Is a grooved collar implant design superior to a machined design regarding bone level alteration? An observational pilot study

Quintessence International

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 221-229

  Bassetti, Renzo ^a   Kaufmann, Regula ^a   Ebinger, Andreas ^a   Mericske Stern, Regina ^a   Enkling, Norbert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Implant collar; Implant collar design; Microgrooves

Indexed keywords

TOOTH IMPLANT;

ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MANDIBLE; PILOT STUDY; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RADIOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANT;

ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MANDIBLE; PILOT PROJECTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 84984851153     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3290/j.qi.a31208     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Holm-Pedersen P, Lang NP, Muller F. What are the longevities of teeth and oral implants? Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18(Suppl 3):15-19
2. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25
3. Albrektsson T, Zarb GA. Current interpretations of the osseointegrated response: clinical significance. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:95-105
4. Albrektsson T, Isidor F. Consensus report of session I. In: Lang NP, Karring T (eds). Proceeds of the 1st European Workshop on Periodontology. London: Quintessence, 1994:365-369
5. Roos J, Sennerby L, Lekholm U, Jemt T, Grondahl K, Albrektsson T. A qualitative and quantitative method for evaluating implant success: a 5-year retrospective analysis of the Branemark implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:504-514
6. Jemt T, Friberg B, Rieben AS. Comparison of radiographic baselines and loading protocols utilized in implant studies. Barcelona: International Association for Dental Research, 2010
7. Cardaropoli G, Lekholm U, Wennstrom JL. Tissue alterations at implant-supported single-tooth replacements: a 1-year prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:165-171
8. Cooper LF, Ellner S, Moriarty J, et al. Three-year evaluation of single-tooth implants restored 3 weeks after 1-stage surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:791-800
9. Manz MC. Factors associated with radiographic vertical bone loss around implants placed in a clinical study. Ann Periodontol 2000;5:137-151
10. Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I, Lindhe J. Bone reactions to longstanding functional load at implants: an experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32:925-932
11. Engquist B, Astrand P, Dahlgren S, Engquist E, Feldmann H, Grondahl K. Marginal bone reaction to oral implants: a prospective comparative study of Astra Tech and Branemark System implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:30-37
12. Laurell L, Lundgren D. Marginal bone level changes at dental implants after 5 years in function: a meta-analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2011;13:19-28
13. Hansson S. The implant neck: smooth or provided with retention elements. A biomechanical approach. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999;10:394-405
14. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T. Tissue characteristics at microthreaded implants: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2006;8:107-113
15. Lee DW, Choi YS, Park KH, Kim CS, Moon IS. Effect of microthread on the maintenance of marginal bone level: a 3-year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:465-470
16. Shin YK, Han CH, Heo SJ, Kim S, Chun HJ. Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone level around implants with different neck designs after 1 year. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:789-794
17. Cochran DL, Bosshardt DD, Grize L, et al. Bone response to loaded implants with non-matching implant-abutment diameters in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 2009;80:609-617
18. O'Leary TJ, Drake RB, Naylor JE. The plaque control record. J Periodontol 1972;43:38
19. Ainamo J, Bay I. Problems and proposals for recording gingivitis and plaque. Int Dent J 1975;25:229-235
20. Brunner ESD, Langer F (eds). Nonparametric Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Factorial Experiments. New York: Wiley Interscience, 2002
21. Rasouli Ghahroudi A, Talaeepour A, Mesgarzadeh A, et al. Radiographic vertical bone loss evaluation around dental implants following one year of functional loading. J Dent (Tehran) 2010;7:89-97
22. Albandar JM. Validity and reliability of alveolar bone level measurements made on dry skulls. J Clin Periodontol 1989;16:575-579
23. Deppe H, Wagenpfeil S, Donath K. Comparative value of attachment measurements in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:208-215
24. Hermann JS, Schoolfield JD, Nummikoski PV, Buser D, Schenk RK, Cochran DL. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants: a methodologic study comparing linear radiographic with histometric measurements. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:475-485
