Automated identification of molecular effects of drugs (AIMED)

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 758-765

  Fathiamini, Safa ^a   Johnson, Amber M ^b   Zeng, Jia ^b   Araya, Alejandro ^a   Holla, Vijaykumar ^b   Bailey, Ann M ^b   Litzenburger, Beate C ^b   Sanchez, Nora S ^b   Khotskaya, Yekaterina ^b   Xu, Hua ^a   Meric Bernstam, Funda ^b   Bernstam, Elmer V ^a,c   Cohen, Trevor ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomedical question answering; Molecular; Pharmacogenomics; Precision oncology; SemRep; Targeted therapy

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; KNOWLEDGE BASE; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MOLECULARLY TARGETED THERAPY; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); GENETICS; HUMAN; MEDLINE; NEOPLASM; PROCEDURES; SEMANTICS; UNIFIED MEDICAL LANGUAGE SYSTEM;

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENTS; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; MEDLINE; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; NEOPLASMS; PRECISION MEDICINE; SEMANTICS; UNIFIED MEDICAL LANGUAGE SYSTEM;

EID: 84981225429     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocw030     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Garraway LA, Verweij J, Ballman KV, et al. Precision oncology: An overview. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:1803-1805.
2. Meric-Bernstam F, Farhangfar C, Mendelsohn J, et al. Building a personalized medicine infrastructure at a major cancer center. J Clin. 2013;31:1849-1857.
3. Johnson A, Zeng J, Bailey AM, et al. The right drugs at the right time for the right patient: the MD Anderson precision oncology decision support platform. Drug Discov Today 2015;20:1433-1438.
4. Rindflesch TC, Fiszman M. The interaction of domain knowledge and linguistic structure in natural language processing: interpreting hypernymic propositions in biomedical text. J Biomed Inform. 2003;36:462-477.
5. Aronson AR. Effective Mapping of Biomedical Text to the UMLS Metathesaurus: The MetaMap Program. http://skr.nlm.nih.gov/papers/references/ metamap_01AMIA.pdf. Accessed July 16, 2015.
6. Westbrook JI, Coiera EW, Gosling AS. Do online information retrieval systems help experienced clinicians answer clinical questions? J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005;12:315-321.
7. Westbrook JI, Gosling AS, Coiera EW. Do clinicians use online evidence to support patient care? A study of 55,000 clinicians. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004;11:113-120.
8. Hersh WR, Crabtree MK, Hickam DH, et al. Factors associated with successful answering of clinical questions using an information retrieval system. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 2000;88:323.
9. Hersh WR, Crabtree MK, Hickam DH, et al. Factors associated with success in searching MEDLINE and applying evidence to answer clinical questions. JAMIA. 2002;9:283-293.
10. Haynes RB, McKibbon KA, Walker CJ, et al. Online access to MEDLINE in clinical settings. A study of use and usefulness. Ann Intern Med. 1990;112: 78-84.
11. Herskovic JR, Tanaka LY, Hersh W, et al. A day in the life of PubMed: analysis of a typical day's query log. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14: 212-220.
12. Hersh WR, SpringerLink (Online service). Information Retrieval: a Health and Biomedical Perspective. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2009.
13. Athenikos SJ, Han H. Biomedical question answering: a survey. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2010;99:1-24.
14. Voorhees EM. Question Answering in TREC. In: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2001: 535-537.
15. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Text REtrieval Conference (TREC). http://trec.nist.gov. Accessed August 7, 2015.
16. Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU). TREC Genomics Track. http:// skynet.ohsu.edu/trec-gen. Accessed August 7, 2015.
17. Hersh W, Voorhees E. TREC genomics special issue overview. http://skynet. ohsu.edu/-hersh/ir-09-trecgen.pdf. Accessed August 2, 2015.
18. Hersh W, Cohen AM, Roberts P, et al. TREC 2006 Genomics Track Overview. Published Online First: 2006. http://www.citeulike.org/group/ 1014/article/972764. Accessed August 7, 2015.
19. Rekapalli HK, Cohen AM, Hersh WR. A comparative analysis of retrieval features used in the TREC 2006 Genomics Track passage retrieval task. In: AMIA. . . Annual Symposium Proceedings/AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium. 2006. 620-4. http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/18693910. Accessed August 5, 2015.
20. Ide NC, Loane RF, Demner-Fushman D. Essie: a concept-based search engine for structured biomedical text. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14: 253-263.
21. Yu H, Sable C. Being Erlang Shen: identifying answerable questions. http:// cluster.cis.drexel.edu:8080/sofia/resources/QA.Data/PDF/M_2005_IJCAI_ Yu_and_Sable_Being_Erlang_Shen-Identifying_Answerable_Questions-0520589825/M_2005_IJCAI_Yu_and_Sable_Being_Erlang_Shen-Identifying_Answerable_Questions.pdf. Accessed August 15, 2015.
22. Rinaldi F, Dowdall J, Schneider G. Answering questions in the genomics domain. Citeseer 2004. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi= 10.1.1.498.3835&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed August 15, 2015.
23. Zweigenbaum P. Question answering in biomedicine. In: Proceedings Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Question Answering, EACL. Citeseer 2003. 1-4. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1. 1.14.9942&rep=rep1&type=pdf#page=10. Accessed August 3, 2015.
