Free-living monitoring of Parkinson's disease: Lessons from the field

Movement Disorders

Volumn 31, Issue 9, 2016, Pages 1293-1313

  Del Din, Silvia ^a   Godfrey, Alan ^a   Mazzà, Claudia ^b   Lord, Sue ^a   Rochester, Lynn ^a  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

free living assessment; Parkinson's disease; remote monitoring; wearable technology

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADOPTION; ALGORITHM; AMBULATORY CARE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL FEATURE; CRITERION RELATED VALIDITY; FREEZING; GAIT; HUMAN; MOBILIZATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARKINSON DISEASE; PATIENT MONITORING; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REMOTE SENSING; RISK FACTOR; SEDENTARY LIFESTYLE; SLEEP; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

EID: 84985930805     PISSN: 08853185     EISSN: 15318257     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mds.26718     Document Type: Article

References (107)

1. Lowe SA, Olaighin G. Monitoring human health behaviour in one's living environment: a technological review. Med Eng Phys 2014;36(2):147–168.
2. Robles-Garcia V, Corral-Bergantinos Y, Espinosa N, et al. Spatiotemporal gait patterns during overt and covert evaluation in patients with Parkinson s Disease and healthy subjects: is there a Hawthorne effect? J Appl Biomech 2015;31(3):189–194.
3. Maetzler W, Rochester L. Body-worn sensors-the brave new world of clinical measurement? Mov Disord 2015;30(9):1203–1205.
4. Steins D, Dawes H, Esser P, Collett J. Wearable accelerometry-based technology capable of assessing functional activities in neurological populations in community settings: a systematic review. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2014;11:36.
5. Pasluosta C, Gassner H, Winkler J, Klucken J, Eskofier B. An emerging era in the management of Parkinson's disease: wearable technologies and the Internet of things. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 2015;19(6):1873–1881.
6. Awais M, Mellone S, Chiari L. Physical activity classification meets daily life: Review on existing methodologies and open challenges. 37th Annual International Conference Procedings of IEEE EMBS (EMBC). 2015:5050–5053. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2015.7319526
7. Hobert MA, Maetzler W, Aminian K, Chiari L. Technical and clinical view on ambulatory assessment in Parkinson's disease. Acta Neurol Scand 2014;130(3):139–147.
8. Maetzler W, Domingos J, Srulijes K, Ferreira JJ, Bloem BR. Quantitative wearable sensors for objective assessment of Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord 2013;28(12):1628–1637.
9. Godinho C, Domingos J, Cunha G, et al. A systematic review of the characteristics and validity of monitoring technologies to assess Parkinson's disease. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2016;13(1):24.
10. Goetz CG, Tilley BC, Shaftman SR, et al. Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): scale presentation and clinimetric testing results. Mov Disord 2008;23(15):2129–2170.
11. Ossig C, Antonini A, Buhmann C, et al. Wearable sensor-based objective assessment of motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 2016;123(1):57–64.
12. Papapetropoulos S, Mitsi G, Espay AJ. Digital health revolution: is it time for affordable remote monitoring for Parkinson's disease? Front Neurol 2015;6:34.
13. Godfrey A, Lara J, Del Din S, et al. iCap: instrumented assessment of physical capability. Maturitas 2015;82(1):116–122.
14. Schoneburg B, Mancini M, Horak F, Nutt JG. Framework for understanding balance dysfunction in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord 2013;28(11):1474–1482.
15. Horak F, King L, Mancini M. Role of body-worn movement monitor technology for balance and gait rehabilitation. Phys Ther 2015;95(3):461–470.
16. Cancela J, Pansera M, Pastorino M, Pastor L, Arredondo MT. Automatic assessment of bradykinesia severity in patients with Parkinson's disease. Paper presented at: 7th International Conference on Wearable Micro and Nano Technologies for Personalized Health, Berlin (Germany), 2010.
