GIFT: A real-time and scalable 3D shape search engine

Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Volumn 2016-December, Issue , 2016, Pages 5023-5032

  Bai, Song ^a   Bai, Xiang ^a   Zhou, Zhichao ^a   Zhang, Zhaoxiang ^b   Latecki, Longin Jan ^c  

^a HUAZHONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b Shenzhen Fundamental Research Institutions   (United States)

^c TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER VISION; FEATURE EXTRACTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

3D SHAPE RETRIEVAL; COMPUTATIONAL COSTS; HUMAN VISUAL PERCEPTION; LOCAL DISTRIBUTIONS; REAL-TIME PROPERTIES; RETRIEVAL ACCURACY; SEARCH ENGINE RESULTS; STATE-OF-THE-ART METHODS;

SEARCH ENGINES;

EID: 84986285622     PISSN: 10636919     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2016.543     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (44)

1. X. Bai, S. Bai, Z. Zhu, and L. J. Latecki. 3d shape matching via two layer coding. TPAMI, 37(12):2361-2373, 2015.
2. M. M. Bronstein and I. Kokkinos. Scale-invariant heat kernel signatures for non-rigid shape recognition. In CVPR, pages 1704-1711, 2010.
3. K. Chatfield, K. Simonyan, A. Vedaldi, and A. Zisserman. Return of the devil in the details: Delving deep into convolutional nets. CoRR, abs/1405.3531, 2014.
4. D. Y. Chen, X. P. Tian, Y. T. Shen, and M. Ouhyoung. On visual similarity based 3d model retrieval. Comput. Graph. Forum, 22(3):223-232, 2003.
5. M. Donoser and H. Bischof. Diffusion processes for retrieval revisited. In CVPR, pages 1320-1327, 2013.
6. Y. Fang, J. Xie, G. Dai, M. Wang, F. Zhu, T. Xu, and E. Wong. 3d deep shape descriptor. In CVPR, pages 2319-2328, 2015.
7. L. Fei-Fei and P. Perona. A Bayesian hierarchical model for learning natural scene categories. In CVPR, pages 524-531, 2005.
8. D. Giorgi, S. Biasotti, and L. Paraboschi. Shape retrieval contest 2007: Watertight models track. SHREC competition, 8, 2007.
9. M. Havlena and K. Schindler. Vocmatch: Efficient multiview correspondence for structure from motion. In ECCV, pages 46-60, 2014.
10. H. Jégou, M. Douze, and C. Schmid. On the burstiness of visual elements. In CVPR, pages 1169-1176, 2009.
11. M. Kazhdan, T. Funkhouser, and S. Rusinkiewicz. Rotation invariant spherical harmonic representation of 3d shape descriptors. In SGP, pages 156-164, 2003.
12. I. Kokkinos, M. M. Bronstein, R. Litman, and A. M. Bronstein. Intrinsic shape context descriptors for deformable shapes. In CVPR, pages 159-166, 2012.
13. B. Li and H. Johan. 3d model retrieval using hybrid features and class information. Multimedia tools and applications, 62(3):821-846, 2013.
14. B. Li, Y. Lu, C. Li, A. Godil, T. Schreck, M. Aono, et al. A comparison of 3d shape retrieval methods based on a large-scale benchmark supporting multimodal queries. CVIU, 131:1-27, 2015.
15. C. Li, M. Ovsjanikov, and F. Chazal. Persistence-based structural recognition. In CVPR, pages 2003-2010, 2014.
16. Z. Lian, A. Godil, X. Sun, and J. Xiao. Cm-bof: visual similarity-based 3d shape retrieval using clock matching and bag-of-features. Mach. Vis. Appl., 24(8):1685-1704, 2013.
17. H. Ling and D. W. Jacobs. Shape classification using the inner-distance. TPAMI, 29(2):286-299, 2007.
18. R. Litman, A. Bronstein, M. Bronstein, and U. Castellani. Supervised learning of bag-of-features shape descriptors using sparse coding. Computer Graphics Forum, 33(5):127-136, 2014.
19. M. Liu, B. C. Vemuri, S. ichi Amari, and F. Nielsen. Shape retrieval using hierarchical total bregman soft clustering. TPAMI, 34(12):2407-2419, 2012.
20. D. G. Lowe. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. IJCV, 60(2):91-110, 2004.
