Targeted estimation and inference for the sample average treatment effect in trials with and without pair-matching

Statistics in Medicine

Volumn 35, Issue 21, 2016, Pages 3717-3732

  Balzer, Laura B ^a   Petersen, Maya L ^b   van der Laan, Mark J ^b  

^a HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

cluster randomized trials; pair matching; population average treatment effect (PATE); sample average treatment effect (SATE); targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE)

Indexed keywords

ANTIRETROVIRUS AGENT;

ARTICLE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION; INCIDENCE; KENYA; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD; POPULATION RESEARCH; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SIMULATION; STATISTICAL MODEL; UGANDA;

EID: 84980349646     PISSN: 02776715     EISSN: 10970258     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sim.6965     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Rosenbaum P, Rubin D. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 1983; 70: 41–55.
2. Robins J. A new approach to causal inference in mortality studies with sustained exposure periods – application to control of the healthy worker survivor effect. Mathematical Modelling 1986; 7: 1393–1512.
3. Horvitz D, Thompson D. A generalization of sampling without replacement from a finite universe. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1952; 47: 663–685.
4. Shen C, Li X, Li L. Inverse probability weighting for covariate adjustment in randomized studies. Statistics in Medicine 2014; 33: 555–568.
5. Snowden J, Rose S, Mortimer K. Implementation of G-computation on a simulated data set: demonstration of a causal inference technique. American Journal of Epidemiology 2011; 173(7): 731–738.
6. Robins J, Rotnitzky A, Zhao L. Estimation of regression coefficients when some regressors are not always observed. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1994; 89: 846–866.
7. van der Laan M, Robins J. Unified Methods for Censored Longitudinal Data and Causality. Springer-Verlag: New York Berlin Heidelberg, 2003.
8. van der Laan M, Rubin D. Targeted maximum likelihood learning. The International Journal of Biostatistics 2006; 2(1): 1–38. 10.2202/1557-4679.1043.
9. van der Laan M, Rose S. Targeted Learning: Causal Inference for Observational and Experimental Data. Springer: New York Dordrecht Heidelberg London, 2011.
10. Neyman J. Sur les applications de la theorie des probabilites aux experiences agricoles: essai des principes (In Polish). English translation by D.M. Dabrowska and T.P. Speed (1990). Statistical Science 1923; 5: 465–480.
11. Rubin DB. Comment: Neyman (1923) and causal inference in experiments and observational studies. Statistical Science 1990; 5(4): 472–480.
12. Imbens G. Nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects under exogeneity: a review. Review of Economics and Statistics 2004; 86(1): 4–29.
13. Imai K. Variance identification and efficiency analysis in randomized experiments under the matched-pair design. Statistics in Medicine 2008; 27(24): 4857–4873.
14. Schochet P. Estimators for clustered education RCTs using the Neyman model for causal inference. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 2013; 38(3): 219–238.
15. Imbens G, Rubin D. Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences. Cambridge University Press: New York, 2015.
16. Cole S, Stuart E. Generalizing evidence from randomized clinical trials to target populations: the ACTG 320 Trial. American Journal of Epidemiology 2010; 172(1): 107–115.
17. Stuart E, Cole S, Bradshaw C, Leaf P. The use of propensity scores to assess the generalizability of results from randomized trials. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A 2011; 174(Part 2): 369–386.
18. Bareinboim E, Pearl J. A general algorithm for deciding transportability of experimental results. Journal of Causal Inference 2013; 1(1): 107–134.
19. Hartman E, Grieve R, Ramsahai R, Sekhon J. From sample average treatment effect to population average treatment effect on the treated: combining experimental with observational studies to estimate population treatment effects. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A 2015; 178(3): 757–778.
20. Balzer L, Petersen M, van der Laan M, the SEARCH Consortium. Adaptive pair-matching in randomized trials with unbiased and efficient effect estimation. Statistics in Medicine 2015; 34(6): 999–1011.
21. Klar N, Donner A. The merits of matching in community intervention trials: a cautionary tale. Statistics in Medicine 1997; 16(15): 1753–1764.
22. Greevy R, Lu B, Silber J, Rosenbaum P. Optimal multivariate matching before randomization. Biostatistics 2004; 5(2): 263–275.
23. Imai K, King G, Nall C. The essential role of pair matching in cluster-randomized experiments, with application to the Mexican Universal Health Insurance Evaluation. Statistical Science 2009; 24(1): 29–53.
