Organizational responses to uncertainty in the airline industry: Changes in patterns of communication networks

Journal of Air Transport Management

Volumn 57, Issue , 2016, Pages 217-227

  Rubinstein, Saul ^a   Martin Rios, Carlos ^b   Erhardt, Niclas ^c   Hoffer Gittell, Jody ^d   George, Varghese P ^e  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES WESTERN SWITZERLAND   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MAINE   (United States)

^d BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Cross functional boundary spanners; High reliability organizations; Problem solving; Relational coordination; Resilience; Social network analysis; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

AIRLINE INDUSTRY; COMMUNICATION NETWORK; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; NETWORK ANALYSIS; SOCIAL NETWORK; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

NEW JERSEY; NEWARK; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84983517783     PISSN: 09696997     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2016.07.021     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Adler, P.S., Kwon, S.W., Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Acad. Manag. Rev. 27:1 (2002), 17–40.
2. Alam, M.A., Techno-stress and productivity: survey evidence from the aviation industry. J. Air. Transp. Manag. 50 (2016), 62–70.
3. Argote, L., Turner, M., Fichman, M., To centralize or not to centralize: the effects of uncertainty and threat on group structure and performance. Org. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process 43 (1989), 58–74.
4. Bamber, G.J., Gittell, J.H., Kochan, T.A., Von Nordenflycht, A., Up in the Air: How Airlines Can Improve Performance by Engaging Their Employees. 2009, Cornell University Press, New York.
5. Bigley, G., Roberts, K.H., The icommand system: high-reliability organizing for complex and volatile task environments. Acad. Manag. J. 44 (2001), 1281–1299.
6. Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G., Freeman, L.C., Analytic technologies. UCINET 6 for Windows, 2002, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
7. Bruce, P.J., Understanding Decision-making Processes in Airline Operations Control. 2016, Routledge, New York.
8. Bunderson, J.S., Sutcliffe, K., Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: process and performance effects. Acad. Manag. J. 45 (2002), 875–893.
9. Burns, T., Stalker, G.M., The Management of Innovation. 1961, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
10. Burt, R.S., Structural holes and good ideas. Am. J. Sociol. 110:2 (2004), 349–399.
11. Daft, R.L., Lengel, R.H., Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Manag. Sci. 32:5 (1986), 554–571.
12. Driskell, J.E., Salas, E., Group decision making under stress. J. Appl. Psychol., 76(3), 1991, 473.
13. Erhardt, N., Martin-Rios, C., Harkins, J., Knowledge flow from the top: the importance of teamwork structure in team sports. Eur. Sport Manag. Q. 14:4 (2014), 375–396.
14. Erhardt, N., Martin-Rios, C., Way, S., From bureaucratic forms towards team-based knowledge work systems: implications for human resource management. Int. J. Collab. Enterp. 1:2 (2009), 160–179.
15. Everett, M.G., Borgatti, S.P., Categorical attribute based centrality: E–I and G–F centrality. Soc. Netw. 34 (2012), 562–569.
16. Flint, P., Newark isn't just Newark anymore. Air Transp. World 38 (2001), 58–64.
17. Franke, M., John, F., What comes next after recession?–Airline industry scenarios and potential end games. J. Air. Transp. Manag. 17:1 (2011), 19–26.
18. Freeman, L., Centrality in social networks: conceptual clarification. Soc. Netw. 1 (1979), 215–239.
19. Galbraith, J., Organization design: an information processing view. Lorsch, J.W., Lawrence, P.R., (eds.) Organization Planning: Cases and Concepts, 1972, Richard D. Irwin, Inc, Homewood, 49–74.
20. George, V.P., Allen, T.J., Relational data in organizational settings: an introductory note for using Agni and Netgraphs to analyze nodes, relationships, partitions and boundaries. Connect 16:1&2 (1993), 48–60.
21. Giles, C.N., Modern airline pilots' quandary: standard Operating Procedures—to comply or not to comply. J. Aviat. Technol. Eng. 2:2 (2013), 2–12.
22. Gittell, J.H., Supervisory span, relational coordination and flight departure performance: a reassessment of post-bureaucracy theory. Organ. Sci. 12:4 (2001), 467–482.
23. Gittell, J.H., Coordinating mechanisms in care provider groups: relational coordination as a mediator and input uncertainty as a moderator of performance effects. Manag. Sci. 48 (2002), 1408–1426.
24. Gittell, J.H., The Southwest Airlines Way: Using the Power of Relationships to Achieve High Performance. 2005, McGraw-Hill, New York.
25. Gittell, J.H., Transforming Relationships for High Performance. 2016, Stanford University Press, Palo Alto.