17. Pastorino M, Cancela J, Arredondo MT, Pastor-Sanz L, Contardi S, Valzania F. Preliminary results of ON/OFF detection using an integrated system for Parkinson's disease monitoring. Annual International Conference Procedings of IEEE EMBS IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Annual Conference 2013:941-944.
18. Griffiths RI, Kotschet K, Arfon S, et al. Automated assessment of bradykinesia and dyskinesia in Parkinson's disease. J Parkinsons Dis 2012;2(1):47–55.
19. Mera TO, Heldman DA, Espay AJ, Payne M, Giuffrida JP. Feasibility of home-based automated Parkinson's disease motor assessment. J Neurosci Methods 2012;203(1):152–156.
20. Horne MK, McGregor S, Bergquist F. An objective fluctuation score for Parkinson's disease. PloS ONE 2015;10(4):e0124522.
21. Das S, Amoedo B, De la Torre F, Hodgins J. Detecting Parkinsons' symptoms in uncontrolled home environments: a multiple instance learning approach. Annual International Conference Procedings of IEEE EMBS IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Annual Conference 2012:3688-3691.
22. Tzallas AT, Tsipouras MG, Rigas G, et al. PERFORM: a system for monitoring, assessment and management of patients with Parkinson's disease. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 2014;14(11):21329–21357.
23. Ferreira JJ, Godinho C, Santos AT, et al. Quantitative home-based assessment of Parkinson's symptoms: the SENSE-PARK feasibility and usability study. BMC Neurol 2015;15:89.
24. Hammerla NY, Fisher JM, Andras P, Rochester L, Walker R, Plötz T. PD disease state assessment in naturalistic environments using deep learning. Paper presented at: Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence; Austin, Texas (USA), 2015.
25. Louter M, Maetzler W, Prinzen J, et al. Accelerometer-based quantitative analysis of axial nocturnal movements differentiates patients with Parkinson's disease, but not high-risk individuals, from controls. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2015;86(1):32–37.
26. Sringean J, Taechalertpaisarn P, Thanawattano C, Bhidayasiri R. How well do Parkinson's disease patients turn in bed? Quantitative analysis of nocturnal hypokinesia using multisite wearable inertial sensors. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2016;23:10–16.
27. Bourke AK, O'Donovan KJ, Nelson J, GM OL. Fall-detection through vertical velocity thresholding using a tri-axial accelerometer characterized using an optical motion-capture system. Annual International Conference Procedings of IEEE EMBS IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Annual Conference 2008:2832-2835.
28. Bourke AK, Torrent M, Parra X, Catala A, Nelson J. Fall algorithm development using kinematic parameters measured from simulated falls performed in a quasi-realistic environment using accelerometry. Annual International Conference Procedings of IEEE EMBS IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Annual Conference 2011:4449-4452.
29. Bourke AK, van de Ven P, Gamble M, et al. Assessment of waist-worn tri-axial accelerometer based fall-detection algorithms using continuous unsupervised activities. Annual International Conference Procedings of IEEE EMBS IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Annual Conference 2010:2782-2785.
30. Kangas M, Konttila A, Lindgren P, Winblad I, Jamsa T. Comparison of low-complexity fall detection algorithms for body attached accelerometers. Gait Posture 2008;28(2):285–291.
31. Kangas M, Konttila A, Winblad I, Jamsa T. Determination of simple thresholds for accelerometry-based parameters for fall detection. Annual International Conference Procedings of IEEE EMBS IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Annual Conference 2007:1367-1370.
32. Kangas M, Korpelainen R, Vikman I, Nyberg L, Jamsa T. Sensitivity and false alarm rate of a fall sensor in long-term fall detection in the elderly. Gerontology 2015;61(1):61–68.
33. Henderson EJ, Lord SR, Close JC, Lawrence AD, Whone A, Ben-Shlomo Y. The ReSPonD trial—rivastigmine to stabilise gait in Parkinson's disease a phase II, randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial to evaluate the effect of rivastigmine on gait in patients with Parkinson's disease who have fallen. BMC Neurol 2013;13:188.
