Learning distributed word representations for natural logic reasoning

AAAI Spring Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn SS-15-03, Issue , 2015, Pages 10-13

  Bowman, Samuel R ^a   Potts, Christopher ^a   Manning, Christopher D ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER CIRCUITS; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; SEMANTICS;

BASIC ALGEBRA; DISTRIBUTED REPRESENTATION; LOGICAL REASONING; LOGICAL SEMANTICS; NATURAL LOGIC; SEMANTIC REPRESENTATION; WORD NET; WORD REPRESENTATIONS;

NEURAL NETWORKS;

EID: 84987608736     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Baroni, M.; Bernardi, R.; Do, N.-Q.; and Shan, C.-c. 2012. Entailment above the word level in distributional semantics. In Proc. EACL.
2. Bowman, S.; Potts, C; and Manning, C. 2014. Recursive neural networks can learn logical semantics. arXiv manuscript 1406.1827.
3. Chen. D.: Socher. R.; Manning, C; and Ng. A. 2013. Learning new facts from knowledge bases with neural tensor networks and semantic word vectors. In Proc. ICLR.
4. Clark. S.; Coecke, B.; and Sadrzadeh, M. 2011. Mathematical foundations for a compositional distributed model of meaning. Linguistic Analysis 36(1-4):345-384.
5. Collobert, R.; Weston, J.; Bottou, L.; Karlen. M.; Kavukcuoglu, K.; and Kuksa, P. 2011. Natural language processing (almost) from scratch. JLMR 12.
6. Duchi, J.; Hazan, E.; and Singer, Y. 2011. Adaptive subgra-dient methods for online learning and stochastic optimization. JMLR.
7. Fellbaum, C. 2010. WordNet. In Theory and Applications of Ontology: Computer Applications. Springer.
8. Grefenstette, E. 2013. Towards a formal distributional semantics: Simulating logical calculi with tensors. arXiv manuscript 1304.5823.
9. Hermann, K.; Grefenstette, E.; and Blunsom, P. 2013. "Not not bad" is not "bad": A distributional account of negation. In Proc. of the 2013 Workshop on Continuous Vector Space Models and their Compositionality.
10. Hitzlcr. P.; Holldobler, S.; and Seda, A. K. 2004. Logic-programs and connectionist networks. Journal of Applied Logic 2(3).
11. Holldobler, S.; Kalinke, Y.; and Storr, H.-P. 1999. Approximating the semantics of logic programs by recurrent neural networks. Applied Intelligence 11(1).
12. Icard, T. and Moss. L. 2013a. A complete calculus of monotone and antitone higher-order functions. In Proc. Topology. Algebra, and Categories in Logic.
13. Icard, T. and Moss. L. 2013b. Recent progress on mono-tonicity. Linguistic Issues in Language Technology 9(7).
14. Katz, .1. J. 1972. Semantic Theory. New York: Harper & Row.
15. Maas. A.; Hannun, A.; and Ng. A. 2013. Rectifier nonlin-earities improve neural network acoustic models. In Proc. ICML.
16. MacCartney. B. and Manning, C. 2009. An extended model of natural logic. In Proc. IWCS.
17. Miller, G. A. 1995. WordNet: A lexical database for English. Communications of the ACM 38(11):39-41.
18. Pennington, J.; Socher. R.; and Manning, C. 2014. GloVe: Global vectors for word representation. In Proc. EMNLP.
19. Rei, M. and Briscoe, T. 2014. Looking for hyponyms in vector space. In Proc. CoNLL.
20. Rocktaschel, T.; Bosnjak, M.: Singh, S.; and Riedel. S. 2014. Low-dimensional embeddings of logic. In Proc. the ACL 2014 Workshop on Semantic Parsing.
21. Socher. R.: Pennington. J.; Huang. H.; Ng. A.; and Manning. C. 2011. Semi-supervised recursive autoencodcrs for predicting sentiment distributions. In Proc. EMNLP.
22. Sutskever, I.; Vinyals, O.: and Le, Q. 2014. Sequence to sequence learning with neural networks. In Proc. NIPS.
23. van Benthem, J. 2008. A brief history of natural logic. In Chakraborty, M.; Lowe, B.; Nath Mitra, M.; and Sarukki. S., eds. Logic, Navya-Nyaya and Applications: Homage to Bimal Matilal.