-
1
-
-
84869216607
-
A descriptive analysis of overviews of reviews published between 2000 and 2011
-
1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XhvVShsrrJ 23166744 3499476
-
Hartling L, et al. A descriptive analysis of overviews of reviews published between 2000 and 2011. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49667.
-
(2012)
PLoS One
, vol.7
, Issue.11
, pp. e49667
-
-
Hartling, L.1
-
2
-
-
84867861572
-
Overviews of reviews often have limited rigor: A systematic review
-
22959594
-
Pieper D, et al. Overviews of reviews often have limited rigor: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012;65(12):1267-73.
-
(2012)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.65
, Issue.12
, pp. 1267-1273
-
-
Pieper, D.1
-
3
-
-
0026094482
-
Validation of an index of the quality of review articles
-
1:STN:280:DyaK38%2FksVKktg%3D%3D 1834807
-
Oxman AD, Guyatt GH. Validation of an index of the quality of review articles. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44(11):1271-8.
-
(1991)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.44
, Issue.11
, pp. 1271-1278
-
-
Oxman, A.D.1
Guyatt, G.H.2
-
4
-
-
0026098758
-
Agreement among reviewers of review articles
-
1:STN:280:DyaK3M%2FptlOgsA%3D%3D 1824710
-
Oxman AD, et al. Agreement among reviewers of review articles. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44(1):91-8.
-
(1991)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.44
, Issue.1
, pp. 91-98
-
-
Oxman, A.D.1
-
5
-
-
0023124103
-
Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials
-
1:STN:280:DyaL2s7hsFKrtQ%3D%3D 3807986
-
Sacks HS, et al. Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. N Engl J Med. 1987;316(8):450-5.
-
(1987)
N Engl J Med
, vol.316
, Issue.8
, pp. 450-455
-
-
Sacks, H.S.1
-
6
-
-
84928294465
-
Systematic review found AMSTAR, but not R(evised)-AMSTAR, to have good measurement properties
-
25638457
-
Pieper D, et al. Systematic review found AMSTAR, but not R(evised)-AMSTAR, to have good measurement properties. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(5):574-83.
-
(2015)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.68
, Issue.5
, pp. 574-583
-
-
Pieper, D.1
-
7
-
-
84896316735
-
Methodological quality of meta-analyses on the blood pressure response to exercise: A review
-
1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXjs1GqsrY%3D 24463936
-
Johnson BT, et al. Methodological quality of meta-analyses on the blood pressure response to exercise: a review. J Hypertens. 2014;32(4):706-23.
-
(2014)
J Hypertens
, vol.32
, Issue.4
, pp. 706-723
-
-
Johnson, B.T.1
-
8
-
-
84959929923
-
Methodologic quality of meta-analyses and systematic reviews on the Mediterranean diet and cardiovascular disease outcomes: A review
-
1:CAS:528:DC%2BC28XnsFKhsrY%3D 26864357
-
Huedo-Medina TB, et al. Methodologic quality of meta-analyses and systematic reviews on the Mediterranean diet and cardiovascular disease outcomes: a review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016;103(3):841-50.
-
(2016)
Am J Clin Nutr
, vol.103
, Issue.3
, pp. 841-850
-
-
Huedo-Medina, T.B.1
-
9
-
-
79959952456
-
Effective training strategies for teaching communication skills to physicians: An overview of systematic reviews
-
20673620
-
Berkhof M, et al. Effective training strategies for teaching communication skills to physicians: an overview of systematic reviews. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;84(2):152-62.
-
(2011)
Patient Educ Couns
, vol.84
, Issue.2
, pp. 152-162
-
-
Berkhof, M.1
-
10
-
-
84896123141
-
Effects of exercise in the treatment of overweight and obese children and adolescents: A systematic review of meta-analyses
-
24455215 3886589
-
Kelley GA, Kelley KS. Effects of exercise in the treatment of overweight and obese children and adolescents: a systematic review of meta-analyses. J Obes. 2013;2013:783103.
-
(2013)
J Obes
, vol.2013
, pp. 783103
-
-
Kelley, G.A.1
Kelley, K.S.2
-
11
-
-
84874956592
-
Methodological quality and descriptive characteristics of prosthodontic-related systematic reviews
-
1:STN:280:DC%2BC3szgs1Sjuw%3D%3D 23330989
-
Aziz T, et al. Methodological quality and descriptive characteristics of prosthodontic-related systematic reviews. J Oral Rehabil. 2013;40(4):263-78.
-
(2013)
J Oral Rehabil
, vol.40
, Issue.4
, pp. 263-278
-
-
Aziz, T.1
-
12
-
-
84938912376
-
Critical appraisal of AMSTAR: Challenges, limitations, and potential solutions from the perspective of an assessor
-
26268372 4535290
-
Faggion Jr CM. Critical appraisal of AMSTAR: challenges, limitations, and potential solutions from the perspective of an assessor. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015;15:63.
