Proteome-wide association studies identify biochemical modules associated with a wing-size phenotype in Drosophila melanogaster

Nature Communications

Volumn 7, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Okada, Hirokazu ^a   Ebhardt, H Alexander ^a   Vonesch, Sibylle Chantal ^a   Aebersold, Ruedi ^a,b   Hafen, Ernst ^a,b  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HISTONE; PROTEOME; DROSOPHILA PROTEIN; GLUCOSE;

BIOCHEMISTRY; FLY; GENETIC VARIATION; GLUCOSE; METABOLISM; MITOCHONDRION; PHENOTYPE; PROTEOMICS;

ADULT; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOCHEMISTRY; BIOGENESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; GENE ONTOLOGY; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOTYPE PHENOTYPE CORRELATION; IMAGINAL DISC; MASS SPECTROMETRY; METABOLISM; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PHENOTYPIC VARIATION; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEOME WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; RIBOSOME; WING; ANIMAL; EMBRYOLOGY; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; MITOCHONDRION; PHYSIOLOGY;

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER;

ANIMALS; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; DROSOPHILA PROTEINS; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; GLUCOSE; IMAGINAL DISCS; MITOCHONDRIA; WINGS, ANIMAL;

EID: 84984871169     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12649     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Oldham, S., Bohni, R., Stocker, H., Brogiolo, W. & Hafen, E. Genetic control of size in Drosophila. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 355, 945-952 (2000).
2. Tumaneng, K., Russell, R. C. & Guan, K. L. Organ size control by Hippo and TOR pathways. Curr. Biol. 22, R368-R379 (2012).
3. Lander, A. D. Pattern, growth, and control. Cell 144, 955-969 (2011).
4. Laplante, M. & Sabatini, D. M. mTOR signaling in growth control and disease. Cell 149, 274-293 (2012).
5. Edgar, B. A. How flies get their size: genetics meets physiology. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7, 907-916 (2006).
6. Johnston, L. A. & Gallant, P. Control of growth and organ size in Drosophila. Bioessays 24, 54-64 (2002).
7. Visscher, P. M., Brown, M. A., McCarthy, M. I. & Yang, J. Five years of GWAS discovery. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 90, 7-24 (2012).
8. Hindorff, L. A. et al. Potential etiologic and functional implications of genomewide association loci for human diseases and traits. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 9362-9367 (2009).
9. Mackay, T. F. et al. The Drosophila melanogaster genetic reference panel. Nature 482, 173-178 (2012).
10. Massouras, A. et al. Genomic variation and its impact on gene expression in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Genet. 8, e1003055 (2012).
11. Huang, W. et al. Natural variation in genome architecture among 205 Drosophila melanogaster genetic reference panel lines. Genome Res. 24, 1193-1208 (2014).
12. McCarthy, M. I. & Hirschhorn, J. N. Genome-wide association studies: potential next steps on a genetic journey. Hum. Mol. Genet. 17, R156-R165 (2008).
13. Thomas, D. Gene-environment-wide association studies: emerging approaches. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 259-272 (2010).
14. Vilhjalmsson, B. J. & Nordborg, M. The nature of confounding in genome-wide association studies. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14, 1-2 (2013).
15. Wu, Y. et al. Multilayered genetic and omics dissection of mitochondrial activity in a mouse reference population. Cell 158, 1415-1430 (2014).
16. Liu, Y. et al. Quantitative variability of 342 plasma proteins in a human twin population. Mol. Syst. Biol. 11, 786 (2015).
17. Gillet, L. C. et al. Targeted data extraction of the MS/MS spectra generated by data-independent acquisition: a new concept for consistent and accurate proteome analysis. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 11, O111 016717 (2012).
18. Guo, T. et al. Rapid mass spectrometric conversion of tissue biopsy samples into permanent quantitative digital proteome maps. Nat. Med. 21, 407-413 (2015).
19. Rost, H. L. et al. OpenSWATH enables automated, targeted analysis of dataindependent acquisition MS data. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 219-223 (2014).
20. Loewith, R. & Hall, M. N. Target of rapamycin (TOR) in nutrient signaling and growth control. Genetics 189, 1177-1201 (2011).
21. Duvel, K. et al. Activation of a metabolic gene regulatory network downstream of mTOR complex 1. Mol. Cell 39, 171-183 (2010).
22. Cunningham, J. T. et al. mTOR controls mitochondrial oxidative function through a YY1-PGC-1alpha transcriptional complex. Nature 450, 736-740 (2007).
23. Rattray, A. M. & Muller, B. The control of histone gene expression. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 40, 880-885 (2012).
24. Stranger, B. E. et al. Relative impact of nucleotide and copy number variation on gene expression phenotypes. Science 315, 848-853 (2007).
25. Wu, L. et al. Variation and genetic control of protein abundance in humans. Nature 499, 79-82 (2013).
26. Mackay, T. F., Stone, E. A. & Ayroles, J. F. The genetics of quantitative traits: challenges and prospects. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10, 565-577 (2009).
27. Ghazalpour, A. et al. Comparative analysis of proteome and transcriptome variation in mouse. PLoS Genet. 7, e1001393 (2011).
28. Gygi, S. P., Rochon, Y., Franza, B. R. & Aebersold, R. Correlation between protein and mRNA abundance in yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 1720-1730 (1999).
29. Schwanhausser, B. et al. Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control. Nature 473, 337-342 (2011).
30. Battle, A. et al. Genomic variation. Impact of regulatory variation from RNA to protein. Science 347, 664-667 (2015).
31. Brunner, E. et al. A high-quality catalog of the Drosophila melanogaster proteome. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 576-583 (2007).
32. Vonesch, S. C., Lamparter, D., Mackay, T. F., Bergmann, S. & Hafen, E. Genome-wide analysis reveals novel regulators of growth in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Genet. 12, e1005616 (2016).
33. Houle, D., Mezey, J., Galpern, P. & Carter, A. Automated measurement of Drosophila wings. BMC Evol. Biol. 3, 25 (2003).
34. Schubert, O. T. et al. Building high-quality assay libraries for targeted analysis of SWATH MS data. Nat. Protoc. 10, 426-441 (2015).
35. Collins, B. C. et al. Quantifying protein interaction dynamics by SWATH mass spectrometry: application to the 14-3-3 system. Nat. Methods 10, 1246-1253 (2013).
36. Keller, A., Nesvizhskii, A. I., Kolker, E. & Aebersold, R. Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Anal. Chem. 74, 5383-5392 (2002).
37. Rost, H. L., Schmitt, U., Aebersold, R. & Malmstrom, L. pyOpenMS: a Pythonbased interface to the OpenMS mass-spectrometry algorithm library. Proteomics 14, 74-77 (2014).
38. Kunszt, P. et al. iPortal: the swiss grid proteomics portal: requirements and new features based on experience and usability considerations. Concurr. Comput. Pract. E. 27, 433-445 (2015).
39. Bauch, A. et al. openBIS: a flexible framework for managing and analyzing complex data in biology research. BMC Bioinformatics 12, 468 (2011).
40. Mevik, B. H. & Wehrens, R. The pls package: principal component and partial least squares regression in R. J. Stat. Softw. 18, 1-23 (2007).