Understanding engagement in science education: The psychological and the social

Second International Handbook of Science Education

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 19-33

  Olitsky, Stacy ^a,c   Milne, Catherine ^b  

^a Academy for Advanced and Creative Learning   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Math and Science Partnership of Greater Philadelphia   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84983539125     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_2     Document Type: Chapter

References (29)

1. Ainley, M., Hidi, S., & Berndorff, D. (2002). Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 545-561.
2. Alsop, S., & Watts, M. (2003). Science education and affect. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1043-1047.
3. Bybee, R. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Portsmouth, NH:Heinemann.
4. Collins, R. (2004). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5. Connell, J. P., Halpern-Felsher, B., Clifford, E., Crichlow, W., & Usinger, P. (1995). Hanging in there: Behavioral, psychological, and contextual factors affecting whether African American adolescents stay in school. Journal of Adolescent Research, 10, 41-63.
6. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper and Row.
7. Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing science knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23 (7), 5-12.
8. Duckworth, E. (1987). The having of wonderful ideas and other essays on teaching and learning. New York: Teachers College Press.
9. Durkheim, E. (1965). The elementary forms of religious life. New York: Free Press. (Originally published in 1912)
10. Elmesky, R. (2001). Struggles of agency and structure as cultural worlds collide as urban African American youth learn physics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.
11. Elmesky, R., & Seiler, G. (2007). Movement expressiveness, solidarity and the (re)shaping of African American students' scientific identities. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2, 73-103.
12. Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 399-483.
13. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59-109.
14. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
15. Herrenkohl, L. R., & Guerra, M. R. (1998). Participant structures, scientific discourse, and student engagement in fourth grade. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 431-473.
16. Hickey, D. T., & Zuiker, S. J. (2005). Engaged participation: A sociocultural model of motivation with implications for educational assessment. Educational Assessment, 10, 277-305.
17. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge:University of Cambridge Press.
18. Milne, C., & Otieno, T. (2007). Understanding engagement: Science demonstrations and emotional energy. Science Education, 91, 523-553.
19. Milne, C., & Ma, J. (2008). Making sense of the regents chemistry exam. In P. Fraser-Abder (Ed.), Pedagogical issues in science, mathematics and technology education (Vol. 3). Schenectady, NY: New York Consortium for Professional Development.
20. National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
21. Olitsky, S. (2005). Social and cultural capital in science teaching: Relating practice and reflection. In K. Tobin, R. Elmesky, & G. Seiler (Eds.), Improving urban science education: new roles for teachers, students and researchers (pp. 315-336). New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
22. Olitsky, S. (2007). Promoting student engagement in science: Interaction rituals and the pursuit of a community of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 33-56.
23. Palincsar, A. S., Anderson, C. W., & David, Y. (1993). Pursuing scientific literacy in the middle grades through collaborative problem solving. Elementary School Journal, 5, 643-658.
24. Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 6, 167-199.
25. Seiler, G. (2002). A critical look at teaching, learning, and learning to teach science in an inner city, neighborhood high school. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
26. Tobin, K. (2005). Urban science as culturally and socially adaptive practice. In K. Tobin, R. Elmesky, & G. Seiler (Eds.), Improving urban science education: new roles for teachers, students and researchers (pp. 45-67). New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
27. Tobin, K., & Capie, W. (1982). Relationships between formal reasoning ability, locus of control, academic engagement and integrated process skill achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19, 113-121.
28. Uekawa, K., Borman, K., & Lee, R. (2007). Student engagement in U.S. urban high school mathematics and science classrooms: Findings on social organization, race, and ethnicity. The Urban Review, 39, 1-43.
29. Watts, M., & Alsop, S. (1997). A feeling for learning: Modelling affective learning in school science. Curriculum Journal, 8, 351-365.