25. Schulze R, Krummenauer F, Schalldach F, d'Hoedt B. Precision and accuracy of measurements in digital panoramic radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2000;29:52-56
26. Hermann JS, Buser D, Schenk RK, Cochran DL. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 2000;71:1412-1424
27. Jung RE, Jones AA, Higginbottom FL, et al. The influence of non-matching implant and abutment diameters on radiographic crestal bone levels in dogs. J Periodontol 2008;79:260-270
28. Tawil G, Aboujaoude N, Younan R. Influence of prosthetic parameters on the survival and complication rates of short implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:275-282
29. Comfort MB, Chu FC, Chai J, Wat PY, Chow TW. A 5-year prospective study on small diameter screw-shaped oral implants. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:341-345
30. Polizzi G, Fabbro S, Furri M, Herrmann I, Squarzoni S. Clinical application of narrow Branemark System implants for single-tooth restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:496-503
31. Romeo E, Lops D, Amorfini L, Chiapasco M, Ghisolfi M, Vogel G. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of small-diameter (3.3-mm) implants followed for 1-7 years: a longitudinal study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:139-148
32. Albrektsson T, Isidor F. Consensus report of session I. In: Lang NP, Karring T (eds). Preceeds of the 1st European Workshop on Periodontology. London: Quintessence, 1994:365-369
33. Rieben AS, Jannu A, Alifanz J, Noro A, Sahlin H. Comparison of various study protocols. A literature review. 25th Anniversary Meeting of the Academy of Osseointegration. Orlando, 2010
34. Astrand P, Engquist B, Dahlgren S, Engquist E, Feldmann H, Grondahl K. Astra Tech and Branemark System implants: a prospective 5-year comparative study. Results after one year. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 1999;1:17-26
35. Kielbassa AM, Martinez-de Fuentes R, Goldstein M, et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing a variable-thread novel tapered and a standard tapered implant: interim one-year results. J Prosthet Dent 2009;101:293-305
36. Enkling N, Johren P, Klimberg T, et al. Open or submerged healing of implants with platform switching: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 2011;38:374-384
37. Astrand P, Engquist B, Dahlgren S, Grondahl K, Engquist E, Feldmann H. Astra Tech and Branemark system implants: a 5-year prospective study of marginal bone reactions. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:413-420
38. Maeda Y, Miura J, Taki I, Sogo M. Biomechanical analysis on platform switching: is there any biomechanical rationale? Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:581-584
39. Duyck J, Ronold HJ, Van Oosterwyck H, Naert I, Vander Sloten J, Ellingsen JE. The influence of static and dynamic loading on marginal bone reactions around osseointegrated implants: an animal experimental study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:207-218
40. Rompen E, Domken O, Degidi M, Pontes AE, Piattelli A. The effect of material characteristics, of surface topography and of implant components and connections on soft tissue integration: a literature review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17(Suppl 2):55-67
41. Schroeder A, van der Zypen E, Stich H, Sutter F. The reactions of bone, connective tissue, and epithelium to endosteal implants with titanium-sprayed surfaces. J Maxillofac Surg 1981;9:15-25
42. Deporter DA, Watson PA, Pilliar RM, Howley TP, Winslow J. A histological evaluation of a functional endosseous, porous-surfaced, titanium alloy dental implant system in the dog. J Dent Res 1988;67:1190-1195
43. Buser D, Weber HP, Donath K, Fiorellini JP, Paquette DW, Williams RC. Soft tissue reactions to non-submerged unloaded titanium implants in beagle dogs. J Periodontol 1992;63:225-235
44. Schupbach P, Glauser R. The defense architecture of the human periimplant mucosa: a histological study. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97:S15-25
45. Chehroudi B, Gould TR, Brunette DM. Effects of a grooved titanium-coated implant surface on epithelial cell behavior in vitro and in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res 1989;23:1067-1085
46. Werner S, Huck O, Frisch B, et al. The effect of microstructured surfaces and laminin-derived peptide coatings on soft tissue interactions with titanium dental implants. Biomaterials 2009;30:2291-2301
47. Abrahamsson I, Zitzmann NU, Berglundh T, Linder E, Wennerberg A, Lindhe J. The mucosal attachment to titanium implants with different surface characteristics: an experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29:448-455
48. Allegrini S Jr, Allegrini MR, Yoshimoto M, et al. Soft tissue integration in the neck area of titanium implants: an animal trial. J Physiol Pharmacol 2008;59(Suppl 5):117-132