An extended model of natural logic

Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computational Semantics, IWCS 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 140-156

  MacCartney, Bill ^a   Manning, Christopher D ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATION THEORY; COMPUTER CIRCUITS;

EXTENDED MODEL; INFERENCE PROBLEM; LANGUAGE INFERENCE; LEXICAL FEATURES; LEXICAL-SEMANTIC RELATIONS; MONOTONICITY; NATURAL LANGUAGES; NATURAL LOGIC; SEMANTIC INTERPRETATION; SYNTACTIC FEATURES;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 77957878263     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. J. Bos and K. Markert. Recognising textual entailment with logical inference. In Proceedings of EMNLP-05, 2005.
2. M. Böttner. A note on existential import. Studia Logica, 47(1):35-40, 1988.
3. N. Chambers, D. Cer, T. Grenager, D. Hall, C. Kiddon, B. MacCartney, M. C. de Marneffe, D. Ramage, E. Yeh, and C. D. Manning. Learning Alignments and Leveraging Natural Logic. In Proceedings of the ACL-07 Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing, 2007.
4. C. Condoravdi, D. Crouch, V. de Paiva, R. Stolle, and D.G. Bobrow. Entailment, Intensionality and Text Understanding. In Proceedings of the HLT-NAACL 2003 Workshop on Text Meaning, Morristown, NJ, USA, 2003.
5. Robin Cooper et al. Using the framework. Technical Report LRE 62-051 D-16, The FraCaS Consortium, 1996.
6. I. Dagan, O. Glickman, and B. Magnini. The PASCAL Recognising Textual Entailment Challenge. In Proceedings of the PASCAL Challenges Workshop on Recognising Textual Entailment, 2005.
7. Y. Fyodorov, Y. Winter, and N. Francez. A Natural Logic Inference System. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Inference in Computational Semantics (ICoS-2), 2000.
8. D. Giampiccolo, B. Magnini, I. Dagan, and B. Dolan. The Third PASCAL Recognizing Textual Entailment Challenge. In Proceedings of the ACL-07 Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing, 2007.
9. O. Glickman, I. Dagan, and M. Koppel. Web based probabilistic textual entailment. In Proceedings of the PASCAL Challenges Workshop on Recognizing Textual Entailment, 2005.
10. A. Hickl, J. Williams, J. Bensley, K. Roberts, B. Rink, and Y. Shi. Recognizing Textual Entailment with LCC's GROUNDHOG System. In Proceedings of the Second PASCAL Challenges Workshop on Recognizing Textual Entailment, 2006.
11. G. Lakoff. Linguistics and natural logic. Synthese, 22:151-271, 1970.
12. B. MacCartney, M. Galley, and C. D. Manning. A phrase-based alignment model for natural language inference. In Proceedings of EMNLP-08, Honolulu, HI, 2008.
13. B. MacCartney, T. Grenager, M. C. de Marneffe, D. Cer, and C. D. Manning. Learning to Recognize Features of Valid Textual Entailments. In Proceedings of NAACL-06, New York, 2006.
14. B. MacCartney and C. D. Manning. Modeling semantic containment and exclusion in natural language inference. In Proceedings of Coling-08, Manchester, UK, 2008.
15. R. Nairn, C. Condoravdi, and L. Karttunen. Computing relative polarity for textual inference. In Proceedings of ICoS-5, Buxton, UK, 2006.
16. A. Ritter, D. Downey, S. Soderland, and O. Etzioni. It's a Contradiction-No, it's Not: A Case Study using Functional Relations. In Proceedings of EMNLP-08, 2008.
17. V. Sánchez Valencia. Studies on Natural Logic and Categorial Grammar. PhD thesis, Univ. Amsterdam, 1991.
18. J. Sukkarieh. Quasi-NL Knowledge Representation for Structurally-Based Inferences. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Inference in Computational Semantics (ICoS-3), 2001.
19. J. van Benthem. The semantics of variety in categorial grammars. In W. Buszkowski, W. Marciszewski, and J. van Benthem, editors, Categorial grammar, pages 33-55. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 1988.
20. J. van Benthem. Language in Action: Categories, lambdas and dynamic logic, volume 130 of Studies in Logic. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1991.
21. J. van Benthem. A brief history of natural logic. Technical Report PP-2008-05, Institute for Logic, Language & Computation, 2008.
22. R. A. van der Sandt. Presupposition projection as anaphora resolution. Journal of Semantics, 9(4), 1992.
23. J. van Eijck. Natural logic for natural language. http://homepages.cwi.nl/\texttt{\~}jve/papers/05/nlnl/NLNL.pdf, 2005.