Luisiana.
20. Ying Zhang and Stephan Vogel. 2004. Measuring confidence intervals for the machine translation evaluation metrics. Proceedings of Conference on Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Machine Translation 2004: 85-94. Baltimore, Maryland.