Corrigendum to “Bioculturally valuable but not necessarily worth the price: Integrating different dimensions of value of urban green spaces” (Urban Forestry & Urban Greening (2016) 20 (89–96), (S1618866716300589) (10.1016/j.ufug.2016.07.010));Bioculturally valuable but not necessarily worth the price: Integrating different dimensions of value of urban green spaces

Urban Forestry and Urban Greening

Volumn 20, Issue , 2016, Pages 89-96

  Czembrowski, Piotr ^a   Łaszkiewicz, Edyta ^a   Kronenberg, Jakub ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LODZ   (Poland)

Author keywords

Biocultural diversity; Hedonic pricing model; Integrated valuation; Poland; Spatial quantile regression; Urban green space

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CULTURAL HERITAGE; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; GREENSPACE; PRICE DETERMINATION; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; URBAN ECOSYSTEM; URBAN REGION; VALUATION;

POLAND [CENTRAL EUROPE];

EID: 84984794840     PISSN: 16188667     EISSN: 16108167     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.08.010     Document Type: Erratum

References (45)

1. Anderson, S.T., West, S.E., Open space, residential property values, and spatial context. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 36 (2006), 773–789, 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2006.03.007.
2. Anselin, L., Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. 2013, Springer, Berlin.
3. Anthon, S., Thorsen, B.J., Helles, F., Urban-fringe afforestation projects and taxable hedonic values. Urban For. Urban Green. 3 (2005), 79–91, 10.1016/j.ufug.2004.09.004.
4. Berbelska, D., Pytlas, S., Salm, J., Zielińska, A., Księży Młyn. 1998, Łódź City Office, Łódź.
5. Brander, L.M., Koetse, M.J., The value of urban open space: meta-analyses of contingent valuation and hedonic pricing results. J. Environ. Manag. 92 (2011), 2763–2773, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.019.
6. Can, A., The measurement of neighborhood dynamics in urban house prices. Econ. Geogr. 66 (1990), 254–272, 10.2307/143400.
7. Chernozhukov, V., Hansen, C., Instrumental quantile regression inference for structural and treatment effect models. J. Econom. 132 (2006), 491–525, 10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.02.009.
8. Cocks, M., Biocultural diversity: moving beyond the realm of indigenous and local people. Hum. Ecol. 34 (2006), 185–200, 10.1007/s10745-006-9013-5.
9. Czembrowski, P., Kronenberg, J., Hedonic pricing and different urban green space types and sizes: Insights into the discussion on valuing ecosystem services. Landsc. Urban Plan. 146 (2016), 11–19, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.10.005.
10. Dubin, R.A., Estimation of regression coefficients in the presence of spatially autocorrelated error terms. Rev. Econ. Stat. 70 (1988), 466–474, 10.2307/1926785.
11. Ebru, Ç., Eban, A., Determinants of house prices in Istanbul: a quantile regression approach. Qual. Quant. 45 (2009), 305–317, 10.1007/s11135-009-9296-x.
12. Elands, B.H.M., Wiersum, K.F., Buijs, A.E., Vierikko, K., Policy interpretations and manifestation of biocultural diversity in urbanized Europe: conservation of lived biodiversity. Biodivers. Conserv. 24 (2015), 3347–3366, 10.1007/s10531-015-0985-6.
13. Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Challenges and Opportunities. Elmqvist, T., Fragkias, M., Goodness, J., Güneralp, B., Marcotullio, P.J., McDonald, R.I., Parnell, S., Schewenius, M., Sendstad, M., Seto, K.C., Wilkinson, C., (eds.), 2013, Springer, Dordrecht.
14. Gómez-Baggethun, E., Martín-López, B., Barton, D., Braat, L., Kelemen, E., García-Llorente, M., Saarikoski, H., van den Bergh, J., Arias, P., Berry, P., Potschin, M., Dunford, R., Keune, H., Schröter-Schlaack, C., Harrison, P., State-of-the-art Report on Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services EU FP7., 2014, OpenNESS Project Deliverable 4.1, Barcelona.
15. Goodman, A.C., Andrew Court and the invention of hedonic price analysis. J. Urban Econ. 44 (1998), 291–298, 10.1006/juec.1997.2071.
16. Hładysz, N., Analiza rynku nieruchomości miasta Łódź. 2013, Instytut Gospodarki Nieruchomościami, Katowice.
17. Heckman, J.J., Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47 (1979), 153–161, 10.2307/1912352.
18. Hubacek, K., Kronenberg, J., Synthesizing different perspectives on the value of urban ecosystem services. Landsc. Urban Plan. 109 (2013), 1–6, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.010.
19. Kaczmarek, J., Liszewski, S., Włodarczyk, B., Strategia rozwoju turystyki w Łodzi. Łódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe. 2006, Łódźike.
