Erratum: Molecular complexity determines the number of olfactory notes and the pleasantness of smells (Scientific Reports (2011) 1 (206) DOI: 10.1038/srep00206);Molecular complexity determines the number of olfactory notes and the pleasantness of smells

Scientific Reports

Volumn 1, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Kermen, F ^a,b   Chakirian, A ^a,b   Sezille, C ^a,b   Joussain, P ^a,b   Le Goff, G ^a,b   Ziessel, A ^a,b   Chastrette, M ^a,b   Mandairon, N ^a,b   Didier, A ^a,b   Rouby, C ^a,b   Bensafi, M ^a,b  

^a LYON NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH CENTER   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LIGAND;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; ODOR; OLFACTORY RECEPTOR; PERCEPTION; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PHYSIOLOGY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIGANDS; MALE; ODORS; OLFACTORY RECEPTOR NEURONS; PERCEPTION; RECEPTORS, ODORANT; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; SMELL; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84859735325     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep01132     Document Type: Erratum

References (30)

1. Malnic, B., Hirono, J., Sato, T. & Buck, L. B. Combinatorial receptor codes for odors. Cell 96, 713-23 (1999). (Pubitemid 29122813)
2. Arctander, S. Perfume and flavor chemicals: (aroma chemicals).(Allured Pub. Corp. : Carol Stream IL, 1994).
3. Chastrette, M., Elmouaffek, A. & Sauvegrain, P. A multidimensional statistical study of similarities between 74 notes used in perfumery. Chem Senses 13, 295-305 (1988). (Pubitemid 19173128)
4. Hann, M. M., Leach, A. R. & Harper, G. Molecular complexity and its impact on the probability of finding leads for drug discovery. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 41, 856-64 (2001).
5. Hendrickson, J. B., Huang, P. & Toczko, A. G. Molecular complexity: a simplified formula adapted to individual atoms. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 27, 63-67 (1987). (Pubitemid 17582817)
6. Keller, A., Zhuang, H., Chi, Q., Vosshall, L. B. & Matsunami, H. Genetic variation in a human odorant receptor alters odour perception. Nature 449, 468-72 (2007). (Pubitemid 47509549)
7. O'Doherty, J. et al. Sensory-Specific Satiety-Related Olfactory Activation of the Human Orbitofrontal Cortex. Neuroreport 11, 399-403 (2000). (Pubitemid 30074657)
8. Wilson, D. A. & Stevenson, R. J. Olfactory perceptual learning: the critical role of memory in odor discrimination. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 27, 307-28 (2003). (Pubitemid 36999831)
9. Herz, R. S. The effect of verbal context on olfactory perception. J Exp Psychol Gen 132, 595-606 (2003). (Pubitemid 37514235)
10. Poncelet, J. et al. Semantic knowledge influences prewired hedonic responses to odors. PLoS One 5, e13878 (2010).
11. Poncelet, J. et al. The effect of early experience on odor perception in humans: psychological and physiological correlates. Behav Brain Res 208, 458-65 (2010).
12. Rinck, F. et al. Ontogeny of odor liking during childhood and its relation to language development. Chem Senses 36, 83-91 (2011).
13. Joussain, P., Chakirian, A., Kermen, F., Rouby, C. & Bensafi, M. Physicochemical influence on odor hedonics: Where does it occur first? Commun Integr Biol 4, 563-5 (2011).
14. Zarzo, M. Hedonic Judgments of Chemical Compounds Are Correlated with Molecular Size. Sensors 11, 3667-3686 (2011).
15. Mandairon, N., Poncelet, J., Bensafi, M. & Didier, A. Humans and mice express similar olfactory preferences. PLoS One 4, e4209 (2009).
16. Khan, R. M. et al. Predicting odor pleasantness from odorant structure: pleasantness as a reflection of the physical world. J Neurosci 27, 10015-23 (2007). (Pubitemid 47404006)
17. Schiffman, S. S. Contributions to the physicochemical dimensions of odor: a psychophysical approach. Ann N Y Acad Sci 237, 164-83 (1974).
18. Chastrette, M. in Olfaction, Taste and Cognition (eds. Rouby, C., Schaal, B., Dubois, D., Gervais, R. & Holley, A. ) 100-116 (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2002).
19. Rouby, C., Schaal, B., Dubois, D., Gervais, R. & Holley, A. Olfaction, Taste and Cognition (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2002).
20. Amoore, J. E. Current Status of the Steric Theory of Odor. Ann N Y Acad Sci 116, 457-476 (1964).
21. Wright, R. H. Odour and chemical constitution. Nature 173, 831 (1954).
22. Mozell, M. M. Evidence for a chromatographic model of olfaction. J Gen Physiol. 56, 46-63 (1970).
23. Moskowitz, H. R. in Preference behaviour and chemoreception (ed. Kroeze, J. H. A. ) 131-144 (Information Retrieval, London, 1979).
24. Ayabe-Kanamura, S., Kikuchi, T. & Saito, S. Effect of verbal cues on recognition memory and pleasantness evaluation of unfamiliar odors. Perceptual & Motor Skills 85, 275-285 (1997). (Pubitemid 127727390)
25. Distel, H. & Hudson, R. Judgement of odor intensity is influenced by subjects' knowledge of the odor source. Chem Senses 26, 247-51 (2001). (Pubitemid 32318374)
26. Saito, H., Chi, Q., Zhuang, H., Matsunami, H. & Mainland, J. D. Odor coding by a Mammalian receptor repertoire. Sci Signal 2, ra9 (2009).
27. Haddad, R. et al. Global features of neural activity in the olfactory system form a parallel code that predicts olfactory behavior and perception. J Neurosci 30, 9017-26 (2010).
28. Kreher, S. A., Mathew, D., Kim, J. & Carlson, J. R. Translation of sensory input into behavioral output via an olfactory system. Neuron 59, 110-24 (2008). (Pubitemid 351905856)
29. Rouby, C., Bourgeat, F., Rinck, F., Poncelet, J. & Bensafi, M. Perceptual and sensorimotor differences between "good" and "poor" olfactory mental imagers. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1170, 333-7 (2009).
30. Thomas-Danguin, T. et al. Development of the ETOC: a European test of olfactory capabilities. Rhinology 41, 142-51 (2003). (Pubitemid 37254095)