Phylo.io: Interactive Viewing and Comparison of Large Phylogenetic Trees on the Web

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 33, Issue 8, 2016, Pages 2163-2166

  Robinson, Oscar ^a   Dylus, David ^a,b   Dessimoz, Christophe ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^c SWISS INSTITUTE OF BIOINFORMATICS   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

molecular evolution; Phylogenetics; visualization; web services

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; LICENCE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; PLANT LEAF; ROOTING; BIOLOGY; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; EVOLUTION; INTERNET; PHYLOGENY; PROCEDURES; SOFTWARE;

BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; INTERNET; PHYLOGENY; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84982969113     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msw080     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Altenhoff AM, Skunca N, Glover N, Train C-M, Sueki A, Pilizota I, Gori K, Tomiczek B, Müller S, Redestig H, et al. 2015. The OMA orthology database in 2015: function predictions, better plant support, synteny view and other improvements. Nucleic Acids Res. 43:D240-D249.
2. Bostock M, Ogievetsky V, Heer J. 2011. D3: data-driven documents. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 17:2301-2309.
3. Bouckaert RR. 2010. DensiTree: making sense of sets of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 26:1372-1373.
4. Bremm S, Von Landesberger T, Hess M, Schreck T, Weil P, Hamacherk K. 2011. Interactive visual comparison of multiple trees. VAST 2011. Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology 2011, pp. 31-40.
5. Gomez JAG, Plaisant C, Shneiderman B, Buck-Coleman A. 2012. Interactive visualizations for comparing two trees with structure and node value changes. HCIL Tech Report, pp. 1-11.
6. Guindon S, Dufayard J-F, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, Gascuel O. 2010. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3. 0. Syst Biol. 59:307-321.
7. Harrower M, Brewer CA. 2003. ColorBrewer. org: an online tool for selecting colour schemes for maps. Cartogr J. 40:27-37.
8. Huson DH, Bryant D. 2006. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol Biol Evol. 23:254-267.
9. Katoh K, Standley DM. 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 30(4):772-780.
10. Kuraku S, Zmasek CM, Nishimura O, Katoh K. 2013. aLeaves facilitates on-demand exploration of metazoan gene family trees on MAFFT sequence alignment server with enhanced interactivity. Nucleic Acids Res. 41:W22-W28.
11. Munzner T, Guimbretière F, Tasiran S, Zhang L, Zhou Y. 2003. TreeJuxtaposer. ACM SIGGRAPH 2003 Papers on SIGGRAPH'03:453.
12. Nye TMW, Lio P, GilksWR. 2006. A novel algorithm and web-based tool for comparing two alternative phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 22:117-119.
13. Rambaut A. 2009. FigTree. Available from: http://tree. bio. ed. ac. uk/soft ware/figtree/.
14. Scornavacca C, Zickmann F, Huson DH. 2011. Tanglegrams for rooted phylogenetic trees and networks. Bioinformatics 27:i248-i256.
15. Smits SA, Ouverney CC. 2010. jsPhyloSVG: a Java Script library for visualizing interactive and vector-based phylogenetic trees on the web. PLoS One 5:6-9.
16. Stamatakis A. 2014. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30:1312-1313.
17. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. 2013. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6. 0. Mol Biol Evol. 30:2725-2729.
18. von Landesberger T, Kuijper A, Schreck T, Kohlhammer J, van Wijk JJ, Fekete JD, Fellner DW. 2011. Visual analysis of large graphs: state-ofthe-art and future research challenges. Comput Graph Forum 30:1719-1749.
19. Zhang H, Gao S, Lercher MJ, Hu S, Chen WH. 2012. EvolView, an online tool for visualizing, annotating and managing phylogenetic trees. Nucleic Acids Res. 40:569-572.