Olfactory perception of chemically diverse molecules

BMC Neuroscience

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Keller, Andreas ^a   Vosshall, Leslie B ^a,b  

^a ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cheminformatics; Odor descriptors; Olfaction; Perceptual familiarity; Perceptual variability; Psychophysics; Structure odor relationship

Indexed keywords

GARLIC; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; ODOR; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; STIMULUS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; RECOGNITION; SEMANTICS; SMELLING; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; YOUNG ADULT;

FRAGRANCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; DATASETS AS TOPIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ODORANTS; OLFACTORY PERCEPTION; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SEMANTICS; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84981240734     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712202     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12868-016-0287-2     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Boelens H. Structure activity relationships in chemoreception by human olfaction. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1983;4(10):421-6.
2. Edwards PA, Jurs PC. Correlation of odor intensities with structural properties of odorants. Chem Senses. 1989;14(2):281-91.
3. Mainland JD, Lundström JN, Reisert J, Lowe G. From molecule to mind: an integrative perspective on odor intensity. Trends Neurosci. 2014;37(8):443-54.
4. Zarzo M. Hedonic judgments of chemical compounds are correlated with molecular size. Sensors. 2011;11(4):3667-86.
5. Kermen F, Chakirian A, Sezille C, Joussain P, Le Goff G, Ziessel A, Chastrette M, Mandairon N, Didier A, Rouby C, et al. Molecular complexity determines the number of olfactory notes and the pleasantness of smells. Sci Reports. 2011;1:206.
6. Khan RM, Luk CH, Flinker A, Aggarwal A, Lapid H, Haddad R, Sobel N. Predicting odor pleasantness from odorant structure: pleasantness as a reflection of the physical world. J Neurosci. 2007;27(37):10015-23.
7. Hendrickson JB, Huang P, Toczko AG. Molecular complexity: a simplified formula adapted to individual atoms. J Chem Inf Model. 1987;27:63-7.
8. Menashe I, Man O, Lancet D, Gilad Y. Different noses for different people. Nat Genet. 2003;34(2):143-4.
9. Keller A, Zhuang H, Chi Q, Vosshall LB, Matsunami H. Genetic variation in a human odorant receptor alters odour perception. Nature. 2007;449(7161):468-72.
10. Olender T, Waszak SM, Viavant M, Khen M, Ben-Asher E, Reyes A, Nativ N, Wysocki CJ, Ge DL, Lancet D. Personal receptor repertoires: olfaction as a model. BMC Genom. 2012;13:414.
11. Keydar I, Ben-Asher E, Feldmesser E, Nativ N, Oshimoto A, Restrepo D, Matsunami H, Chien M-S, Pinto JM, Gilad Y, et al. General olfactory sensitivity database (GOSdb): candidate genes and their genomic variations. Hum Mutat. 2013;34(1):32-41.
12. Mainland JD, Keller A, Li YR, Zhou T, Trimmer C, Snyder LL, Moberly AH, Adipietro KA, Liu WLL, Zhuang H, et al. The missense of smell: functional variability in the human odorant receptor repertoire. Nat Neurosci. 2014;17(1):114-20.
13. Menashe I, Abaffy T, Hasin Y, Goshen S, Yahalom V, Luetje CW, Lancet D. Genetic elucidation of human hyperosmia to isovaleric acid. PLoS Biol. 2007;5(11):e284.
14. Hasin-Brumshtein Y, Lancet D, Olender T. Human olfaction: from genomic variation to phenotypic diversity. Trends Genet. 2009;25(4):178-84.
15. Lunde K, Egelandsdal B, Skuterud E, Mainland JD, Lea T, Hersleth M, Matsunami H. Genetic variation of an odorant receptor OR7D4 and sensory perception of cooked meat containing androstenone. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e35259.
16. McRae JF, Mainland JD, Jaeger SR, Adipietro KA, Matsunami H, Newcomb RD. Genetic variation in the odorant receptor OR2J3 is associated with the ability to detect the 'grassy' smelling odor, cis-3-hexen-1-ol. Chem Senses. 2012;37(7):585-93.
17. Wysocki CJ, Beauchamp GK. Individual differences in human olfaction. In: Wysocki CJ, Kare MR, editors. Genetics of Perception and Communications. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.; 1988. p. 353-73.
18. Lundstrom JN, Hummel T, Olsson MJ. Individual differences in sensitivity to the odor of 4,16-androstadien-3-one. Chem Senses. 2003;28(7):643-50.
19. Keller A, Hempstead M, Gomez IA, Gilbert AN, Vosshall LB. An olfactory demography of a diverse metropolitan population. BMC Neurosci. 2012;13:122.
20. Frank RA, Byram J. Taste-smell interactions are tastant and odorant dependent. Chem Senses. 1988;13(3):445-55.
21. Dravnieks A. Atlas of odor character profiles. Philadelphia: ASTM; 1985.
22. Arctander S. Perfume and flavor materials of natural origin. Montclair: Arctander; 1961.
23. Arctander S. Perfume and flavor chemicals (Aroma Chemicals). Montclair: Arctander; 1969.
24. Gilbert AN, Greenberg MS. Stimulus selection in the design and interpretation of olfactory studies. In: Serby MJ, Chobor KL, editors. Science of olfaction. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1992. p. 309-34.
25. Chastrette M, Thomas-Danguin T, Rallet E. Modelling the human olfactory stimulus-response function. Chem Senses. 1998;23:181-96.
26. Todeschini R, Consonni V. Molecular descriptors for chemoinformatics, alphabetical listing, vol. 1. New York: Wiley; 2009.
27. Todeschini R, Consonni V. Molecular descriptors for chemoinformatics. appendices, bibliography, vol. 2. New York: Wiley; 2009.
28. Rossiter KJ. Structure-odor relationships. Chem Rev. 1996;96(8):3201-40.
29. Sell C. Structure-odor relationships: on the unpredictability of odor. Angew Chem Int Edit. 2006;45(38):6254-61.
30. Snitz K, Yablonka A, Weiss T, Frumin I, Khan RM, Sobel N. Predicting odor perceptual similarity from odor structure. PLoS Comp Biol. 2013;9(9):e1003184.
31. Stolovitzky G, Monroe D, Califano A. Dialogue on reverse-engineering assessment and methods. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2007;1115:1-22.