24. Hayes R, Moulton L. Cluster Randomised Trials. Chapman & Hall/CRC: Boca Raton, 2009.
25. van der Laan M, Balzer LB, Petersen M. Adaptive matching in randomized trials and observational studies. Journal of Statistical Research 2012; 46(2): 113–156.
26. Pearl J. Causal diagrams for empirical research. Biometrika 1995; 82: 669–710.
27. University of California, San Francisco. Sustainable East Africa Research in Community Health (SEARCH). ClinicalTrials.gov, 2013. Available from: http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01864603 [Accessed on 6 April 2016].
28. Pearl J. Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference. Cambridge University Press: New York, 2000. Second ed., 2009.
29. van der Laan MJ, Hubbard AE, Kherad Pajouh S. Statistical inference for data adaptive target parameters, Technical Report 314, Division of Biostatistics, University of California, Berkeley, Available from: http://biostats.bepress.com/ucbbiostat/paper314/ [Accessed on 6 April 2016], 2013.
30. Hubbard A, van der Laan M. 2016. Mining with inference: data-adaptive target parameter. In Handbook of Big Data, P. Buhlmann, P. Drineas, M. Kane, M. van der Laan (eds).CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, LLC: Boca Raton, FL; 439–452.
31. Fisher RA. Statistical Methods for Research Workers (4th edn). Oliver and Boyd Ltd.: Edinburgh, 1932.
32. Cochran WG. Analysis of covariance: its nature and uses. Biometrics 1957; 13: 261–281.
33. Cox D, McCullagh P. Some aspects of analysis of covariance. Biometrics 1982; 38(3): 541–561.
34. Tsiatis A, Davidian M, Zhang M, Lu X. Covariate adjustment for two-sample treatment comparisons in randomized clinical trials: a principled yet flexible approach. Statistics in Medicine 2008; 27(23): 4658–4677.
35. Moore K, van der Laan M. Covariate adjustment in randomized trials with binary outcomes: targeted maximum likelihood estimation. Statistics in Medicine 2009; 28(1): 39–64.
36. Rosenblum M, van der Laan M. Simple, efficient estimators of treatment effects in randomized trials using generalized linear models to leverage baseline variables. The International Journal of Biostatistics 2010; 6(1): 1–41. DOI: 10.2202/1557-4679.1138.
37. European Medicines Agency. Guideline on adjustment for baseline covariates in clinical trials. London, 2015.
38. Abadie A, Imbens G. Simple and bias-corrected matching estimators for average treatment effects, Technical Report 283, NBER Technical Working Paper, 2002.
39. Gruber S, van der Laan M. A targeted maximum likelihood estimator of a causal effect on a bounded continuous outcome. The International Journal of Biostatistics 2010; 6(1): 1–14. 10.2202/1557-4679.1260.
40. Balzer L, Ahern J, Galea S, van der Laan M. Estimating effects with rare outcomes and high dimensional covariates: knowledge is power. Epidemiologic Methods. In Press.
41. van der Laan M, Polley E, Hubbard A. Super learner. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology 2007; 6(1): 1–21.
42. Hahn J. On the role of the propensity score in efficient semiparametric estimation of average treatment effects. Econometrica 1998; 2: 315–331.
43. Gruber S, van der Laan M. TMLE: an R package for targeted maximum likelihood estimation. Journal of Statistical Software 2012; 51(13): 1–35.
44. Schwab J, Lendle S, Petersen M, van der Laan M, Gruber S. LTMLE: longitudinal targeted maximum likelihood estimation, 2015. Available from: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ltmle, R package version 0.9-6 [Accessed on 6 April 2016].
45. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing,Vienna, Austria, 2015. Available from: http://www.R-project.org [Accessed on 6 April 2016].
46. Fisher RA. The Design of Experiments. Oliver and Boyd Ltd.: London, 1935.
47. Zhang K, Small D. Comment: the essential role of pair matching in cluster-randomized experiments, with application to the Mexican universal health insurance evaluation. Statistical Science 2009; 25(1): 59–64.
48. Lu B, Greevy R, Xu X, Beck C. Optimal nonbipartite matching and its statistical applications. American Statistician 2011; 65(1): 21–30.
49. Freedman L, Gail M, Green S, Corle D, The COMMIT Research Group. The efficiency of the matched-pairs design of the community intervention trial for smoking cessation (COMMIT). Controlled Clinical Trials 1997; 18(2): 131–139.
50. Campbell M, Donner A, Klar N. Developments in cluster randomized trials and Statistics in Medicine. Statistics in Medicine 2007; 26(1): 2–19.
51. Beck C, Lu B, Greevy R. nbpMatching: functions for optimal non-bipartite optimal matching, 2016. Available from:https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nbpMatching,R package version 1.5.0 [Accessed on 6 April 2016].
52. Balzer, L, M van der Laan, M Petersen.Adaptive pre-specification in randomized trials with and without pair-matching,In 336, Division of Biostatistics, University of California at Berkeley, 2015 Availablefrom: http://biostats.bepress.com/ucbbiostat/paper336/[Accessedon6April2016].