Validation of the rational and experiential multimodal inventory in the Italian context

Psychological Reports

Volumn 119, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 242-262

  Monacis, Lucia ^a   de Palo, Valeria ^b   Di Nuovo, Santo ^c   Sinatra, Maria ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FOGGIA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VERONA   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CATANIA   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BARI   (Italy)

Author keywords

Information processing; Rational and experiential multimodal inventory; Social desirability

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; DEVICES; FEMALE; HUMAN; ITALY; MALE; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY; STANDARDS; VALIDATION STUDY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; ITALY; MALE; PSYCHOMETRICS; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84986540188     PISSN: 00332941     EISSN: 1558691X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0033294116657623     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Allinson, C. W., & Hayes, J. (1996). The cognitive style index: A measure of intuitionanalysis for organizational research. Journal of Management Studies, 33, 119–135.
2. Baldwin, B. (1989). A primer in the use and interpretation of structural equation models. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 22, 100–112.
3. Bentler, P., & Bonnett, D. (1980). Significance test and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606.
4. Berzonsky, M. D. (1990). Self-construction over the life-span: A process perspective on identity formation. In G. H. Neimeyer & R. A. Neimeyer (Eds.), Advances in personal construct psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 155–186). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
5. Berzonsky, M. D. (2008). Identity formation: The role of identity processing style and cognitive processes. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 645–655.
6. Berzonsky, M. D., Soenens, B., Luyckx, K., Smits, I., Papini, D. R., & Goossens, L. (2013). Development and validation of the revised identity style inventory (ISI-5): Factor structure, reliability, and validity. Psychological Assessment, 25(3), 893–904.
7. Betsch, C. (2004). Preference for intuition and deliberation (PID): An inventory for assessing affect and cognition based decision-making. Zeitschrift fu¨r Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 25, 179–197.
8. Björklund, F., & Bäckström, M. (2008). Individual differences in processing styles: Validity of the rational-experiential inventory. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49(5), 439–446.
9. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: John Wiley.
10. Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116–131.
11. Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354.
12. Epstein, S. (1983). The unconscious, the preconscious and the self-concept. In J. Suls & A. Greenwald (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 2, pp. 219–247). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Epstein, S. (1990). Cognitive-experiential Self-theory. In L. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality theory and research: Theory and research (pp. 165–192). New York, NY: Guilford Publications, Inc.
14. Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49, 709–724.
15. Epstein, S. (1998). Cognitive-experiential self-theory. In D. Barone, M. Hersen & V. B. VanHasselt (Eds.), Advanced personality (pp. 211–238). New York, NY: Plenum.
16. Epstein, S. (2003). Cognitive-experiential self theory of personality. In T. Millon & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 159–184). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
17. Epstein, S., Pacini, R., Denes-Raj, V., & Heier, H. (1996). Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 390–405.
18. Evans, J., & St B. T. (2003). In two minds: Dual process accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(10), 454–459.
19. Evans, J. B. T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255–278.
20. Genovese, J. (2006). Age, sex, conscientiousness, and thinking style predict academic avoidance. Individual Differences Research, 4, 123–128.
21. Handley, S. J., Newstead, S. E., & Wright, H. (2000). Rational end experiential thinking: Study of the REI. In R. J. Riding & S. G. Rayner (Eds.), International perspectives on individual differences (Vol. 1, pp. 97–113). Stamford, CO: Ablex.
22. Hines, T. (1987). Left brain/right brain mythology and implications for management and training. The Academy of Management Review, 12, 600–606.
23. Henderson, J. C., & Nutt, P. C. (1980). The influence of decision style on decision making behavior. Management Science, 26(4), 371–386.
24. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.
25. Iannello, P. (2010). Mindreading processes in strategic decision-making. When intuition makes a difference. Saarbrücken, Germany: VDM Verlag Dr. Muller.
26. Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2005). A model of heuristic judgment. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 267–293). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
27. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
28. Kuo, W., Sjostrom, T., Chen, Y., Wang, Y., & Huang, C. (2009). Intuition and deliberation: Two systems for strategizing in the brain. Science, 324, 519–522.
29. Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guildford Press.
30. Maino, E., & Aceti, G. (1997). Contributo all’adattamento italiano della Marlowe- Crowne Social Desirability Scale [Contribution to the Italian adaptation of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale]. TPM Testing Psychometrics Methodology in Applied Psychology, 4, 81–93.
31. Merenda, P. F. (1997). A guide to the proper use of factor analysis in the conduct and reporting of research: Pitfalls to avoid. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 30, 156–164.
32. Merenda, P. F. (2006). An overview of adapting educational and psychological assessment instruments: Past and present. Psychological Reports, 99, 307–314.
33. Miller, A. (1987). Cognitive styles: An integrated model. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 7, 251–268.
34. Mitchell, M., & Jolley, J. (2012). Research design explained. Wadsworth, OH: Cengage Learning.
35. Monacis, L., de Palo, V., Sinatra, M., & Berzonsky, M. D. (2016). The Revised identity style inventory: Factor structure and validity in Italian speaking students. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 883.
36. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
37. Naitou, M., Suzuki, K., & Sakamoto, A. (2004). Development of rational and intuitive information-processing style inventory. The Japanese Journal of Personality, 13, 67–78.
38. Norris, P., & Epstein, S. (2011). An experiential thinking style: Its facets and relations with objective and subjective criterion measures. Journal of Personality, 79(5), 1043–1080.
39. Pacini, R., & Epstein, S. (1999). The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 972–987.
40. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York, NY: Springer Verlag.
41. Shiloh, S., Salton, E., & Sharabi, D. (2002). Individual differences in rational and intuitive thinking styles as predictors of heuristic responses and framing effects. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 415–429.
42. Sladek, R. M., Bond, M. J., & Phillips, P. A. (2010). Age and gender differences in pReferences for rational and experiential thinking. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(8), 907–911.
43. Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 3–22.
44. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2002). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 421–440). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
45. Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(3), 220–247.
46. Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70.
47. Witteman, C., van den Bercken, J., Claes, L., & Godoy, A. (2009). Assessing rational and intuitive thinking styles. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 25(1), 39–47.
48. Wolfradt, U., Oubaid, V., Straube, E. R., Bischoff, N., & Mischo, J. (1999). Thinking styles, schizotypal traits and anomolous experiences. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 821–830.