Hedonic pricing and different urban green space types and sizes: Insights into the discussion on valuing ecosystem services

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 146, Issue , 2016, Pages 11-19

  Czembrowski, Piotr ^a   Kronenberg, Jakub ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LODZ   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; GREENSPACE; HEDONIC ANALYSIS; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; URBAN PLANNING;

EID: 84946616185     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.10.005     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Anderson L.M., Cordell H.K. Influence of trees on residential property values in Athens, Georgia (U.S.A.): A survey based on actual sales prices. Landscape and Urban Planning 1988, 15:153-164. 10.1016/0169-2046(88)90023-0.
2. Anderson S.T., West S.E. Open space, residential property values, and spatial context. Regional Science and Urban Economics 2006, 36:773-789. 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2006.03.007.
3. Andersson E., Barthel S., Ahrné K. Measuring social-ecological dynamics behind the generation of ecosystem services. Ecological Applications 2007, 17:1267-1278. 10.1890/06-1116.1.
4. Andersson E., McPhearson T., Kremer P., Gomez-Baggethun E., Haase D., Tuvendal M., et al. Scale and context dependence of ecosystem service providing units. Ecosystem Services 2015, 12:157-164. 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.08.001.
5. Recent trends in the real estate market and its analysis, 2013, NBP working paper 2014, Economic Institute, Warsaw. H. Augustyniak, J. Łaszek, Olszewski, K. (Eds.).
6. Hedonic methods in housing markets: Pricing environmental amenities and segregation 2008, Springer, New York, NY. A. Baranzini, J. Ramirez, C. Schaerer, P. Thalmann (Eds.).
7. Basu S., Thibodeau T.G. Analysis of spatial autocorrelation in house prices. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 1998, 17:61-85. 10.1023/A:1007703229507.
8. Baycan T., Nijkamp P. Critical success factors in planning and management of urban green spaces in Europe. International Journal of Sustainable Society 2012, 4:209-225. 10.1504/IJSSOC.2012.047278.
9. Bayer P., Keohane N., Timmins C. Migration and hedonic valuation: The case of air quality. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2009, 58:1-14. 10.1016/j.jeem.2008.08.004.
10. Bengochea Morancho A. A hedonic valuation of urban green areas. Landscape and Urban Planning 2003, 66:35-41. 10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00093-8.
11. Borkowska M., Rozwadowska M., Śleszyński J., Z˙ylicz T. Environmental amenities on the housing market in Warsaw: Hedonic price method research. Ekonomia 2001, 3:70-82.
12. Brander L.M., Koetse M.J. The value of urban open space: Meta-analyses of contingent valuation and hedonic pricing results. Journal of Environmental Management 2011, 92:2763-2773. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.019.
13. Chattopadhyay S. Estimating the demand for air quality: New evidence based on the Chicago housing market. Land Economics 1999, 75:22-38. 10.2307/3146991.
14. Fuller R.A., Gaston K.J. The scaling of green space coverage in European cities. Biology Letters 2009, 5:352-355. 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0010.
15. Fundacja Sendzimira Świez˙e spojrzenie na zieleń: geoankiety-nowe źródło informacji o mieście. Raport z projektu "Licz na zieleń" 2014, Fundacja Sendzimira, Warszawa.
16. Giergiczny M., Kronenberg J. From valuation to governance: Using choice experiment to value street trees. AMBIO 2014, 43:492-501. 10.1007/s13280-014-0516-9.
17. Gómez-Baggethun E., Barton D.N. Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning. Ecological Economics 2013, 86:235-245. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.019.
18. Goodman A.C. Andrew Court and the invention of hedonic price analysis. Journal of Urban Economics 1998, 44:291-298. 10.1006/juec.1997.2071.
19. Hładysz N. Analiza rynku nieruchomości miasta Łódź 2013, Instytut Gospodarki Nieruchomościami, Katowice.
20. Hubacek K., Kronenberg J. Synthesizing different perspectives on the value of urban ecosystem services. Landscape and Urban Planning 2013, 109:1-6. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.010.
21. Jakóbczyk-Gryszkiewicz J., Dyba W., Marcińczak S., Tanaś S. Zagospodarowanie terenów rekreacyjnych w Łodzi: plany, perspektywy 2008, Łódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe, Lodz.
22. Kabisch N., Haase D. Green spaces of European cities revisited for 1990-2006. Landscape and Urban Planning 2013, 110:113-122. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.017.
23. Kim K.S., Park S.J., Kweon Y.-J. Highway traffic noise effects on land price in an urban area. Transportation Research, D: Transport and Environment 2007, 12:275-280. 10.1016/j.trd.2007.03.002.