34. Markle-Reid M, Browne G, Gafni A, et al. A cross-sectional study of the prevalence, correlates, and costs of falls in older home care clients ‘at risk’ for falling. Can J Aging 2010;29(1):119–137.
35. Weiss A, Brozgol M, Dorfman M, et al. Does the evaluation of gait quality during daily life provide insight into fall risk? A novel approach using 3-day accelerometer recordings. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2013;27(8):742–752.
36. Weiss A, Herman T, Giladi N, Hausdorff JM. Objective assessment of fall risk in Parkinson's disease using a body-fixed sensor worn for 3 days. PloS ONE 2014;9(5):e96675.
37. van Schooten KS, Pijnappels M, Rispens SM, Elders PJ, Lips P, van Dieen JH. Ambulatory fall-risk assessment: amount and quality of daily-life gait predict falls in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2015;70(5):608–615.
38. Rispens SM, van Schooten KS, Pijnappels M, Daffertshofer A, Beek PJ, van Dieen JH. Identification of fall risk predictors in daily life measurements: gait characteristics' reliability and association with self-reported fall history. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2015;29(1):54–61.
39. Mactier K, Lord S, Godfrey A, Burn D, Rochester L. The relationship between real world ambulatory activity and falls in incident Parkinson's disease: influence of classification scheme. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2015;21(3):236–242.
40. Brodie M, Lord S, Coppens M, Annegarn J, Delbaere K. Eight weeks remote monitoring using a freely worn device reveals unstable gait patterns in older fallers. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2015;62(11):2588–2594.
41. Hiorth YH, Larsen JP, Lode K, et al. Impact of falls on physical activity in people with Parkinson's disease. J Parkinsons Dis 2016;6(1):175–182.
42. Snijders AH, Haaxma CA, Hagen YJ, Munneke M, Bloem BR. Freezer or non-freezer: clinical assessment of freezing of gait. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2012;18(2):149–154.
43. Moore ST, Yungher DA, Morris TR, et al. Autonomous identification of freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease from lower-body segmental accelerometry. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2013;10:19.
44. Tripoliti EE, Tzallas AT, Tsipouras MG, et al. Automatic detection of freezing of gait events in patients with Parkinson's disease. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2013;110(1):12–26.
45. Weiss A, Herman T, Giladi N, Hausdorff JM. New evidence for gait abnormalities among Parkinson's disease patients who suffer from freezing of gait: insights using a body-fixed sensor worn for 3 days. J Neural Transm (Vienna, Austria: 1996) 2015;122(3):403–410.
46. Lord S, Galna B, Verghese J, Coleman S, Burn D, Rochester L. Independent domains of gait in older adults and associated motor and nonmotor attributes: validation of a factor analysis approach. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2013;68(7):820–827.
47. Lord S, Galna B, Rochester L. Moving forward on gait measurement: toward a more refined approach. Mov Disord 2013;28(11):1534–1543.
48. Mollenhauer B, Rochester L, Chen-Plotkin A, Brooks D. What can biomarkers tell us about cognition in Parkinson's disease? Mov Disord 2014;29(5):622–633.
49. Del Din S, Godfrey A, Galna B, Lord S, Rochester L. Free-living gait characteristics in ageing and Parkinson's disease: impact of environment and ambulatory bout length. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2016;13:46.
50. Salarian A, Russmann H, Vingerhoets FJ, et al. Gait assessment in Parkinson's disease: toward an ambulatory system for long-term monitoring. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2004;51(8):1434–1443.
51. Esser P, Dawes H, Collett J, Feltham MG, Howells K. Validity and inter-rater reliability of inertial gait measurements in Parkinson's disease: a pilot study. J Neurosci Methods 2012;205(1):177–181.
52. Esser P, Dawes H, Collett J, Feltham MG, Howells K. Assessment of spatio-temporal gait parameters using inertial measurement units in neurological populations. Gait Posture 2011;34(4):558–560.
