Frequency and reasons for extra sequences in clinical abdominal MRI examinations

Abdominal Radiology

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 306-311

  Schreiber Zinaman, Jessica ^a   Rosenkrantz, Andrew B ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Abdominal imaging; Motion; MRCP; MRI; Workflow

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL RADIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; LIVER; MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGIST; RADIOLOGIST; WORKFLOW; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; LIVER DISEASE; MALE; PROCEDURES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; UTILIZATION;

ARTIFACTS; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, MAGNETIC RESONANCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LIVER DISEASES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 84983490071     PISSN: 2366004X     EISSN: 23660058     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00261-016-0877-6     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Roth CJ, Boll DT, Chea YW, Wall LK, Merkle EM (2009) Implementation of graphic user interface screen capture solution for workflow assessment of abdominal MR examinations valuable tool to analyze discrepancies in expected and experienced MR table time. Acad Radiol 16(10):1286–1291. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2009.05.009
2. Brennan SC, Redd WH, Jacobsen PB, et al. (1988) Anxiety and panic during magnetic resonance scans. Lancet 2(8609):512
3. Andre JB, Bresnahan BW, Mossa-Basha M, et al. (2015) Toward quantifying the prevalence, severity, and cost associated with patient motion during clinical mr examinations. J Am Coll Radiol 12(7):689–695. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2015.03.007
4. Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Value-Based Payment Modifier. https://www.cms.gov/medicare/medicare-fee-for-service-payment/physicianfeedbackprogram/valuebasedpaymentmodifier.html. Accessed 6 Feb 2016
5. American College of Radiology CMS Finalized CT and MR Cost Center Policy in IPPS Final Rule. http://www.acr.org/News-Publications/News/News-Articles/2013/Economics/20130805-CT-and-MR-Cost-Center-Policy. Accessed 6 Feb 2016
6. Boland GW, Duszak R Jr, McGinty G, Allen B Jr (2014) Delivery of appropriateness, quality, safety, efficiency and patient satisfaction. J Am Coll Radiol 11(1):7–11. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2013.07.016
7. Gazelle GS, Johnson CD, Kruskal JB. Radiologic Society of North America. Reducing Unnecessary Scan Acquisitions at Abdominal MRI. https://www.rsna.org/uploadedFiles/RSNA/Content/Science_and_Education/Quality/Reducing%20Unnecessary%20Scan%20Acquisitons%20at%20Abdominal%20MRI%20Application.pdf. Accessed 6 Feb 2016
8. Roth CJ, Boll DT, Wall LK, Merkle EM (2010) Evaluation of MRI acquisition workflow with lean six sigma method: case study of liver and knee examinations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195(2):W150–W156. doi:10.2214/AJR.09.3678
9. Ehman RL, McNamara MT, Pallack M, Hricak H, Higgins CB (1984) Magnetic resonance imaging with respiratory gating: techniques and advantages. AJR Am J Roentgenol 143(6):1175–1182. doi:10.2214/ajr.143.6.1175
10. Ivancevic MK, Kwee TC, Takahara T, et al. (2009) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the liver at 3.0 Tesla using TRacking Only Navigator echo (TRON): a feasibility study. J Magn Reson Imaging 30(5):1027–1033. doi:10.1002/jmri.21939
11. McConnell MV, Khasgiwala VC, Savord BJ, et al. (1997) Comparison of respiratory suppression methods and navigator locations for MR coronary angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168(5):1369–1375. doi:10.2214/ajr.168.5.9129447
12. Taouli B, Sandberg A, Stemmer A, et al. (2009) Diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver: comparison of navigator triggered and breathhold acquisitions. J Magn Reson Imaging 30(3):561–568. doi:10.1002/jmri.21876
13. Klaming L, van Minde D, Weda H, Nielsen T, Duijm LE (2015) The relation between anticipatory anxiety and movement during an mr examination. Acad Radiol 22(12):1571–1578. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2015.08.020
14. Powell R, Ahmad M, Gilbert FJ, Brian D, Johnston M (2015) Improving magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations: development and evaluation of an intervention to reduce movement in scanners and facilitate scan completion. Br J Health Psychol 20(3):449–465. doi:10.1111/bjhp.12132
15. Kaplan DA (2014) Diagnostic Imaging. Making Imaging Centers Child Friendly http://www.diagnosticimaging.com/pediatric-imaging/making-imaging-centers-child-friendly. Accessed 6 Feb 2016
16. Chandarana H, Feng L, Ream J, et al. (2015) Respiratory motion-resolved compressed sensing reconstruction of free-breathing radial acquisition for dynamic liver magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 50(11):749–756. doi:10.1097/RLI.0000000000000179
17. Kang KA, Kim YK, Kim E, et al. (2015) T2-Weighted liver MRI using the multivane technique at 3T: comparison with conventional T2-Weighted MRI. Korean J Radiol 16(5):1038–1046. doi:10.3348/kjr.2015.16.5.1038
18. Zhang L, Tian C, Wang P, et al. (2015) Comparative study of image quality between axial T2-weighted BLADE and turbo spin-echo MRI of the upper abdomen on 3.0 T. Japanese J Radiol 33(9):585–590. doi:10.1007/s11604-015-0463-9
19. Rosenkrantz AB, Patel JM, Babb JS, Storey P, Hecht EM (2010) Liver MRI at 3 T using a respiratory-triggered time-efficient 3D T2-weighted technique: impact on artifacts and image quality. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194(3):634–641. doi:10.2214/AJR.09.2994
20. Dohan A, Gavini JP, Place V, et al. (2013) T2-weighted MR imaging of the liver: qualitative and quantitative comparison of SPACE MR imaging with turbo spin-echo MR imaging. European J Radiol 82(11):e655–e661. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.07.020
21. Rosenkrantz AB, Mannelli L, Mossa D, Babb JS (2011) Breath-hold T2-weighted MRI of the liver at 3T using the BLADE technique: impact upon image quality and lesion detection. Clin Radiol 66(5):426–433. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2010.10.018
22. Bayramoglu S, Kilickesmez O, Cimilli T, et al. (2010) T2-weighted MRI of the upper abdomen: comparison of four fat-suppressed T2-weighted sequences including PROPELLER (BLADE) technique. Acad Radiol 17(3):368–374. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2009.10.015
23. Davenport MS, Khalatbari S, Michigan Radiology Quality C, Platt JF (2015) Human- versus system-level factors and their effect on electronic work list variation: challenging radiology’s fundamental attribution error. J Am Coll Radiol 12(9):931–939. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2015.03.035
24. Sharma A (2014) A case for changing the way we utilize MR imaging: a societal perspective. J Am Coll Radiol 11(10):931–932. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2013.12.014