Patriotic values for public goods: Transnational trade-offs for biodiversity and ecosystem services?

BioScience

Volumn 65, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 33-42

  Dallimer, Martin ^a   Bredahl, Jette ^b   Lundhede, Thomas Hedemark ^b   Takkis, Krista ^b   Giergiczny, Marek ^c   Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TARTU   (Estonia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

Author keywords

Biodiversity Conservation; Choice Experiment; Ecosystem Services; Nonmarket Valuation; Seminatural Grassland; Stated Preference

Indexed keywords

EID: 84982292116     PISSN: 00063568     EISSN: 15253244     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biu187     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Adamowicz W, Boxall P, Williams M, Louviere J. 1998. Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: Choice experiments and contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80: 64-75.
2. Adamowicz W, Swait J, Boxall P, Louviere J, Williams M. 1997. Perceptions versus objective measures of environmental quality in combined revealed and stated preference models of environmental valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 32: 65-84.
3. Ando A, Camm J, Polasky S, Solow A. 1998. Species distributions, land values, and efficient conservation. Science 279: 2126-2128.
4. Atkinson G, Bateman IJ, Mourato S. 2012. Recent advances in the valuation of ecosystem services and biodiversity. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 28: 22-47.
5. Balvanera P, Pfisterer AB, Buchmann N, He JS, Nakashizuka T, Raffaelli D, Schmid B. 2006. Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. Ecology Letters 9: 1146-1156.
6. Bartczak A, Lindhjem H, Navrud S, Zandersen M, Zylicz T. 2008. Valuing forest recreation on the national level in a transition economy: The case of Poland. Forest Policy and Economics 10: 467-472.
7. Bateman IJ. 2009. Bringing the real world into economic analyses of land use value: Incorporating spatial complexity. Land Use Policy 26: S30-S42.
8. Bateman IJ, et al. 2013. Bringing ecosystem services into economic decision-making: Land use in the United Kingdom. Science 341: 45-50.
9. Bauer S, Hoye BJ. 2014. Migratory animals couple biodiversity and ecosystem functioning worldwide. Science 344: 54
10. Bladt J, Strange N, Abildtrup J, Svenning JC, Skov F. 2009. Conservation efficiency of geopolitical coordination in the EU. Journal for Nature Conservation 17: 72-86
11. Bode M, Wilson KA, Brooks TM, Turner WR, Mittermeier RA, McBride MF, Underwood EC, Possingham HP. 2008. Cost-effective global conservation spending is robust to taxonomic group. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105: 6498-6501
12. Bulte E, van Soest DP, van Kooten GC, Schipper RA. 2002. Forest conservation in Costa Rica when nonuse benefits are uncertain but rising. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 84: 150-160
13. Cheke RA, Tratalos JA. 2007. Migration, patchiness, and population processes illustrated by two migrant pests. BioScience 57: 145-154
14. Christie M, Hanley N, Warren J, Murphy K, Wright R, Hyde T. 2006. Valuing the diversity of biodiversity. Ecological Economics 58: 304-317
15. Council of Europe. 2000. The European Landscape Convention. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities
16. Dallimer M, Jones PJ, Pemberton JM, Cheke RA. 2003. Lack of genetic and plumage differentiation in the red-billed quelea Quelea quelea across a migratory divide in southern Africa. Molecular Ecology 12: 345-353
17. Dallimer M, Tinch D, Hanley N, Irvine KN, Rouquette JR, Warren PH, Maltby L, Gaston KJ, Armsworth PR. 2014. Quantifying preferences for the natural world using monetary and nonmonetary assessments of value. Conservation Biology 28: 404-413
18. De Deyn GB, Shiel RS, Ostle NJ, McNamara NP, Oakley S, Young I, Freeman C, Fenner N, Quirk H, Bardgett RD. 2011. Additional carbon sequestration benefits of grassland diversity restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 48: 600-608
19. Donald PF, Sanderson FJ, Burfield IJ, Bierman SM, Gregory RD, Waliczky Z. 2007. International conservation policy delivers benefits for birds in Europe. Science 317: 810-813
20. [EEA] European Environment Agency. 2010. Tracking Progress towards Kyoto and 2020 Targets in Europe. EEA
21. European Commission. 1979. Council Directive 79/409/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the Conservation of Wild Birds. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities
22. Donald PF, Sanderson FJ, Burfield IJ, Bierman SM, Gregory RD, Waliczky Z. 1992. Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities
23. Donald PF, Sanderson FJ, Burfield IJ, Bierman SM, Gregory RD, Waliczky Z. 2000. Managing Natura 2000 Sites: The Provisions of Article 6 of the 'Habitats' Directive 92/43/EEC. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities
24. Donald PF, Sanderson FJ, Burfield IJ, Bierman SM, Gregory RD, Waliczky Z. 2008. LIFE and Europe's Grasslands: Restoring a Forgotten Habitat. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities
25. Ferrini S, Scarpa R. 2007. Designs with a priori information for nonmarket valuation with choice experiments: A Monte Carlo study. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 53: 342-363
26. Greene WH, Hensher DA. 2007. Heteroscedastic control for random coefficients and error components in mixed logit. Transportation Research E 43: 610-623
27. Hanley N, Barbier E. 2009. Pricing Nature: Cost-Benefit Analysis and Environmental Policy. Edward Elgar
28. Hanley N, Schlapfer F, Spurgeon J. 2003. Aggregating the benefits of environmental improvements: Distance-decay functions for use and non-use values. Journal of Environmental Management 68: 297-304
29. Hensher D, Louviere J, Swait J. 1999. Combining sources of preference data. Journal of Econometrics 89: 197-221
30. Jacobsen JB, Thorsen BJ. 2010. Preferences for site and environmental functions when selecting forthcoming national parks. Ecological Economics 69: 1532-1544
31. Jacobsen JB, Boiesen JH, Thorsen BJ, Strange N. 2008. What's in a name? The use of quantitative measures versus 'iconised' species when valuing biodiversity. Environmental and Resource Economics 39: 247-263
32. Jin JJ, Indab A, Nabangchang O, Truong DT, Harder D, Subade RF. 2010. Valuing marine turtle conservation: A cross-country study in Asian cities. Ecological Economics 69: 2020-2026
33. Kark S, Levin N, Grantham HS, Possingham HP. 2009. Between-country collaboration and consideration of costs increase conservation planning efficiency in the Mediterranean Basin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106: 15368-15373
34. Knowles B. 2011. Mountain Hay Meadows: Hotspots of Biodiversity and Traditional Culture. Society of Biology
35. Kumar P. 2010. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations. Earthscan
36. Lancaster KJ. 1966. New approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Economy 74: 132-157
37. Loomis JB, White DS. 1996. Economic benefits of rare and endangered species: Summary and meta-Analysis. Ecological Economics 18: 197-206
38. Lopez-Hoffman L, Varady RG, Flessa KW, Balvanera P. 2010. Ecosystem services across borders: A framework for transboundary conservation policy. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 8: 84-91
39. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis. World Resources Institute
40. Mace GM, Norris K, Fitter AH. 2012. Biodiversity and ecosystem services: A multilayered relationship. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 27: 19-26
41. McFadden D. 1974. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Pages 105-142 in Zarembka P, ed. Frontiers in Econometrics. Academic Press
42. Meyerhoff J, Liebe U. 2008. Do protest responses to a contingent valuation question and a choice experiment differ? Environmental and Resource Economics 39: 433-446
43. Morse-Jones S, Bateman IJ, Kontoleon A, Ferrini S, Burgess ND, Turner RK. 2012. Stated preferences for tropical wildlife conservation amongst distant beneficiaries: Charisma, endemism, scope and substitution effects. Ecological Economics 78: 9-18
44. Ready R, Navrud S. 2006. International benefit transfer: Methods and validity tests. Ecological Economics 60: 429-434
45. Sachs JD, et al. 2009. Biodiversity conservation and the Millennium Development Goals. Science 325: 1502-1503
46. Sand-Jensen K. 2007. Naturen i Danmark: Det Abne Land [Danish nature: The Open Landscape]. Gyldendal
47. Scarpa R, Rose JM. 2008. Design efficiency for non-market valuation with choice modelling: How to measure it, what to report and why. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 52: 253-282
48. Scarpa R, Ferrini S, Willis K. 2005. Performance of error component models for status-quo effects in choice experiments. Pages 247-273 in Scarpa R, Alberini A, eds. Applications of Simulation Methods in Environmental and Resource Economics, vol. 6. Springer
49. Semmens DJ, Diffendorfer JE, Lopez-Hoffman L, Shapiro CD. 2011. Accounting for the ecosystem services of migratory species: Quantifying migration support and spatial subsidies. Ecological Economics 70: 2236-2242
50. [UKNEA] UK National Ecosystem Assessment. 2011. The UK National Ecosystem Assessment: Technical Report. United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre
51. Veen P, Jefferson R, de Smidt J, van der Straaten J, eds. 2009. Grasslands in Europe of High Nature Value. KNNV
52. Zak PJ, Knack S. 2001. Trust and growth. Economic Journal 111: 295-321