-
(2015)
BMC Med Res Methodol
, vol.15
, pp. 63
-
-
Faggion, C.M.1
-
13
-
-
85007305553
-
Limitations of A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) and suggestions for improvement
-
27072548 4830078
-
Burda BU, Holmer HK, Norris SL. Limitations of A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) and suggestions for improvement. Syst Rev. 2016;5(1):58.
-
(2016)
Syst Rev
, vol.5
, Issue.1
, pp. 58
-
-
Burda, B.U.1
Holmer, H.K.2
Norris, S.L.3
-
14
-
-
84984616152
-
-
N.N. 2015 09.09.2015
-
N.N. 2015 09.09.2015]; Available from: http://www.amstar.ca/.
-
-
-
-
15
-
-
44349182040
-
External validation of a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews (AMSTAR)
-
18159233 2131785
-
Shea BJ, et al. External validation of a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews (AMSTAR). PLoS One. 2007;2(12):e1350.
-
(2007)
PLoS One
, vol.2
, Issue.12
, pp. e1350
-
-
Shea, B.J.1
-
16
-
-
33847606952
-
Development of AMSTAR: A measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews
-
17302989 1810543
-
Shea BJ, et al. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7:10.
-
(2007)
BMC Med Res Methodol
, vol.7
, pp. 10
-
-
Shea, B.J.1
-
17
-
-
84938792444
-
-
AMSTAR working group 2016 20.05.16
-
AMSTAR working group. AMSTAR Checklist. 2016 20.05.16]; Available from: www.amstar.ca.
-
AMSTAR Checklist
-
-
-
18
-
-
79151476340
-
Bias due to changes in specified outcomes during the systematic review process
-
Kirkham JJ, Altman DG, Williamson PR. Bias due to changes in specified outcomes during the systematic review process. PLoS One. 2010;5(3).
-
(2010)
PLoS One
, vol.5
, Issue.3
-
-
Kirkham, J.J.1
Altman, D.G.2
Williamson, P.R.3
-
19
-
-
84915803004
-
Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions
-
25271098
-
Page MJ, et al. Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;10:MR000035.
-
(2014)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
, vol.10
, pp. MR000035
-
-
Page, M.J.1
-
20
-
-
0037024219
-
Publishing protocols of systematic reviews: Comparing what was done to what was planned
-
12038926
-
Silagy CA, Middleton P, Hopewell S. Publishing protocols of systematic reviews: comparing what was done to what was planned. JAMA. 2002;287(21):2831-4.
-
(2002)
JAMA
, vol.287
, Issue.21
, pp. 2831-2834
-
-
Silagy, C.A.1
Middleton, P.2
Hopewell, S.3
-
21
-
-
79151471543
-
An international registry of systematic-review protocols
-
20630580
-
Booth A, et al. An international registry of systematic-review protocols. Lancet. 2011;377(9760):108-9.
-
(2011)
Lancet
, vol.377
, Issue.9760
, pp. 108-109
-
-
Booth, A.1
-
22
-
-
84920780781
-
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement
-
25554246 4320440
-
Moher D, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4:1.
-
(2015)
Syst Rev
, vol.4
, pp. 1
-
-
Moher, D.1
-
23
-
-
84876172734
-
Evidence summaries: The evolution of a rapid review approach
-
22587960 3351736
-
Khangura S, et al. Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach. Syst Rev. 2012;1(1):10.
-
(2012)
Syst Rev
, vol.1
, Issue.1
, pp. 10
-
-
Khangura, S.1
-
24
-
-
33744797104
-
Single data extraction generated more errors than double data extraction in systematic reviews
-
16765272
-
Buscemi N, et al. Single data extraction generated more errors than double data extraction in systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59(7):697-703.
-
(2006)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.59
, Issue.7
, pp. 697-703
-
-
Buscemi, N.1
-
25
-
-
84937919492
-
Automating data extraction in systematic reviews: A systematic review
-
26073888 4514954
-
Jonnalagadda SR, Goyal P, Huffman MD. Automating data extraction in systematic reviews: a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2015;4:78.
-
(2015)
Syst Rev
, vol.4
, pp. 78
-
-
Jonnalagadda, S.R.1
Goyal, P.2
Huffman, M.D.3
-
26
-
-
84860746569
-
The effect of English-language restriction on systematic review-based meta-analyses: A systematic review of empirical studies
-
22559755
-
Morrison A, et al. The effect of English-language restriction on systematic review-based meta-analyses: a systematic review of empirical studies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012;28(2):138-44.
