A Web-lab to enhance social science infrastructure: Experiments, simulations and archiving

Journal of Knowledge Management

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 276-287

  Willer, David ^a   Rutström, Lisa ^a   Karr, Linda B ^a   Corra, Mamadi ^a   Girard, Dudley ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Databases; Internet; Research; Software development

Indexed keywords

EID: 84986145317     PISSN: 13673270     EISSN: 17587484     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/13673279910304023     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. Bell, R., Walker, H. and Willer, D. (forthcoming), “Power, influence and legitimacy in organizations: implications of three theoretical research programs”, in Lawler, E.J. and Bacharach, S. (Eds), Research in the Sociology of Organizations.
2. Berger, J., Cohen, B.P. and Zelditch, M. Jr (1972), “Status characteristics and social interaction”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 37, pp. 241-55.
3. Berger, J., Conner, T.L. and Fisek, M.H. (Eds) (1974), Expectation States Theory: A Theoretical Research Program, Winthrop, Cambridge, MA, (reprinted, University Press of America, Lanham, MD, 1982).
4. Berger, J., Fisek, M.H., Norman, R.Z. and Zelditch, M. Jr (1977), Status Characteristics and Social Interaction, Elsevier, New York, NY.
5. Bonacich, P. and Bienenstock, E. (1995), “When rationality fails”, Rationality and Society, Vol. 7, pp. 293-320.
6. Bonacich, P. and Bienenstock, E. (1997), “Latent classes in exchange networks: sets of positions with common interests”, Journal of Mathematical Sociology, Vol. 22, pp. 1-28.
7. Bullock, D.S. and Rutström, E.E. (1998), “The size of the prize: testing rent-dissipation when transfer quantity is endogenous”, unpublished manuscript, Department of Economics, University of South Carolina, August.
8. Davis, D.D. and Holt, C.A. (1993), Experimental Economics, Princeton University Press.
9. Faucheux, C. (1976), “Cross-cultural research in social psychology”, European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 6, pp. 269-322.
10. Foschi, M. (1980), “Theory, experimentation and cross-cultural comparisons in social psychology”, Canadian Journal of Sociology, Vol. 5, pp. 91-102.
11. Gode, D. and Sunder, S. (1993), “Allocative efficiency of markets with zero intelligence traders: markets as a partial substitute for individual rationality”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 101, pp. 119-37.
12. Harrison, G.W. and McCabe, K. (1996), “Expectations and fairness in a simple bargaining experiment”, International Journal of Game Theory, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 303-27.
13. Hoffman, E., McCabe, K. and Smith, V. (1996), “Social distance and other regarding behavior in dictator games”, American Economic Review, June, pp. 653-60.
14. Johnson, C. (1993), “Gender and formal authority”, Social Psychology Quarterly, Vol. 56, pp. 193-210.
15. Kagel, J.H. and Roth, A.E. (1995), Handbook of Experimental Economics, Princeton University Press.
16. Lakatos, I. (1970), “Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes”, in Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A. (Eds), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 91-196.
17. Lawler, E.J. 1992. “Power processes in bargaining”, The Sociological Quarterly, Vol. 33, pp. 17-34.
18. McDaniel, T.M., and Rutström, E.E. (1998), “Decision-making costs and problem-solving performance”, unpublished manuscript, Department of Economics, University of South Carolina, March.
19. Morrison, W.G. and Rutström, E.E. (1998), “Trust, reciprocity, and psychological equilibria in an investment game experiment with belief elicitation”, unpublished manuscript, Department of Economics, University of South Carolina.
20. Ridgeway, C. (1991), “The social construction of status value: gender and other nominal characteristics”, Social Forces, Vol. 70, pp. 367-86.
21. Ridgeway, C.L. and Berger, J. (1986), “Expectations, legitimation, and dominance behavior in task groups”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 51, pp. 603-17.
22. Ridgeway, C.L. and Walker, H.A. (1995), “Status structures”, in Cook, K.S., Fine, G.A. and House, J.S. (Eds), Sociological Perspectives on Social Psychology, Allyn & Bacon, Boston, MA, pp. 281-310.
23. Rutström, E.E., and Williams, M.B. (1998), “Entitlements and fairness: an experimental study of distributive preferences”, unpublished manuscript, Department of Economics, University of South Carolina, September.
24. Thye, S.R. (1997), “From status to power: a status value theory of power in exchange networks”, unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa.
