Virtual team working and associated technologies within the UK construction industry

Architectural Engineering and Design Management

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 21-32

  Moore, D R ^a   Abadi, M ^b  

^a ROBERT GORDON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Construction innovation; Consultants; Information communication technologies; Sector use variability; Virtual teams

Indexed keywords

EID: 84983034542     PISSN: 17452007     EISSN: 17527589     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17452007.2005.9684581     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Ahuja, M K, and Carley, K M. 1998. ‘Network structure in virtual organization’. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 3 (4):1–31. [Online]http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue4/ahuja.html
2. Allen, T, and Morton, M S. 1994. Information Technology and the Corporation of the 1990s New York:Oxford University Press. (cited in 3, record 56)
3. Baines, A. 1998. ‘Using information technology to facilitate organizational change’. Work Study, 47 (2):49–52.
4. Bell, J. 1996. Doing Your Research Project:A Guide for First Time Researchers in Education and Social Science Bristol:Open University Press. (cited in Naoum,1998, p89)
5. CBPP. 2003. ‘About the Construction Best Practice Programme’ http://www.cbpp.org.uk/cbpp/
6. Economic Development Committee. 1964. The Placing and Management of Contracts for Building and Civil Engineering Works, The Banwell Report London:HMSO.
7. Economic Development Committee. 1967. Action on the Banwell Report London:HMSO.
8. Economic Development Committee. 1968. Contracting in Civil Engineering Since Banwell London:HMSO.
9. Egan, J. 1998. Rethinking Construction London:HMSO.
10. Fellows, R, and Liu, A. 1999. Research Methods for Construction Oxford:Blackwell Science.
11. Gattorna, J L, and Walters, D W. 1996. Managing The Supply Chain. A Strategic Perspective London:Macmillan Business.
12. George, J A. 1996. “ ‘Virtual best practice’ ”. In Teams Magazine 38–45. November
13. Hills, Electrical. 2001. ‘Latham and Egan fail to change attitudes of main contractors’ http://www.hillelec.plc.uk/press/jul2.asp
14. Jarvenpaa, S L, and Leidner, D E. 1998. ‘Communication and trust in global virtual teams’. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 3 (4):1–38. [Online]http://hyperion.math.upatras.gr/commorg/jarvenpaa/
15. Johnson, R E, and Clayton, M J. 1998. ‘The impact of information technology in design and construction’. Automation in Construction, 8:3–14.
16. Kalpakjian, S, and Schmid, S R. 2001. Manufacturing Engineering and Technology, 4th edn New Jersey:Prentice-Hall Inc.
17. Latham, M. 1994. Constructing The Team London:HMSO.
18. Levin, R I, and Robin, D S. 1990. Statistics for Management, 5th edn New Jersey:Prentice-Hall Inc.
19. Lipnack, J, and Stamps, J. 1997. Virtual Teams:Reaching Across Space, Time and Organizations with Technology New York:John Wiley and Sons.
20. Lurey, J S, and Raisinghani, M S. 2001. ‘An empirical study of best practices in virtual teams’. Information and Management, 38:523–544.
21. McKenna, E. 2000. Business Psychology and Organizational Behaviour:A Student's Handbook, 3rd edn Hove, Psychology Press Ltd
22. Moore, D R. 1996. “ ‘The Renaissance:the beginning of the end for implicit buildability’ ”. In Building Research Information Vol. 24, 259–269. London:E & FN Spon. 5
23. Moore, D R, I-Cheng, M, and Dainty, A RJ. 2002. “ ‘Competence, competency and competencies:performance assessment in organizations’ ”. In Work Study Vol. 51, 314–319. Bradford:MCB University Press. in(6):, November2002, ISSN0043–8022
24. Naoum, S G. 1998. Dissertation Research and Writing for Construction Students Oxford:Butterworth-Heinemann.
25. Raghuram, S, Raghu, G, Wiesenfeld, B, and Gupta, V. 2001. ‘Factors contributing to virtual work adjustment’. Journal of Management, 27:383–405.
26. Saunders, M, Lewis, P, and Thornhill, A. 1997. Research Methods for Business Students London:Financial Times Management.
27. Townsend, A M, DeMarie, S M, and Hendrickson, A R. 1998. ‘Virtual teams:technology and the workplace of the future’. The Academy of Management Executive, 12 (3):17–29.