20. Kim, T.-H., Muller, C., Two-stage quantile regression when the first stage is based on quantile regression. Econom. J. 7 (2004), 218–231, 10.1111/j.1368-423X.2004.00128.x.
21. Kim, H.-G., Hung, K.-C., Park, S.Y., Determinants of housing prices in Hong Kong: A Box-Cox quantile regression approach. J. Real Estate Finance Econ. 50 (2014), 270–287, 10.1007/s11146-014-9456-1.
22. Kong, F., Yin, H., Nakagoshi, N., Using GIS and landscape metrics in the hedonic price modeling of the amenity value of urban green space: a case study in Jinan City. Chin. Landsc. Urban Plan. 79 (2007), 240–252, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.02.013.
23. Kostov, P., A spatial quantile regression hedonic model of agricultural land prices. Spat. Econ. Anal. 4 (2009), 53–72, 10.1080/17421770802625957.
24. Kronenberg, J., What can the current debate on ecosystem services learn from the past? lessons from economic ornithology. Geoforum 55 (2014), 164–177, 10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.06.011.
25. Larson, E.K., Perrings, C., The value of water-related amenities in an arid city: the case of the Phoenix Metropolitan Area. Landsc. Urban Plan. 109 (2013), 45–55, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.008.
26. LeSage, J.P., An introduction to spatial econometrics. Revue d'Economie Industrielle 123 (2008), 19–44, 10.4000/rei.3887.
27. Liao, W.-C., Wang, X., Hedonic house prices and spatial quantile regression. J. Hous. Econ. 21 (2012), 16–27, 10.1016/j.jhe.2011.11.001.
28. Liszewski, S., (eds.) Łódź −a monograph of the city, 2009, Łódź Scientific Society, Łódź.
29. Mak, S., Choy, L., Ho, W., Quantile regression estimates of Hong Kong real estate prices. Urban Stud., 2010, 10.1177/0042098009359032.
30. Melichar, J., Kaprová, K., Revealing preferences of Prague's homebuyers towards greenery amenities: the empirical evidence of distance-size effect. Landsc. Urban Plan. 109 (2013), 56–66, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.09.003.
31. Nordman, E.E., Wagner, J., Public purchases and private preferences: challenges for analyzing public open space acquisitions. Urban For. Urban Green. 11 (2012), 179–186, 10.1016/j.ufug.2011.12.004.
32. Olaczek, R., Bonisławski, R., (eds.) Parki i ogrody Łodzi: ogrody Księżego Młyna, 2008, Stowarzyszenie Film–Przyroda–Kultura Łódź.
33. Olaczek, R., (eds.) Parki i ogrody Łodzi: ogrody nad Łódką, 2010, Stowarzyszenie Film–Przyroda–Kultura Łódź.
34. Ostajewska, M., FILLin project–artistic activities (soundwalks, performances, knees-up, Food for the story) in Księży Młyn, post-industrial district in Łódź. Sztuka i Dokumentacja 12 (2015), 67–77.
35. van Pelt, R.J., Lodz and Getto Litzmannstadt: Promised Land and Croaking Hole of Europe. 2015, Art Gallery of Ontario, Toronto.
36. Sander, H.A., Haight, R.G., Estimating the economic value of cultural ecosystem services in an urbanizing area using hedonic pricing. J. Environ. Manage. 113 (2012), 194–205, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.031.
37. Saphores, J.-D., Li, W., Estimating the value of urban green areas A hedonic pricing analysis of the single family housing market in Los Angeles. CA. Landsc. Urban Plan. 104 (2012), 373–387.
38. Sowinska-Heim J., 2012. The identity of a city. Modern conversion of Karol Scheibler's post-industrial empire in Łódź. Proceedings in ARSA −Advanced Research in Scientific Areas 1, 1240–1245.
39. Tajima, K., New estimates of the demand for urban green space: implications for valuing the environmental benefits of Boston's Big Dig Project. J. Urban Aff. 25 (2003), 641–655, 10.1111/j.1467-9906.2003.00006.x.
40. Trzpiot, G., Spatial quantile regression. Comp. Econ. Res. 15 (2013), 265–279, 10.2478/v10103-012-0040-8.
41. Tse, R.Y.C., Love, P.E.D., Measuring residential property values in Hong Kong. Prop. Manag. 18 (2000), 366–374, 10.1108/02637470010360669.
42. Tyrväinen, L., The amenity value of the urban forest: an application of the hedonic pricing method. Landsc. Urban Plan. 37 (1997), 211–222, 10.1016/S0169-2046(97)80005-9.
43. Uematsu, H., Khanal, A.R., Mishra, A.K., The impact of natural amenity on farmland values: a quantile regression approach. Land Use Policy 33 (2013), 151–160, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.12.007.
44. Wagner, I., Breil, P., The role of ecohydrology in creating more resilient cities. Ecohydrol. Hydrobiol. 13 (2013), 113–134, 10.1016/j.ecohyd.2013.06.002.
45. Wysmyk-Lamprecht, B., Stobińska, A., Jach, K., Miłosz, M., 2007. Opracowanie ekofizjograficzne sporządzone na potrzeby Studium uwarunkowań i kierunków zagospodarowania przestrzennego miasta Łodzi. Łódź.