53. Del Din S, Godfrey A, Rochester L. Validation of an accelerometer to quantify a comprehensive battery of gait characteristics in healthy older adults and Parkinson's disease: toward clinical and at home use. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 2016;20(3):838–847.
54. Trojaniello D, Cereatti A, Pelosin E, et al. Estimation of step-by-step spatio-temporal parameters of normal and impaired gait using shank-mounted magneto-inertial sensors: application to elderly, hemiparetic, parkinsonian and choreic gait. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2014;11:152.
55. Trojaniello D, Ravaschio A, Hausdorff JM, Cereatti A. Comparative assessment of different methods for the estimation of gait temporal parameters using a single inertial sensor: application to elderly, post-stroke, Parkinson's disease and Huntington's disease subjects. Gait Posture 2015;42(3):310–316.
56. Brodie MA, Coppens MJ, Lord SR, et al. Wearable pendant device monitoring using new wavelet-based methods shows daily life and laboratory gaits are different. Med Biol Eng Comput 2016;54(4):663–674.
57. Weiss A, Sharifi S, Plotnik M, van Vugt JP, Giladi N, Hausdorff JM. Toward automated, at-home assessment of mobility among patients with Parkinson disease, using a body-worn accelerometer. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2011;25(9):810–818.
58. Cancela J, Pastorino M, Arredondo MT, et al. Gait assessment in Parkinson's disease patients through a network of wearable accelerometers in unsupervised environments. Annual International Conference Procedings of IEEE EMBS IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Annual Conference 2011:2233-2236.
59. Cancela J, Pastorino M, Arredondo MT, Nikita KS, Villagra F, Pastor MA. Feasibility study of a wearable system based on a wireless body area network for gait assessment in Parkinson's disease patients. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 2014;14(3):4618–4633.
60. Weiss A, Herman T, Giladi N, Hausdorff JM. Association between community ambulation walking patterns and cognitive function in patients with Parkinson's disease: further insights into motor-cognitive links. Parkinson's Dis 2015;2015:547065.
61. Herman T, Weiss A, Brozgol M, Giladi N, Hausdorff JM. Gait and balance in Parkinson's disease subtypes: objective measures and classification considerations. J Neurol 2014;261(12):2401–2410.
62. Zampieri C, Salarian A, Carlson-Kuhta P, Nutt JG, Horak FB. Assessing mobility at home in people with early Parkinson's disease using an instrumented Timed Up and Go test. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2011;17(4):277–280.
63. Smith E, Walsh L, Doyle J, Greene B, Blake C. The reliability of the quantitative timed up and go test (QTUG) measured over five consecutive days under single and dual-task conditions in community dwelling older adults. Gait Posture 2016;43:239–244.
64. Mancini M, El-Gohary M, Pearson S, et al. Continuous monitoring of turning in Parkinson's disease: rehabilitation potential. NeuroRehabilitation 2015;37(1):3–10.
65. El-Gohary M, Pearson S, McNames J, et al. Continuous monitoring of turning in patients with movement disability. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 2013;14(1):356–369.
66. Lord S, Godfrey A, Galna B, Mhiripiri D, Burn D, Rochester L. Ambulatory activity in incident Parkinson's: more than meets the eye? J Neurol 2013;260(12):2964–2972.
67. van Nimwegen M, Speelman AD, Smulders K, et al. Design and baseline characteristics of the ParkFit study, a randomized controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a multifaceted behavioral program to increase physical activity in Parkinson patients. BMC Neurol 2010;10:70.
68. Rochester L, Chastin SF, Lord S, Baker K, Burn DJ. Understanding the impact of deep brain stimulation on ambulatory activity in advanced Parkinson's disease. J Neurol 2012;259(6):1081–1086.
69. Chastin SFM, Granat MH. Methods for objective measure, quantification and analysis of sedentary behaviour and inactivity. Gait Posture 2010;31(1):82–86.
