Single center validation of routine blastocyst biopsy implementation

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

Volumn 33, Issue 11, 2016, Pages 1507-1513

  Whitney, John B ^a   Schiewe, Mitchel C ^a   Anderson, Robert E ^a,b  

^a Ovation Fertility   (United States)

^b Southern California Reproductive Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Biopsy; Blastocyst; PGS; Trophectoderm; Validation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOPSY TECHNIQUE; BIRTH RATE; BLASTOCYST BIOPSY; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; EMBRYO; EMBRYO CULTURE; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IN VITRO FERTILIZATION; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; LIVE BIRTH; NIDATION; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC DIAGNOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ULTRASOUND; VALIDATION STUDY; VITRIFICATION; BIOPSY; BLASTOCYST; CRYOPRESERVATION; CYTOLOGY; GENETICS; PREGNANCY RATE;

ADULT; BIOPSY; BLASTOCYST; CRYOPRESERVATION; EMBRYO IMPLANTATION; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIVE BIRTH; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; PREIMPLANTATION DIAGNOSIS; VITRIFICATION;

EID: 84982306195     PISSN: 10580468     EISSN: 15737330     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-016-0792-3     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Heijnen EMEW, Macklon NS, Fauser BCJM. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? The next step to improving outcomes of IVF: consider the whole treatment. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:1936–8.
2. Gnoth C, Maxrath B, Skonieczny T, et al. Final ART success rates: a 10 years survey. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:2239–46.
3. Stolwijk AM, Wetzels AMM, Braat DDM. Cumulative probability of achieving an ongoing pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection according to a woman’s age, subfertility diagnosis and primary or secondary subfertility. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:203–9.
4. Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB, Wagley L, Schlenker T, Stevens J, Hesla J. A prospective randomized trial of blastocyst culture and transfer in in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:34–40.
5. Rubio I, Galan A, Larreategui Z, et al. Clinical validation of embryo culture and section by morphokinetic analysis: a randomized, controlled trial of the embryo scope. Fertil Steril. 2014;102:1287–94.
6. Liu J, Sills E, Yang Z, Salem S, et al. Array comparative genomic hybridization screening in IVF significantly reduces number of embryos available for cryopreservation. Clinical Exp Reprod Med. 2014;39:52–7.
7. Kramer YG, Kfinas JD, Melzer K, et al. Assessing morphokinetic parameters via time lapse microscopy (TLM) to predict euploidy: are aneuploidy risk classification models universal? J Asst Reprod Genet. 2014;31:1231–42.
8. Schiewe MC. Microsecure vitrification (μS-VTF) procedure: optimum simplicity, security, cost-saving and effectiveness combining FDA-approved products. J Clin Embryol. 2010;13:33–41.
9. Schiewe MC, Zozula S, Anderson RE, Fahy GM. Validation of microSecure vitrification (mS-VTF) for the effective cryopreservation of human embryos and oocytes. Cryobiol. 2015;71:264–72.
10. Whitney JB, Anderson RE, Nugent NL, Schiewe MC. Euploidy predictability of human blastocyst inner cell mass and trophectoderm grading. Annals Clin Lab Res. 2015;3:4–7.
11. Gardner DK. Changes in requirements and utilization of nutrients during mammalian preimplantation and embryo development and their significance in embryo culture. Theriogenology. 1998;49:83–102.
12. Scott Jr RT, Upham KM, Forman EJ, et al. Cleavage-stage biopsy significantly impairs human embryonic implantation potential while blastocyst biopsy does not: a randomized and paired clinical trial. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:624–30.
13. Scott Jr RT, Upham KM, Forman EJ, et al. Blastocyst biopsy with comprehensive chromosome screening and fresh embryo transfer significantly increases in vitro fertilization implantation and delivery rates: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:697–703.
14. Zhu D, Zhang J, Cao S, et al. Vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles yield higher pregnancy and implantation rats compared with fresh blastocyst transfer cycles-time for a new embryo transfer strategy? Fertil Steril. 2011;95:1691–5.