25. Thye, S.R. (forthcoming), “Status influence and status value”, in Willer, D. (Ed.), Network Exchange Theory, Greenwood Press, New York, NY.
26. Troyer, L. and Younts, C.W. (1997), “Whose expectations matter? The relative power of first- and second-order expectations in determining social influence”, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 103, pp. 692-732.
27. Walker, H.A. and Cohen, B.P. (1985), “Scope statements: imperatives for evaluating theory”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 50, pp. 288-301.
28. Walker, H.A. and Zelditch, M. Jr (1993), “Power, legitimacy, and the stability of authority: a theoretical research program”, in Berger, J. and Zelditch, M. Jr (Eds), Theoretical Research Programs: Studies in the Growth of Theory, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, pp. 364-82.
29. Walker, H.A., Ilardi, B.C., McMahon, A.M. and Fennell, M.L. (1996). “Gender, interaction, and leadership”, Social Psychology Quarterly, Vol. 59, pp. 255-72.
30. Willer, D. (1981a), “The basic concepts of elementary theory”, in Willer, D. and Anderson, B. (Eds), Networks, Exchange and Coercion, Elsevier, New York, NY, pp. 25-53.
31. Willer, D. (1981b), “Quantity and network structure”, in Willer, D. and Anderson, B. (Eds), Networks, Exchange and Coercion, Elsevier, New York, NY, pp. 109-27.
32. Willer, D. (1987), Theory and the Experimental Investigation of Social Structures, Gordon and Breach, New York, NY.
33. Willer, D. (1992), “Predicting power in exchange networks: a brief history and introduction to the issues”, Social Networks, Vol. 14, pp. 187-212.
34. Willer, D. and Markovsky, B. (1993), “Elementary theory: its development and research program”, in Berger, J. and Zelditch, M. Jr (Eds), Theoretical Research Programs: Studies in Theory Growth, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, pp. 323-63.
35. Willer, D., Lovaglia, M.J. and Markovsky, B. (1997), “Power and influence: a theoretical bridge”, Social Forces, Vol. 76 No. 2, pp. 571-603.
36. Zelditch, M. Jr and Walker, H.A. (1984), “Legitimacy and the stability of authority”, in Lawler, E.J. (Ed.), Advances in Group Processes: Theory and Research, Vol. 1, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, Ch. 1, (reprinted as Ch. 15 in Berger, J. and Zelditch, M. Jr (Eds), Status, Power and Legitimacy, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ).
37. Berger, J., Rosenholtz, S.J. and Zelditch, M. Jr (1980), “Status organizing processes”, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 6, pp. 479-508.
38. Lawler, E.J. and Yoon, J. (1993), “Power and the emergence of commitment behavior in negotiated exchange”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 58, pp. 465-81.
39. Lawler, E.J. and Yoon, J. (1996), “Commitment in exchange relations: test of a theory of relational cohesion”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 61, pp. 89-108.
40. Lawler, E.J. and Yoon, J. (1998), “Network structure and emotion in exchange relations”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 63, pp. 871-94.
41. Lovaglia, M., Skvoretz, J., Willer, D. and Markovsky, B. (1995), “Negotiated outcomes in social exchange networks”, Social Forces, Vol. 74, pp. 123-55.
42. Ridgeway, C. and Johnson, C. (1990), “What is the relationship between socioemotional behavior and status in task groups”, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 95, pp. 1189-212.
43. Ridgeway, C., Boyle, E., Kuipers, K. and Robinson, D. (forthcoming), “How do status beliefs develop? The role of resources and interaction”, American Sociological Review.
44. Rutström, E.E. (1998), “Home-grown values and incentive compatible auction design”, International Journal of Game Theory, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 427-41.
45. Walker, H.A. (1992), “Legitimating social behavior: developments and prospects”, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Pittsburgh, PA.
46. Willer, D. and Anderson, B. (Eds) (1981), Networks, Exchange, and Coercion, Elsevier, New York, NY.
47. Willer, D. and Skvoretz, J. (1997a), “Network connection and exchange ratios: theory, predictions and experimental tests”, in Markovsky, B., Lovaglia, M. and Troyer, L. (Eds), Advances in Group Process, Vol. 14, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 199-234.
48. Willer, D. and Skvoretz, J. (1997b), “Games and structures”, Rationality and Society, Vol. 9, pp. 5-35.
49. Willer, D. and Szmatka, J. (1993), “Cross-national experimental investigations of elementary theory: implications for the generality of the theory and the autonomy of social structure”, in Lawler, E.J., Markovsky, B., Heimer, K. and O'Brien, J. (Eds), Advances in Group Processes, Vol. 10, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 37-81.