70. Dontje ML, de Greef MH, Speelman AD, et al. Quantifying daily physical activity and determinants in sedentary patients with Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2013;19(10):878–882.
71. Chastin SFM, Baker K, Jones D, Burn D, Granat MH, Rochester L. The pattern of habitual sedentary behavior is different in advanced Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord 2010;25(13):2114–2120.
72. Cavanaugh JT, Ellis TD, Earhart GM, Ford MP, Foreman KB, Dibble LE. Capturing ambulatory activity decline in Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Phys Ther 2012;36(2):51–57.
73. Cavanaugh JT, Ellis TD, Earhart GM, Ford MP, Foreman KB, Dibble LE. Toward understanding ambulatory activity decline in Parkinson disease. Phys Ther 2015;95(8):1142–1150.
74. Lim I, van Wegen E, Jones D, et al. Does cueing training improve physical activity in patients with Parkinson's disease? Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010;24(5):469–477.
75. Giuffrida JP, Riley DE, Maddux BN, Heldman DA. Clinically deployable Kinesia technology for automated tremor assessment. Mov Disord 2009;24(5):723–730.
76. Cancela J, Pastorino M, Tzallas AT, et al. Wearability assessment of a wearable system for Parkinson's disease remote monitoring based on a body area network of sensors. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 2014;14(9):17235–17255.
77. Orendurff MS, Schoen JA, Bernatz GC, Segal AD, Klute GK. How humans walk: bout duration, steps per bout, and rest duration. Journal of rehabilitation research and development 2008;45(7):1077–1089.
78. Barry G, Galna B, Lord S, Rochester L, Godfrey A. Defining ambulatory bouts in free-living activity: Impact of brief stationary periods on bout metrics. Gait Posture 2015;42(4):594–597.
79. Evenson KR, Goto MM, Furberg RD. Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer-wearable activity trackers. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2015;12(1):159.
80. Taraldsen K, Chastin SFM, Riphagen II, Vereijken B, Helbostad JL. Physical activity monitoring by use of accelerometer-based body-worn sensors in older adults: a systematic literature review of current knowledge and applications. Maturitas 2012;71(1):13–19.
81. Storm FA, Heller BW, Mazza C. Step detection and activity recognition accuracy of seven physical activity monitors. PloS ONE 2015;10(3):e0118723.
82. Picerno P, Cereatti A, Cappozzo A. A spot check for assessing static orientation consistency of inertial and magnetic sensing units. Gait Posture 2011;33(3):373–378.
83. Godfrey A, Lara J, Munro CA, et al. Instrumented assessment of test battery for physical capability using an accelerometer: a feasibility study. Physiol Meas 2015;36(5):N71–N83.
84. Cheng Z, Li P, Wang J, Guo S. Just-in-Time code offloading for wearable computing. IEEE Trans Emerg Top Comput 2015;3(1):74–83.
85. Steins D, Sheret I, Dawes H, Esser P, Collett J. A smart device inertial-sensing method for gait analysis. J Biomech 2014;47(15):3780–3785.
86. Tsanas A, Little MA, McSharry PE, Ramig LO. Accurate telemonitoring of Parkinson's disease progression by noninvasive speech tests. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2010;57(4):884–893.
87. Piro NE, Baumann L, Tengler M, Piro L, Blechschmidt-Trapp R. Telemonitoring of patients with Parkinson's disease using inertia sensors. Appl Clin Inform 2014;5(2):503–511.
88. Brouillette RM, Foil H, Fontenot S, et al. Feasibility, reliability, and validity of a smartphone based application for the assessment of cognitive function in the elderly. PloS ONE 2013;8(6):e65925.
89. Liddle J, Ireland D, McBride SJ, et al. Measuring the lifespace of people with Parkinson's disease using smartphones: proof of principle. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2014;2(1):e13.
90. Vayena E, Tasioulas J. Adapting standards: ethical oversight of participant-led health research. PLoS Med 2013;10(3):e1001402.
