Strength and Water Interactions of Cellulose i Filaments Wet-Spun from Cellulose Nanofibril Hydrogels

Scientific Reports

Volumn 6, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Lundahl, Meri J ^a   Cunha, A Gisela ^a   Rojo, Ester ^a   Papageorgiou, Anastassios C ^b   Rautkari, Lauri ^a   Arboleda, Julio C ^a   Rojas, Orlando J ^a  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84979913003     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep30695     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Siró, I. & Plackett, D. Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: A review. Cellulose 17, 459-494 (2010).
2. Lee, K.-Y., Aitomäki, Y., Berglund, L. A., Oksman, K. & Bismarck, A. On the use of nanocellulose as reinforcement in polymer matrix composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 105, 15-27 (2014).
3. Sehaqui, H. et al. Cellulose nanofiber orientation in nanopaper and nanocomposites by cold drawing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 4, 1043-1049 (2012).
4. Tang, H., Butchosa, N. & Zhou, Q. A transparent, hazy, and strong macroscopic ribbon of oriented cellulose nanofibrils bearing poly(ethylene glycol). Adv. Mater. 27, 2070-2076 (2015).
5. Pahimanolis, N. et al. Nanofibrillated cellulose/carboxymethyl cellulose composite with improved wet strength. Cellulose 20, 1459-1468 (2013).
6. Hooshmand, S., Aitomäki, Y., Norberg, N., Mathew, A. P. & Oksman, K. Dry-spun single-filament fibers comprising solely cellulose nanofibers from bioresidue. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 13022-13028 (2015).
7. Hakansson, K. M. O. et al. Hydrodynamic alignment and assembly of nanofibrils resulting in strong cellulose filaments. Nat. Commun. 5, 4018 (2014).
8. Iwamoto, S., Isogai, A. & Iwata, T. Structure and mechanical properties of wet-spun fibers made from natural cellulose nanofibers. Biomacromolecules 12, 831-836 (2011).
9. Mertaniemi, H. et al. Human stem cell decorated nanocellulose threads for biomedical applications. Biomaterials 82, 208-220 (2015).
10. Torres-rendon, J. G., Schacher, F. H., Ifuku, S. & Walther, A. Mechanical performance of macrofibers of cellulose and chitin nanofibrils aligned by wet-stretching: A critical comparison. Biomacromolecules 15, 2709-2717 (2014).
11. Walther, A., Timonen, J. V. I., Díez, I., Laukkanen, A. & Ikkala, O. Multifunctional high-performance biofibers based on wetextrusion of renewable native cellulose nanofibrils. Adv. Mater. 23, 2924-2928 (2011).
12. Moon, R. J., Martini, A., Nairn, J., Simonsen, J. & Youngblood, J. Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem. Soc. Rev. 40, 3941-3994 (2011).
13. Klemm, D. et al. Nanocelluloses: A new family of nature-based materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 5438-5466 (2011).
14. Giles, H. F. J., Wagner, J. R. J. & Mount, E. M. I. In Extrus.-Defin. Process. Guid. Handb. 188-193 (William Andrew Publishing/Plastics Design Library, 2005).
15. Dimic-Misic, K. et al. From colloidal spheres to nanofibrils: Extensional flow properties of mineral pigment and mixtures with micro and nanofibrils under progressive double layer suppression. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 446, 31-43 (2015).
16. Chronakis, I. S. & Alexandridis, P. Rheological properties of oppositely charged polyelectrolyte-surfactant mixtures: effect of polymer molecular weight and surfactant architecture. Macromolecules 34, 5005-5018 (2001).
17. Dufresne, A. Nanocellulose: A new ageless bionanomaterial. Mater. Today 16, 220-227 (2013).
18. Michud, A. et al. Ioncell-F: ionic liquid-based cellulosic textile fibers as an alternative to viscose and Lyocell. Text. Res. J. 86, 543-552 (2016).
19. Pönni, R., Rautkari, L., Hill, C. a S. & Vuorinen, T. Accessibility of hydroxyl groups in birch kraft pulps quantified by deuterium exchange in D2O vapor. Cellulose 21, 1217-1226 (2014).
20. Jayme, G. Micromeasurements of the swelling of pulps. Pap.-Wochenbl Pap. 6, 187-194 (1944).
21. Suchy, M., Kontturi, E. & Vuorinen, T. Impact of drying on wood ultrastructure: similarities in cell wall alteration between native wood and isolated wood-based fibers. Biomacromolecules 11, 2161-2168 (2010).
22. Kohler, R., Döck, R., Ausperger, B. & Alex, R. A numeric model for the kinetics of water vapor sorption on cellulosic reinforcement fibers. Compos. Interfaces 10, 255-276 (2003).
23. Haavisto, S. et al. Rheological characterization of microfibrillated cellulose suspension. Tappi J. 14, 291-302 (2015).
24. Conrad, J. C. & Lewis, J. A. Structure of colloidal gels during microchannel flow. Langmuir 24, 7628-7634 (2008).
25. Karppinen, A. et al. Flocculation of microfibrillated cellulose in shear flow. Cellulose 19, 1807-1819 (2012).
26. Saarikoski, E., Saarinen, T., Salmela, J. & Seppälä, J. Flocculated flow of microfibrillated cellulose water suspensions: An imaging approach for characterisation of rheological behaviour. Cellulose 19, 647-659 (2012).
27. Baker, J. L., Widmer-Cooper, A., Toney, M. F., Geissler, P. L. & Alivisatos, A. P. Device-scale perpendicular alignment of colloidal nanorods. Nano Lett. 10, 195-201 (2010).
28. Kerekes, R. J. Rheology of fibre suspensions in papermaking: An overview of recent research. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 21, 598-612 (2006).
29. Wang, Q., Zhu, J. Y. & Considine, J. M. Strong and optically transparent films prepared using cellulosic solid residue recovered from cellulose nanocrystals production waste stream. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 5, 2527-2534 (2013).
30. Philipse, A. P. The random contact equation and its implications for (colloidal) rods in packings, suspensions, and anisotropic powders. Langmuir 12, 5971-5971 (1996).
31. Giles, H. F. J., Wagner, J. R. J. & Mount, E. M. I. In Extrus.-Defin. Process. Guid. Handb. 497-503 (William Andrew Publishing/Plastics Design Library, 2005).
32. Frensemeier, M., Koplin, C., Jaeger, R., Kramer, F. & Klemm, D. Mechanical properties of bacterially synthesized nanocellulose hydrogels. Macromol. Symp. 294, 38-44 (2010).
33. Green, C. Dimensional properties of paper structures. Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev. 20, 151-158 (1981).
34. Lee, J. M., Pawlak, J. J. & Heitmann, J. A. Dimensional and hygroexpansive behaviors of cellulose microfibrils (MFs) from kraft pulpbased fibers as a function of relative humidity. Holzforschung 66, 1001-1008 (2012).
35. Rojo, E. et al. Comprehensive elucidation of the effect of residual lignin on the physical, barrier, mechanical and surface properties of nanocellulose films. Green Chem. 17, 1853-1866 (2015).
36. Baley, C. Analysis of the flax fibres tensile behaviour and analysis of the tensile stiffness increase. Compos.-Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 33, 939-948 (2002).
37. Kempinski, J. Determination of pressure loss during flow of viscoplastic mixtures in horizontal pipelines in the laminar flow zone. Electron. J. Polish Agric. Univ. 9, 36 (2006).