Heteroscedastic control for random coefficients and error components in mixed logit

Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review

Volumn 43, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 610-623

  Greene, William H ^a   Hensher, David A ^b  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Discrete choice; Elasticities; Error components; Mixed logit; Value of time savings

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL POWER; CONDITION; DISCRETE CHOICE; ERROR COMPONENTS; HETEROSCEDASTIC; MIXED LOGIT; RANDOM COEFFICIENTS; RANDOM PARAMETERS; VALUE OF TIME; VALUE OF TIME SAVING;

DISCRETE CHOICE ANALYSIS; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; ERROR CORRECTION; LOGIT ANALYSIS; SIMULATION;

EID: 34250799196     PISSN: 13665545     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2006.02.001     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Ben-Akiva, M., Bolduc, D., Walker, J., 2001. Specification, identification and estimation of the logit kernel (or continuous mixed logit) model, MIT Working paper, Department of Civil Engineering.
2. Bhat C.R. Quasi-random maximum simulated likelihood estimation of the mixed multinomial logit model. Transportation Research Part B 35 (2001) 677-693
3. Brownstone D., and Train K. Forecasting new product penetration with flexible substitution patterns. Journal of Econometrics 89 (1999) 109-129
4. Gopinath, D., Schofield, M., Walker, J., Ben-Akiva, M., 2004. Comparative analysis of discrete choice models with flexible substitution patterns. Paper prepared for the 2005 Annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC.
5. Gourieroux C., and Monfort A. Simulation-Based Methods Econometric Methods (1996), Oxford University Press, Oxford
6. Greene, W.H., 2003. Interpreting estimated parameters and measuring individual heterogeneity in random coefficient models, Department of Economics, Stern School of Business, New York University.
7. Greene W.H., Hensher D.A., and Rose J. Accounting for heterogeneity in the variance of unobserved effects in mixed logit models. Transportation Research B 4 1 (2006) 75-92
8. Hensher D.A., and Greene W.H. Mixed logit models: state of practice. Transportation 30 2 (2003) 133-176
9. Hensher, D.A., Rose, J., in press. Development of commuter and non-commuter mode choice models for the assessment of new public transport infrastructure projects: a case study. Transportation Research A.
10. Hensher D.A., Rose J., and Greene W.H. Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer (2005), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
11. Louviere J.J., Hensher D.A., and Swait J.F. Stated Choice Methods and Analysis (2000), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
12. McFadden D., and Train K. Mixed MNL models for discrete response. Journal of Applied Econometrics 15 (2000) 447-470
13. Revelt D., and Train K. Mixed Logit with repeated choices: households' choices of appliance efficiency level. Review of Economics and Statistics 80 (1998) 1-11
14. Train K. Recreation demand models with taste differences over people. Land Economics 74 (1998) 230-239
15. Train, K., 2001. A comparison of hierarchical Bayes and maximum simulated likelihood for mixed logit. Working paper, Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley. Available from: .
16. Train K. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (2003), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
17. Train, K., Revelt, D., 2000. Customer-specific taste parameters and mixed logit. Working paper, Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley. Available from: .