91. Kelly P, Marshall SJ, Badland H, et al. An ethical framework for automated, wearable cameras in health behavior research. Am J Prev Med 2013;44(3):314–319.
92. Heldman DA, Giuffrida JP, Chen R, et al. The modified bradykinesia rating scale for Parkinson's disease: reliability and comparison with kinematic measures. Mov Disord 2011;26(10):1859–1863.
93. Fisher JM, Hammerla NY, Rochester L, Andras P, Walker RW. Body-worn sensors in Parkinson's disease: evaluating their acceptability to patients. Telemed J E Health 2016;22(1):63–69.
94. Prudon B, Duncan GW, Khoo TK, Yarnall AJ, Anderson KN. Primary sleep disorder prevalence in patients with newly diagnosed Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord 2014;29(2):259–262.
95. Bossenbroek L, Kosse N, Ten Hacken N, Gordijn M, Van der Hoeven J, De Greef M. Validation of the DynaPort MiniMod during sleep: a pilot study. Percept Mot Skills 2010;111(3):936–946.
96. Godfrey A, Culhane KM, Lyons GM. Comparison of the performance of the activPAL Professional physical activity logger to a discrete accelerometer-based activity monitor. Med Eng Phys 2007;29(8):930–934.
97. Larkin L, Nordgren B, Purtill H, Brand C, Fraser A, Kennedy N. Criterion validity of the ActivPAL activity monitor for sedentary and physical activity patterns in people who have rheumatoid arthritis [published online ahead of print December 4, 2015]. Phys Ther 2015.
98. Dijkstra B, Kamsma Y, Zijlstra W. Detection of gait and postures using a miniaturised triaxial accelerometer-based system: accuracy in community-dwelling older adults. Age Ageing 2010;39(2):259–262.
99. Kangas M, Vikman I, Wiklander J, Lindgren P, Nyberg L, Jamsa T. Sensitivity and specificity of fall detection in people aged 40 years and over. Gait Posture 2009;29(4):571–574.
100. Pansera M, Estrada JJ, Pastor L, Cancela J, Greenlaw R, Arredondo MT. Multi-parametric system for the continuous assessment and monitoring of motor status in Parkinson's disease: an entropy-based gait comparison. Annual International Conference Procedings of IEEE EMBS IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Annual Conference 2009:1242-1245.
101. Salarian A, Russmann H, Vingerhoets FJ, Burkhard PR, Aminian K. Ambulatory monitoring of physical activities in patients with Parkinson's disease. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2007;54(12):2296–2299.
102. Bouten CV, Verboeket-van de Venne WP, Westerterp KR, Verduin M, Janssen JD. Daily physical activity assessment: comparison between movement registration and doubly labeled water. J Appl Phys (Bethesda, MD: 1985) 1996;81(2):1019–1026.
103. Benka Wallen M, Franzen E, Nero H, Hagstromer M. Levels and Patterns of Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in Elderly People With Mild to Moderate Parkinson Disease. Phys Ther 2015;95(8):1135–1141.
104. Peterson NE, Sirard JR, Kulbok PA, DeBoer MD, Erickson JM. Validation of accelerometer thresholds and inclinometry for measurement of sedentary behavior in young adult university students. Res Nurs Health 2015;38(6):492–499.
105. White DK, Wagenaar RC, Ellis T. Monitoring activity in individuals with Parkinson disease: a validity study. J Neurol Phys Ther 2006;30(1):12–21.
106. Schmidt AL, Pennypacker ML, Thrush AH, Leiper CI, Craik RL. Validity of the StepWatch Step Activity Monitor: preliminary findings for use in persons with Parkinson disease and multiple sclerosis. J Geriatr Phys Ther (2001) 2011;34(1):41–45.
107. Galna B, Lord S, Burn DJ, Rochester L. Progression of gait dysfunction in incident Parkinson's disease: impact of medication and phenotype. Mov Disord 2015;30(3):359–367.