Electronic cigarette nicotine delivery can exceed that of combustible cigarettes: A preliminary report

Tobacco Control

Volumn 25, Issue E1, 2016, Pages e6-e9

  Ramôa, Carolina P ^a   Hiler, Marzena M ^a   Spindle, Tory R ^a   Lopez, Alexa A ^a   Karaoghlanian, Nareg ^c   Lipato, Thokozeni ^a,b   Breland, Alison B ^a   Shihadeh, Alan ^a,c   Eissenberg, Thomas ^a  

^a VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF BEIRUT   (Lebanon)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AEROSOL; NICOTINE; NICOTINIC AGENT;

ADULT; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AEROSOL; ANALYSIS; BLOOD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; DRUG ADMINISTRATION; ELECTRONIC CIGARETTE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHALATIONAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; MALE; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; TIME FACTOR; TOBACCO; TOBACCO USE DISORDER; VAPING; YOUNG ADULT;

ADMINISTRATION, INHALATION; ADULT; AEROSOLS; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; DRUG ADMINISTRATION SCHEDULE; ELECTRONIC CIGARETTES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NICOTINE; NICOTINIC AGONISTS; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; TIME FACTORS; TOBACCO PRODUCTS; TOBACCO USE DISORDER; VAPING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84962426039     PISSN: 09644563     EISSN: 14683318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052447     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bunnell R, Agaku I, Arrazola R, et al. Intentions to smoke cigarettes among never-smoking US middle and high school electronic cigarette users: National Youth Tobacco Survey, 2011–2013. Nicotine Tob Res 2015;17:228–35.
2. Li J, Newcombe R, Walton D. The prevalence, correlates and reasons for using electronic cigarettes among New Zealand adults. Addict Behav 2015;45: 245–51.
3. McMillen R, Gottlieb M, Shaefer R, et al. Trends in electronic cigarette use among U.S. adults: use is increasing in both smokers and nonsmokers. Nicotine Tob Res Published Online First: 6 Nov 2014. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntu213
4. King B, Alam S, Promoff G, et al. Awareness and ever-use of electronic cigarettes among U.S. adults, 2010–2011. Nicotine Tob Res 2013;15:1623–7.
5. Regan A, Promoff G, Dube S, et al. Electronic nicotine delivery systems: adult use and awareness of the ‘e-cigarette’ in the USA. Tob Control 2013; 22:19–23.
6. Grana R, Popova L, Ling P. A longitudinal analysis of electronic cigarette use and smoking cessation. JAMA Intern Med 2014;174:812–13.
7. Bullen C, McRobbie H, Thornley S, et al. Effect of an electronic nicotine delivery device (e cigarette) on desire to smoke and withdrawal, user preferences and nicotine delivery: randomised cross-over trial. Tob Control 2010;19:98–103.
8. Farsalinos K, Spyrou A, Tsimopoulou K, et al. Nicotine absorption from electronic cigarette use: comparison between first and new-generation devices. Sci Rep 2014;4:4133.
9. Vansickel A, Eissenberg T. Electronic cigarettes: effective nicotine delivery after acute administration. Nicotine Tob Res 2013;15:267–70.
10. Spindle T, Breland A, Karaoghlanian N, et al. Preliminary results of an examination of electronic cigarette user puff topography: the effect of a mouthpiece-based topography measurement device on plasma nicotine and subjective effects. Nicotine Tob Res 2015;17:142–9.
11. Hua M, Yip H, Talbot P. Mining data on usage of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) from YouTube videos. Tob Control 2013;22:103–6.
12. Farsalinos K, Romagna G, Tsiapras D, et al. Evaluation of electronic cigarette use (vaping) topography and estimation of liquid consumption: implications for research protocol standards definition and for public health authorities’ regulation. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2013;10:2500–14.
13. Talih S, Balhas Z, Eissenberg T, et al. Effects of user puff topography, device voltage, and liquid nicotine concentration on electronic cigarette nicotine yield: measurements and model predictions. Nicotine Tob Res 2015;17: 150–7.
14. Vansickel A, Cobb C, Weaver M, et al. A clinical laboratory model for evaluating the acute effects of electronic “cigarettes”: nicotine delivery profile and cardiovascular and subjective effects. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010;19:1945–53.
15. Breland A, Kleykamp B, Eissenberg T. Clinical laboratory evaluation of potential reduced exposure products for smokers. Nicotine Tob Res 2006;8:727–38.
16. Keppel G. Design and analysis, a researcher’s handbook. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1991.
17. Yan XS, D’Ruiz C. Effects of using electronic cigarettes on nicotine delivery and cardiovascular function in comparison with regular cigarettes. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2015;71:24–34.
18. Behar R, Hua M, Talbot P. Puffing topography and nicotine intake of electronic cigarette users. PLoS ONE 2015;10:e0117222.