21. T. Mei, Y. Rui, S. Li, and Q. Tian. Multimedia search reranking: A literature survey. ACM Comput. Surv., 46(3):38:1-38:38, 2014.
22. P. Papadakis, I. Pratikakis, S. J. Perantonis, and T. Theoharis. Efficient 3d shape matching and retrieval using a concrete radialized spherical projection representation. Pattern Recognition, 40(9):2437-2452, 2007.
23. P. Papadakis, I. Pratikakis, T. Theoharis, G. Passalis, and S. J. Perantonis. 3d object retrieval using an efficient and compact hybrid shape descriptor. In 3DOR, pages 9-16, 2008.
24. P. Papadakis, I. Pratikakis, T. Theoharis, and S. J. Perantonis. Panorama: A 3d shape descriptor based on panoramic views for unsupervised 3d object retrieval. IJCV, 89(2-3):177-192, 2010.
25. E. Rodolà, T. Harada, Y. Kuniyoshi, and D. Cremers. Efficient shape matching using vector extrapolation. In BMVC, volume 1, 2013.
26. E. Rodola, S. Rota Bulò, T. Windheuser, M. Vestner, and D. Cremers. Dense non-rigid shape correspondence using random forests. In CVPR, pages 4177-4184, 2014.
27. E. Rodola, A. Torsello, T. Harada, Y. Kuniyoshi, and D. Cremers. Elastic net constraints for shape matching. In ICCV, pages 1169-1176, 2013.
28. B. Shi, S. Bai, Z. Zhou, and X. Bai. Deeppano: Deep panoramic representation for 3-d shape recognition. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 22(12):2339-2343, 2015.
29. P. Shilane, P. Min, M. M. Kazhdan, and T. A. Funkhouser. The princeton shape benchmark. In SMI, 2004.
30. K. Siddiqi, J. Zhang, D. Macrini, A. Shokoufandeh, S. Bouix, and S. J. Dickinson. Retrieving articulated 3-d models using medial surfaces. Mach. Vis. Appl., 19(4):261-275, 2008.
31. I. Sipiran, B. Bustos, T. Schreck, A. Bronstein, S. Choi, L. Lai, H. Li, R. Litman, and L. Sun. Scalability of non-rigid 3d shape retrieval. In 3DOR, pages 121-128, 2015.
32. H. Su, S. Maji, E. Kalogerakis, and E. G. Learned-Miller. Multi-view convolutional neural networks for 3d shape recognition. In ICCV, 2015.
33. H. Tabia, M. Daoudi, J.-P. Vandeborre, and O. Colot. A new 3d-matching method of nonrigid and partially similar models using curve analysis. TPAMI, 33(4):852-858, 2011.
34. H. Tabia, H. Laga, D. Picard, and P.-H. Gosselin. Covariance descriptors for 3d shape matching and retrieval. In CVPR, pages 4185-4192, 2014.
35. H. Tabia, D. Picard, H. Laga, and P. H. Gosselin. Compact vectors of locally aggregated tensors for 3d shape retrieval. In 3DOR, pages 17-24, 2013.
36. A. Tatsuma, H. Koyanagi, and M. Aono. A large-scale shape benchmark for 3d object retrieval: Toyohashi shape benchmark. In APSIPA, pages 1-10, 2012.
37. D. V. Vranic. Desire: a composite 3d-shape descriptor. In ICME, pages 962-965, 2005.
38. Y. Wang, M. Gong, T. Wang, D. Cohen-Or, H. Zhang, and B. Chen. Projective analysis for 3d shape segmentation. ACM Trans. Graph., 32(6):192:1-192:12, 2013.
39. Z. Wu, S. Song, A. Khosla, F. Yu, L. Zhang, X. Tang, and J. Xiao. 3d shapenets: A deep representation for volumetric shape modeling. In CVPR, 2015.
40. J. Xie, Y. Fang, F. Zhu, and E. Wong. Deepshape: Deep learned shape descriptor for 3d shape matching and retrieval. In CVPR, pages 1275-1283, 2015.
41. X. Yang, S. Koknar-Tezel, and L. J. Latecki. Locally constrained diffusion process on locally densified distance spaces with applications to shape retrieval. In CVPR, pages 357-364, 2009.
42. S. Zhang, M. Yang, T. Cour, K. Yu, and D. N. Metaxas. Query specific rank fusion for image retrieval. TPAMI, 37(4):803-815, 2015.
43. L. Zheng, S. Wang, L. Tian, F. He, Z. Liu, and Q. Tian. Query-adaptive late fusion for image search and person reidentification. In CVPR, pages 1741-1750, 2015.
44. Z.-H. Zhou and M. Li. Semi-supervised regression with cotraining. In IJCAI, 2005.