26. Gittell, J.H., Weinberg, D., Pfefferle, S., Bishop, C., Impact of relational coordination on job satisfaction and quality outcomes: a study of nursing homes. Hum. Resour. Manag. J. 18:2 (2008), 154–170.
27. Gittell, J.H., Seidner, R., Wimbush, J., A relational model of how high-performance work systems work. Organ. Sci. 21:2 (2010), 490–506.
28. Gittell, J.H., Douglass, A., Relational bureaucracy: structuring reciprocal relationships into roles. Acad. Manag. Rev. 37:4 (2012), 709–754.
29. Gittell, J.H., Weiss, L., Coordination networks within and across organizations: a multi-level Framework. J Manag. Stud. 41:1 (2004), 127–153.
30. Gladstein, D.L., Reilly, N.P., Group decision making under threat: the tycoon game. Acad. Manag. J. 28:3 (1985), 613–627.
31. Granovetter, M., The strength of weak ties. Am. J. Sociol. 6:6 (1973), 1360–1380.
32. Igbo, K.E., Higgins, P.G., Dunstall, S., Bruce, P.J., Regulating interactions across multiple centres of control: an airline operations control perspective. Fifth International Symposium on Resilience Engineering, Soesterberg, The Netherlands, 2013.
33. Johnson, J.D., Managing Knowledge Networks. 2010, Cambridge University Press, New York.
34. Kelly, J.R., McGrath, J.E., Effects of time limits and task types on task performance and interaction of four-person groups. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol., 49(2), 1985, 395.
35. Krackhardt, D., Constraints on the interactive organization as an ideal type. Heckscher, C., Donnellon, A., (eds.) The Post Bureaucratic Organization, 1994, Sage, Thousand Oaks, 211–222.
36. Krackhardt, D., Stern, R.N., Informal networks and organizational crisis: an experimental simulation. Soc. Psychol. Q. 51:2 (1988), 123–140.
37. Leveson, N., Dulac, N., Marais, K., Carroll, J., Moving beyond normal accidents and high reliability organizations: a systems approach to safety in complex systems. Organ. Stud. 30:2 (2009), 227–249.
38. Manev, I.M., Stevenson, W.B., Balancing ties: boundary spanning and influence in the organization's extended network of communication. Int. J. Bus. Commun. 38:2 (2001), 183–205.
39. Magalhães, L., Reis, V., Macário, R., Can flexibility make the difference to an airport's productivity? an assessment using cluster analysis. J. Air. Transp. Manag. 47 (2015), 90–101.
40. Marrone, J.A., Team boundary spanning: a multilevel review of past research and proposals for the future. J. Manag. 36:4 (2010), 911–940.
41. Martin-Rios, C., Why do firms seek to share human resource management knowledge? the importance of inter-firm networks. J. Bus. Res. 67:2 (2014), 190–199.
42. O'leary, M.B., Mortensen, M., Woolley, A.W., Multiple team membership: a theoretical model of its effects on productivity and learning for individuals and teams. Acad. Manag. Revi 36:3 (2011), 461–478.
43. Perrone, V., Zaheer, A., McEvily, B., Free to be trusted? Organizational constraints on trust in boundary spanners. Organ. Sci. 4:4 (2003), 422–439.
44. Roberts, K.H., Some characteristics of one type of high reliability organization. Organ. Sci. 1 (1990), 160–177.
45. Rubinstein, S., The impact of co-management on quality performance: the case of the Saturn Corporation. Ind. Labor Relat. Rev. 53:2 (2000), 197–218.
46. Rubinstein, S., Kochan, T., Learning from Saturn: Possibilities for Corporate Governance and Employee Relations. 2001, Cornell University Press, New York.
47. Scott, J., Social Network Analysis: a Handbook. 1991, Sage, Thousand Oaks.
48. Scott, R., Institutions and Organizations. second ed., 2001, Sage, Thousand Oaks.
49. Siomkos, G.J., Managing airline disasters: the role of consumer safety perceptions and sense-making. J. Air. Transp. Manag. 6:2 (2000), 101–108.
50. Staw, B., Sandelands, L., Dutton, J., Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: a multi-level analysis. Adm. Sci. Q. 26 (1981), 501–524.
51. Sutcliffe, K., Vogus, T., Organizing for resilience. Cameron, K., Dutton, J., Quinn, R., (eds.) Positive Organizational Scholarship: Foundations of a New Discipline, 2003, Berrett-Koehler, San Fransisco, 94–110.
52. Vogus, T., Sutcliffe, K., Weick, K., Doing no harm: enabling, enacting, and elaborating a culture of safety in health care. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 24 (2010), 60–77.
53. Wasserman, S., Faust, K., Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. 1994, Cambridge University Press, New York.
54. Weick, K., Roberts, K., Collective mind in organizations: heedful interrelating on flight decks. Adm. Sci. Q. 38 (1993), 357–381.
55. Weick, K., Sutcliffe, K., Managing the Unexpected: Assuring High Performance in an Age of Complexity. 2001, Jossey-Bass, San Fransisco.
56. Weick, K., Sutcliffe, K., Obstfeld, D., Organizing for high reliability: processes of collective mindfulness. Sutton, R., Staw, B.M., (eds.) Research in Organizational Behavior, 1999, 21. JAI Press, Greenwich, 81–124.
57. Wildavsky, A., Searching for Safety. 1988, Transaction Books, New Brunswick.