24. Kong F., Yin H., Nakagoshi N. Using GIS and landscape metrics in the hedonic price modeling of the amenity value of urban green space: A case study in Jinan City, China. Landscape and Urban Planning 2007, 79:240-252. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.02.013.
25. LaRiviere J., Czajkowski M., Hanley N., Aanesen M., Falk-Petersen J., Tinch D. The value of familiarity: Effects of knowledge and objective signals on willingness to pay for a public good. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2014, 68:376-389. 10.1016/j.jeem.2014.07.004.
26. Larson E.K., Perrings C. The value of water-related amenities in an arid city: The case of the Phoenix Metropolitan Area. Landscape and Urban Planning 2013, 109:45-55. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.008.
27. Leggett C.G., Bockstael N.E. Evidence of the effects of water quality on residential land prices. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2000, 39:121-144. 10.1006/jeem.1999.1096.
28. Łowicki D. Wartość krajobrazu w świetle cen terenów pod zabudowę w latach 1995-2000. Ekonomia i Środowisko 2010, 37:147-156.
29. Łowicki D. Land prices as an indicator of the recreational services of ecosystems. Ekonomia i Środowisko 2012, 42:167-175.
30. Łowicki D., Piotrowska S. Monetary valuation of road noise. Residential property prices as an indicator of the acoustic climate quality. Ecological Indicators 2015, 52:472-479. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.01.002.
31. Luttik J. The value of trees, water and open space as reflected by house prices in the Netherlands. Landscape and Urban Planning 2000, 48:161-167. 10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00039-6.
32. Lutzenhiser M., Netusil N.R. The effect of open spaces on a home's sale price. Contemporary Economic Policy 2001, 19:291-298. 10.1093/cep/19.3.291.
33. Lux M., Sunega P. Public housing in the post-socialist states of Central and Eastern Europe: Decline and an open future. Housing Studies 2014, 29:501-519. 10.1080/02673037.2013.875986.
34. Mansfield C., Pattanayak S.K., McDow W., McDonald R., Halpin P. Shades of Green: Measuring the value of urban forests in the housing market. Journal of Forest Economics 2005, 11:177-199. 10.1016/j.jfe.2005.08.002.
35. Marcińczak S., Sagan I. The socio-spatial restructuring of Łódź, Poland. Urban Stud 2011, 48:1789-1809. 10.1177/0042098010379276.
36. Melichar J., Kaprová K. Revealing preferences of Prague's homebuyers towards greenery amenities: The empirical evidence of distance-size effect. Landscape and Urban Planning 2013, 109:56-66. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.09.003.
37. More T.A., Stevens T., Allen P.G. Valuation of urban parks. Landscape and Urban Planning 1988, 15:139-152. 10.1016/0169-2046(88)90022-9.
38. Nicholls S., Crompton J.L. The impact of greenways on property values: Evidence from Austin, Texas. Journal of Leisure Research 2005, 37:321-341.
39. Sander H.A., Haight R.G. Estimating the economic value of cultural ecosystem services in an urbanizing area using hedonic pricing. Journal of Environmental Management 2012, 113:194-205. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.031.
40. Sander H.A., Polasky S. The value of views and open space: Estimates from a hedonic pricing model for Ramsey County, Minnesota, USA. Land Use Policy 2009, 26:837-845. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.10.009.
41. Sander H., Polasky S., Haight R.G. The value of urban tree cover: A hedonic property price model in Ramsey and Dakota Counties, Minnesota, USA. Ecological Economics 2010, 69:1646-1656. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.03.011.
42. Sillince J.A.A. Housing policies in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union 1990, Routledge, London and New York.
43. Smith V.K., Huang J.-C. Can markets value air quality? A meta-analysis of hedonic property value models. Journal of Political Economy 1995, 103:209-227.
44. Tratalos J., Fuller R.A., Warren P.H., Davies R.G., Gaston K.J. Urban form, biodiversity potential and ecosystem services. Landscape and Urban Planning 2007, 83:308-317. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.05.003.
45. Tsenkova S., Polanska D.V. Between state and market: Housing policy and housing transformation in post-socialist cities. GeoJournal 2014, 79:401-405. 10.1007/s10708-014-9538-x.
46. Tse R.Y.C., Love P.E.D. Measuring residential property values in Hong Kong. Property Management 2000, 18:366-374. 10.1108/02637470010360669.
47. Tyrväinen L. The amenity value of the urban forest: An application of the hedonic pricing method. Landscape and Urban Planning 1997, 37:211-222. 10.1016/S0169-2046(97)80005-9.
48. Tyrväinen L., Miettinen A. Property prices and urban forest amenities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2000, 39:205-223. 10.1006/jeem.1999.1097.
49. Zhang L. The use of panel data models in higher education policy studies. Higher education: Handbook of theory and research 2010, 307-349. Springer, Dordrecht. J.C. Smart (Ed.).