Collaborative collection building of electronic resources: A business faculty/librarian partnership

Collection Building

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 177-181

  White, Gary W ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Collections management; Electronic media

Indexed keywords

EID: 84986132519     PISSN: 01604953     EISSN: 20545592     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/01604950410564500     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Association of Research Libraries (1992), Libraries Liaison Services in ARL Libraries, Association of Research Libraries, Office of Management Services, Washington, DC.
2. Buis, E. (1993), “Let's make sure we are not part of the problem: a librarian's lament”, Collection Building, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 21-3.
3. Chu, F.T. (1995), “Collaboration in a loosely coupled system: librarian-faculty relationships in collection development”, Library & Information Science Research, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 135-50.
4. Chu, F.T. (1997), “Librarian-faculty relations in collection development”, Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 15-20.
5. Davis, M.A. and Cook, M.K. (1996), “Implementing a library liaison program: personnel, budget, and training”, Collection Management, Vol. 20 No. 3/4, pp. 157-65.
6. Dittemore, M.R. (1992), “Changing patterns of faculty participation in collection development”, Collection Management, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 79-89.
7. Hay, J.H. (1990), “The subject specialist in the academic library: a review article”, Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 11-17.
8. Jenkins, P.O. (1996), “Faculty priorities: where does material selection stand?”, Collection Building, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 19-20.
9. Johnson, P. (1996), “Selecting electronic resources: developing a local decision-making matrix”, Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, Vol. 22 No. 3/4, pp. 9-24.
10. Johnson, P. (2004), Fundamentals of Collection Development and Management, American Library Association, Chicago, IL.
11. Kushkowski, J.D. (2000), “A method for determining faculty preference for monographs”, Collection Building, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 17-23.
12. Metz, J. (2000), “Principles of selection for electronic resources”, Library Trends, Vol. 48 No. 4, pp. 711-28.
13. Power, A.T. and Pavy, J. (1995), “Collection development in the field of communication studies”, Collection Building, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 9-23.
14. Rader, H.B. (2004), “Building faculty-librarian partnerships to prepare students for information fluency”, College and Research Libraries News, Vol. 65 No. 2, pp. 74-83.
15. Reference and User Services Association (2001), “Guidelines for liaison work in managing collections and services”, Reference and User Services Quarterly, Vol. 41 No. 2, pp. 107-9.
16. Simmons, E.A. and MacDonald, R.M. (1997), “Reference services and collection development faculty outreach through the campus network”, The Reference Librarian, Vol. 28 No. 58, pp. 101-6.
17. Stacy-Bates, K.K., Fryer, J., Kushkowski, J. and Shonrock, D.D. (2003), “Competencies for bibliographers: a process for writing a collection development competencies document”, Reference and User Services Quarterly, Vol. 42 No. 3, pp. 235-41.