-
(2012)
Int J Technol Assess Health Care
, vol.28
, Issue.2
, pp. 138-144
-
-
Morrison, A.1
-
27
-
-
22044442140
-
Language of publication restrictions in systematic reviews gave different results depending on whether the intervention was conventional or complementary
-
16086467
-
Pham B, et al. Language of publication restrictions in systematic reviews gave different results depending on whether the intervention was conventional or complementary. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58(8):769-76.
-
(2005)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.58
, Issue.8
, pp. 769-776
-
-
Pham, B.1
-
28
-
-
84957441680
-
Significant discrepancies were found in pooled estimates of searching with Chinese indexes versus searching with English indexes
-
26410113
-
Xue J, et al. Significant discrepancies were found in pooled estimates of searching with Chinese indexes versus searching with English indexes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;70:246-53.
-
(2015)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.70
, pp. 246-253
-
-
Xue, J.1
-
29
-
-
84890777770
-
-
Version 5.1.0, J.P.T.G. Higgins, S., Editor 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration
-
Higgins, JPTD, JJ. Chapter 7: Selecting studies and collecting data, in Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0, J.P.T.G. Higgins, S., Editor. 2011, The Cochrane Collaboration.
-
Chapter 7: Selecting Studies and Collecting Data, in Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
-
-
Higgins1
Jptd2
Jj3
-
30
-
-
84882846134
-
Testing the Newcastle Ottawa Scale showed low reliability between individual reviewers
-
23683848
-
Hartling L, et al. Testing the Newcastle Ottawa Scale showed low reliability between individual reviewers. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(9):982-93.
-
(2013)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.66
, Issue.9
, pp. 982-993
-
-
Hartling, L.1
-
31
-
-
77957661914
-
Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses
-
20652370
-
Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25(9):603-5.
-
(2010)
Eur J Epidemiol
, vol.25
, Issue.9
, pp. 603-605
-
-
Stang, A.1
-
33
-
-
84860792189
-
-
IOM: Finding What Works in Health Care Accessed 12 July 2016
-
IOM: Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews. 2011; Available from: http://www.nationalacademies.org/hmd/Reports/2011/Finding-What-Works-in-Health-Care-Standards-for-Systematic-Reviews/Standards.aspx. Accessed 12 July 2016.
-
(2011)
Standards for Systematic Reviews
-
-
-
35
-
-
79951952372
-
GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables
-
21195583
-
Guyatt G, et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):383-94.
-
(2011)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.64
, Issue.4
, pp. 383-394
-
-
Guyatt, G.1
-
37
-
-
16644377824
-
Qigong as a therapeutic intervention with older adults
-
15486154
-
Kemp CA. Qigong as a therapeutic intervention with older adults. J Holist Nurs. 2004;22(4):351-73.
-
(2004)
J Holist Nurs
, vol.22
, Issue.4
, pp. 351-373
-
-
Kemp, C.A.1
-
38
-
-
60049086438
-
Psychophysiological outcomes of health qigong for chronic conditions: A systematic review
-
19170945
-
Ng BH, Tsang HW. Psychophysiological outcomes of health qigong for chronic conditions: a systematic review. Psychophysiology. 2009;46(2):257-69.
-
(2009)
Psychophysiology
, vol.46
, Issue.2
, pp. 257-269
-
-
Ng, B.H.1
Tsang, H.W.2
-
39
-
-
84871262970
-
GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes
-
22542023
-
Guyatt G, et al. GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(2):151-7.
-
(2013)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.66
, Issue.2
, pp. 151-157
-
-
Guyatt, G.1
-
40
-
-
84863034391
-
GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence - Publication bias
-
21802904
-
Guyatt GH, et al. GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence - publication bias. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1277-82.
-
(2011)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.64
, Issue.12
, pp. 1277-1282
-
-
Guyatt, G.H.1
-
41
-
-
84890783342
-
Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta-Analyses
-
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
-
Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG. Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta-Analyses, in Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2008, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. p. 243-296
-
(2008)
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
, pp. 243-296
-
-
Deeks, J.J.1
Higgins, J.P.T.2
Altman, D.G.3
-
42
-
-
84942740537
-
When trial authors write Cochrane Reviews: Competing interests need to be better managed
-
25219979
-
Kliner M, Garner P. When trial authors write Cochrane Reviews: competing interests need to be better managed. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;9:ED000089.
-
(2014)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
, vol.9
, pp. ED000089
-
-
Kliner, M.1
Garner, P.2
-
43
-
-
69449100622
-
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
-
19622551 2714657
-
Moher D, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535.
-
(2009)
BMJ
, vol.339
, pp. b2535
-
-
Moher, D.1
-
44
-
-
69149107165
-
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
-
19622511 W64
-
Moher D, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264-9. W64.
-
(2009)
Ann Intern Med
, vol.151
, Issue.4
, pp. 264-269
-
-
Moher, D.1
|