Measuring student response to instructional practices (StRIP) in traditional and active classrooms

ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings

Volumn 2016-June, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Nguyen, Kevin A ^a   Borrego, Maura J ^a   Finelli, Cynthia ^b   Shekhar, Prateek ^a   DeMonbrun, Robert Matthew ^b   Henderson, Charles ^c   Prince, Michael J ^d   Waters, Cindy ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d BUCKNELL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e NORTH CAROLINA A AND T STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84983353042     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21535965     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Freeman, S., and Eddy., S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415.
2. Finelli, C. J., and Richardson., K. M., & Daly, S. R. (2013). Factors that influence faculty motivation to adopt effective teaching practices in engineering. Paper presented at the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA.
3. Froyd, J. E., Borrego, M., Cutler, S., Henderson, C., & Prince, M. (2013). Estimates of use of research-based instructional strategies in core electrical or computer engineering courses. IEEE Transactions on Education, 56(4), 393-399.
4. Henderson, C., & Dancy, M. H. (2007). Barriers to the Use of Research-Based Instructional Strategies: The Influence of Both Individual and Situational Characteristics. Physical Review Special Topics: Physics Education Research, 3(2), 020102-020101 to 020102-020114.
5. Bacon, D. R., and Stewart., K. A., & Silver, W. S. (1999). Lessons from the best and worst student team experiences: How a teacher can make the difference. Journal of Management Education, 23(5), 467-488.
6. Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2009). Active learning: An introduction. ASQ Higher Education Brief, 2(4), 1-5.
7. Goodwin, L., and Miller., J. E., & Cheetham, R. D. (1991). Teaching freshmen to think: does active learning work? BioScience, 719-722.
8. Hall, S. R., Waitz, I., Brodeu, D. R., and Soderholm., D. H., & Nasr, R. (2002). Adoption of active learning in a lecture-based engineering class. Paper presented at the Frontiers in Education, 2002. FIE 2002. 32nd Annual.
9. Kvam, P. H. (2000). The effect of active learning methods on student retention in engineering statistics. The American Statistician, 54(2), 136-140.
10. Rangachari, P. (1991). Design of a problem-based undergraduate course in pharmacology: implications for the teaching of physiology. The American journal of physiology, 260(6 Pt 3), S14-21.
11. Wilke, R. R. (2003). The effect of active learning on student characteristics in a human physiology course for nonmajors. Advances in physiology education, 27(4), 207-223.
12. Dancy, M. H., Henderson, C., Rebello, N. S., and Engelhardt., P. V., & Singh, C. (2012). Experiences of new faculty implementing research-based instructional strategies. Paper presented at the AIP Conference Proceedings-American Institute of Physics.
13. Dancy, M. H., Henderson, C., & Turpen, C. (accepted). How faculty learn about and implement research based instructional strategies: The case of Peer Instruction.
14. Finelli, C. J., Richardson, K., & Daly, S. (2013). Factors that Influence Faculty Motivation of Effective Teaching Practices in Engineering. Paper presented at the Annual Conference-American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE).
15. Froyd, J. E., Borrego, M., Cutler, S., Henderson, C., & Prince, M. (2013). Estimates of use of research-based instructional strategies in core electrical or computer engineering courses. IEEE Transactions on Education, 56(4), 393-399.
16. Henderson, C., & Dancy, M. H. (2007). Barriers to the use of research-based instructional strategies: The influence of both individual and situational characteristics. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 3(2), 020102.
17. Prince, M., Borrego, M., Henderson, C., Cutler, S., & Froyd, J. (2013). Use of research-based instructional strategies in core chemical engineering courses. Chemical Engineering Education, 47(1), 27-37.
18. Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION-WASHINGTON-, 93, 223-232.
19. Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION-WASHINGTON-, 95(2), 123.
20. Felder, R. M. (1992). How about a quick one? Chemical Engineering Education, 26(1), 18-19.
21. Felder, R. M. (1994). Any questions? Chemical Engineering Education, 28(3), 174-175.
22. Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (1999). FAQs-2. Chemical Engineering Education, 33(4), 276-277.
23. Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2009). Active Learning: An Introduction. ASQ Higher Education Brief, 2(4). Retrieved from
24. Weimer, M. (2002). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice: John Wiley & Sons.
25. Lake, D. (2001). Student performance and perceptions of a lecture-based course compared with the same course utilizing group discussion. Physical Therapy, 81, 896-902.
26. Yadav, A., Lundeberg, M., Subedi, S., & Bunting, C. (2011). Problem-based learning in an undergraduate electrical engineering course. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(2), 253-280.
27. Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American journal of Physics, 66(1), 64-74.
28. Handelsman, J., Ebert-May, D., Beichner, R., Bruns, P., Chang, A., DeHaan, R.,⋯ Tilghman, S. M. (2004). Scientific teaching. Science, 304(5670), 521-522.
29. Meltzer, D. E., & Thornton, R. K. (2012). Resource letter ALIP-1: active-learning instruction in physics. American journal of Physics, 80(6), 478-496.
30. Gaffney, J. D., Gaffney, A. L. H., & Beichner, R. J. (2010). Do they see it coming? Using expectancy violation to gauge the success of pedagogical reforms. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 6(1), 010102.
31. Shekhar, P., Demonbrun, M., Borrego, M., Finelli, C., Prince, M., Henderson, C., & Waters, C. (2015). Development of an observation protocol to study undergraduate engineering student resistance to active learning. International Journal of Engineering Education, 31(2), 597-609.