Comparing young adults to older adults in e-cigarette perceptions and motivations for use: Implications for health communication

Health Education Research

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 429-438

  Cooper, Maria ^a   Harrell, Melissa B ^a   Perry, Cheryl L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ELECTRONIC CIGARETTE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MOTIVATION; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; SMOKING; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; ELECTRONIC NICOTINE DELIVERY SYSTEMS; FEMALE; HEALTH COMMUNICATION; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MOTIVATION; SMOKING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84982152566     PISSN: 02681153     EISSN: 14653648     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/her/cyw030     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Dwyer JB, McQuown SC, Leslie FM. The dynamic effects of nicotine on the developing brain. Pharmacol Ther 2009; 122: 125-39.
2. Agaku IT, King BA, Husten CG, et al. Tobacco product use among adults-United States, 2012-2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2014; 63: 542-7.
3. Arrazola R, Dube SR, King BA. Tobacco product usemiddle and high school students- United States 2011-2012.MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2013 62 893-7.
4. Pearson JL, Richardson A, Niaura RS, et al. e-Cigarette awareness, use, and harm perceptions in US adults. Am J Public Health 2012; 102: 1758-66.
5. Pokhrel P, Fagan P, Kehl L, et al. Receptivity to e-cigarette marketing, harm perceptions, and e-cigarette use. Am J Health Behav 2015; 39: 121-31.
6. Evans SE, Hoffman AC. Electronic cigarettes: abuse liability, topography and subjective effects. Tob Control 2014; 23(Suppl 2): ii23-9.
7. Goniewicz ML, Lingas EO, Hajek P. Patterns of electronic cigarette use and user beliefs about their safety and benefits: an internet survey. Drug Alcohol Rev 2013; 32: 133-40.
8. Dawkins L, Turner J, Hasna S, Soar K. The electronic-cigarette: effects on desire to smoke, withdrawal symptoms and cognition. Addict Behav 2012; 37: 970-3.
9. Sutfin EL, McCoy TP, Morrell HE, et al. Electronic cigarette use by college students. Drug Alcohol Depend 2013; 131: 214-21.
10. Pokhrel P, Herzog TA, Muranaka N, et al. Young adult ecigarette users reasons for liking and not liking e-cigarettes: a qualitative study. Psychol Health 2015; 15: 1-20.
11. Levinson AH, Campo S, Gascoigne J, et al. Smoking, but not smokers: identity among college students who smoke cigarettes. Nicotine Tob Res 2007; 9: 845-52.
12. Bullen C, Howe C, Laugesen M, et al. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2013; 382: 1629-37.
13. Caponnetto P, Campagna D, Cibella F, et al. EffiCiency and Safety of an eLectronic cigAreTte (ECLAT) as tobacco cigarettes substitute: a prospective 12-month randomized control design study. PLoS One 2013; 8: e66317.
14. Siegel MB, Tanwar KL, Wood KS. Electronic cigarettes as a smoking-cessation: tool results from an online survey. Am J Prev Med 2011; 40: 472-5.
15. Al-Delaimy WK, Myers MG, Leas EC, et al. E-Cigarette Use in the Past and Quitting Behavior in the Future A Population-Based Study. Am J Public Health 2015; e1-7.
16. Allehebi RO, Khan M, StanbrookMB. Efficacy and safety of electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation: a systematic review. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015; 191: A3715.
17. Barbeau AM, Burda J, Siegel M. Perceived efficacy of ecigarettes versus nicotine replacement therapy among successful e-cigarette users: a qualitative approach. Addict Sci Clin Pract 2013; 8: 5.
18. Texas Department of State Health Services. Peers Against Tobacco. 2015 Available at http://peersagainsttobacco.org/.Accessed: 1 June 2016.
19. CaliforniaDepartment of Public Health. Still blowing smoke. 2015 Available at http://stillblowingsmoke.org/.Accessed: 1 June 2016.
20. US Department of Health and Human Services. No Safe Tobacco. The Real Cost Available at http://therealcost. betobaccofree.hhs.gov/facts/no-safe-Tobacco/index.html Accessed: 1 June 2016.
21. Morse JM. The significance of saturation. Qual Health Res 1995; 5: 147-9.
22. Montano D, Kasprzyk D. Theory of reasoned action, theory of planned behavior, and the integrated behavioral model. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath, K (eds). Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2008, 67-92.
23. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousands Oak, CA: Sage, 1994.
24. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006; 3: 77-101.
25. Cooper M, Harrel MB, Perry CL. A qualitative approach to understanding real world e-cigarette use: implications for measurement and regulatipn. Prev Chronic Dis 2016; 13: 1-9.
26. McDonald EA, Ling PM. One of several toys for smoking: young adult experiences with electronic cigarettes in New York City. Tob Control 24(6): 588-93.
27. Teter CJ, McCabe SE, Cranford JA, et al. Prevalence and Motives for Illicit Use of Prescription Stimulants in an Undergraduate Student Sample. J Am Coll Health 2005; 53: 253-62.
28. Etter JF, Eissenberg T. Dependence levels in users of electronic cigarettes, nicotine gums and tobacco cigarettes. Drug Alcohol Depend 2015; 147: 68-75.
29. Dawkins L, Turner J, Hasna S, et al. Vaping profiles and preferences: an online survey of electronic cigarette users. Addiction 2013; 108: 1115-25.
30. Farsalinos KE, Romagna G, Tsiapras D, et al. Evaluating nicotine levels selection and patterns of electronic cigarette use in a group of vapers who had achieved complete substitution of smoking. Subst Abuse 2013; 7: 139-46.
31. Ramoâ CP, Hiler MM, Spindle TR, et al. Electronic cigarette nicotine delivery can exceed that of combustible cigarettes: a preliminary report. Tob Control 25: e6-9.
32. Choi K, Forster J. Characteristics associated with awareness, perceptions, and use of electronic nicotine delivery systems among young US Midwestern adults. Am J Public Health 2013; 103: 556-61.
33. Tan AS, Bigman CA. E-cigarette awareness and perceived harmfulness: prevalence and associations with smoking-cessation outcomes. Am J Prev Med 2014; 47: 141-9.
34. Etter JF, Bullen C. Electronic cigarette: users profile, utilization, satisfaction and perceived efficacy. Addiction 2011; 106: 2017-28.
35. Cheng T. Chemical evaluation of electronic cigarettes. Tob Control 2014; 23(Suppl 2): ii11-7.
36. Navarro HA, Seidler RD, Schwartz FE, et al. Prenatal exposure to nicotine impairs nervous systemdevelopment at a dose which does not affect viability or growth. Brain Res Bull 1989; 23: 187-92.
37. England LJ, Bunnell RE, Pechacek TF, et al. Nicotine and the developing human: a neglected element in the electronic cigarette debate. Am J Prev Med 2015; 49: 286-93.
38. Center for Health Promotion and Education. Office on Smoking and Health. The health consequences of smoking: nicotine addiction: a report of the surgeon general. In: Davis RM, Novotny TE, Lynn ER (eds). Public Health Service. United States: Office of the Surgeon General, 1988.