24. Zweigenbaum P. Knowledge and reasoning for medical question-answering. In: Proceedings of the 2009 Workshop on Knowledge and Reasoning for Answering Questions. Association for Computational Linguistics; 2009:1-2. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1697289. Accessed August 15, 2015.
25. Moldovan D, Ca MP, Harabagiu S, et al. Performance issues and error analysis in an open-domain question answering system. ACM Trans Inf Syst. 2003;21:133-154.
26. Hersh W, Cohen AM, Ruslen L, et al. TREC 2007 Genomics Track Overview. Published Online First: 2007. http://trec.nist.gov/pubs/trec16/t16_proceedings. html. Accessed August 7, 2015.
27. Hristovski D, Dinevski D, Kastrin A, et al. Biomedical question answering using semantic relations. BMC Bioinformatics. 2015;16:1.
28. Bodenreider O. The unified medical language system (UMLS): integrating biomedical terminology. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:D267-D270.
29. Kilicoglu H, Shin D, Fiszman M, et al. SemMedDB: a PubMed-scale repository of biomedical semantic predications. Bioinformatics. 2012;28: 3158-3160.
30. At M. The UMLS Semantic Network. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Sic Med Care Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1989;503-507.
31. Lister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications, Cognitive Science Branch. SemMedDB Info. http://skr3.nlm.nih.gov/SemMedDB/ dbinfo.html. Accessed April 28, 2015.
32. Lister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications, Cognitive Science Branch. SemMedDB_UTH Database Outline. http://skr3.nlm.nih. gov/SemMedDB/index_uth.html. Accessed August 11, 2015.
33. Lister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications, Cognitive Science Branch. SemMedDB Download. http://skr3.nlm.nih.gov/ SemMedDB/download/download.html. Accessed April 28, 2015.
34. United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The FDA's Drug Review Process: Ensuring Drugs Are Safe and Effective. http://www.fda.gov/drugs/ resourcesforyou/consumers/ucm143534.htm. Accessed September 14, 2015.
35. Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center. My Cancer Genome, Genetically Informed Cancer Medicine. http://www.mycancergenome.org. Accessed September 12, 2015.
36. Griffith M, Griffith OL, Coffman AC, et al. DGIdb -Mining the druggable genome. Nat Methods. 2013;10.
37. Demner-Fushman D, Chapman WW, McDonald CJ. What can natural language processing do for clinical decision support? J Biomed Inform. 2009;42:760-772.
38. Cruchet S, Gaudinat A, Rindflesch T, et al. What about trust in the Question Answering world. In: AMIA 2009 Annual Symposium. 2009. http://www.hon. ch/Conf/Docs/submittedpaper_QA_HON_NLM.pdf. Accessed August 2, 2015.
39. Bodenreider O. Provenance information in biomedical knowledge repositories -a use case. In: SWPM. Citeseer 2009. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/ download?doi=10.1.1.154.1164&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed April 28, 2015.
40. Carroll JJ, Bizer C, Hayes P, et al. Named graphs, provenance and trust. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM 2005: 613-622. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1060835. Accessed April 28, 2015.
41. Nguyen V, Bodenreider O, Sheth A. Don't like RDF reification?: making statements about statements using singleton property. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee 2014; 759-770. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2567973. Accessed April 28, 2015.
42. Lopez V, Motta E, Uren V, et al. State of the art on semantic question answering. Citeseer 2007. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download? doi=10.1.1.107.1922&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed August 9, 2015.
43. Basili R, Hansen DH, Paggio P, et al. Ontological Resources and Question Answering. In: Workshop on Pragmatics of Question Answering, held in conjunction with NAACL 2004. 1-8. http://forskningsbasen.deff.dk/Share. external?sp=S3f703020-0197-11de-b05e-000ea68e967b&sp=Sku. Accessed August 9, 2015.
44. Sneiderman CA, Demner-Fushman D, FiszmanM, et al. Knowledge-based methods to help clinicians find answers in MEDLINE. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14:772-780.
45. Demner-Fushman D, Lin J. Answering clinical questions with knowledgebased and statistical techniques. Comput Linguist. 2007;33. http://www. lhncbc.nlm.nih.gov/files/archive/pub2007004.pdf. Accessed August 2, 2015.
46. Cairns BL, Nielsen RD, Masanz JJ, et al. The MiPACQ Clinical Question Answering System. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2011;2011:171-180.
47. Hirschman L, Gaizauskas R. Natural language question answering: the view from here. Nat Lang Eng. 2001;7:275-300.
48. UpToDate. http://www.uptodate.com. Accessed September 14, 2015.
49. Salton G, McGill MJ. Introduction to modern information retrieval. Published Online First: 1986. http://www.citeulike.org/group/1808/article/821224. Accessed January 29, 2016.
50. Hearst MA, Pedersen JO. Reexamining the cluster hypothesis: scatter/ gather on retrieval results. In: Proceedings of the 19th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM; 1996:76-84. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=243216. Accessed January 29, 2016.
51. Pedersen T, Pakhomov SV, Patwardhan S, et al. Measures of semantic similarity and relatedness in the biomedical domain. J Biomed Inform. 2007;40:288-299.
52. Kilicoglu H, Fiszman M, Rosemblat G, et al. Arguments of nominals in semantic interpretation of biomedical text. In: Proceedings of the 2010 Workshop on Biomedical Natural Language Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics; 2010: 46-54. http://dl.acm.org/citation. cfm?id=1869967 Accessed September 14, 2015.