Tidal-Fluvial and Estuarine Processes in the Lower Columbia River: II. Water Level Models, Floodplain Wetland Inundation, and System Zones

Estuaries and Coasts

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 1299-1324

  Jay, David A ^a   Borde, Amy B ^b   Diefenderfer, Heida L ^b  

^a Portland State University   (United States)

^b PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Environmental flows; Estuarine processes; Hydropower impacts; Non stationary tides; Sum exceedance value; Tidal freshwater; Tidal river zonation; Tides; Water levels; Wetlands

Indexed keywords

ESTUARINE DYNAMICS; FLOODPLAIN; FLUVIAL PROCESS; FRESHWATER INPUT; HINDCASTING; HYDROELECTRIC POWER; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; HYDROLOGICAL REGIME; INTERTIDAL ENVIRONMENT; NUMERICAL METHOD; OCEAN TIDE; RIVER FLOW; WATER LEVEL; WETLAND; ZONATION;

BONNEVILLE DAM; COLUMBIA ESTUARY; COLUMBIA RIVER; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84979587857     PISSN: 15592723     EISSN: 15592731     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12237-016-0082-4     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Bakun, A. 1973. Coastal upwelling indices, west coast of North America, 1946–71. U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA Technical Report NMFS–SSRF–671, 103 p.
2. Baldwin, A.H., M.S. Egnotovich, and E. Clarke. 2001. Hydrologic change and vegetation of tidal freshwater marshes: field, greenhouse, and seed-bank experiments. Wetlands 21: 519–531.
3. Bonneville Power Administration. 2012. Assessing the Canadian Hydro Operation Post 2024 in the Absence of the Treaty, Portland, 94 pp.
4. Borde A.B., S.A. Zimmerman, R.M. Kaufmann, H.L. Diefenderfer, N.K. Sather, and R.M. Thom. 2011. Lower Columbia River and Estuary Restoration Reference Site Study: 2010 Final Report and Site Summaries. PNWD-4262, prepared for the Lower Columbia River Estuary Partnership and the Bonneville Power Administration by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Marine Sciences Laboratory, Sequim, WA.
5. Borde A.B., V.I. Cullinan, H.L. Diefenderfer, R.M. Thom, R.M. Kaufmann, J. Sagar, and C. Corbett. 2012a. Lower Columbia River and Estuary Ecosystem Restoration Program Reference Site Study: 2011 Restoration Analysis. PNNL-21433, prepared for the Lower Columbia River Estuary Partnership by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Marine Sciences Laboratory, Sequim, WA. Available URL: http://www.pnnl.gov/main/publications/external/technical_reports/PNNL-21433.pdf.
6. Borde A.B., R.M. Kaufmann, V.I. Cullinan, S.A. Zimmerman, and C.L. Wright. 2012b. Lower Columbia River and Estuary Habitat Monitoring 2011 Annual Report. PNNL-21128, prepared for the Lower Columbia River Estuary Partnership by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Marine Sciences Laboratory, Sequim, WA.
7. Bottom, D. L., C. A. Simenstad, J. Burke, A. M. Baptista, D. A. Jay, K. K. Jones, E. Casillas, and M. H. Schiewe. 2005. Salmon at river’s end: The role of the estuary in the decline and recovery of Columbia River salmon. U.S. Dept. of Commerce, NOAA Tech. Memo., NMFS-NWFSC-68, 246 pp.
8. Bromirski, P.D., A.J. Miller, R.E. Flick, and G. Auad. 2011. Dynamical suppression of sea level rise along the Pacific coast of North America: indications for imminent acceleration. Journal of Geophysical Research 116, C07005. doi:10.1029/2010JC006759.
9. Bunn, S., and A. Arthington. 2002. Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environmental Management 30: 492–507.
10. Buschman, F.A., A.J.F. Hoitink, M. van der Vegt, and P. Hoekstra. 2010. Subtidal flow division at a shallow tidal junction. Water Resources Research 46, W12515. doi:10.1029/2010WR009266.
11. Callaway, J.C., A.B. Borde, H.L. Diefenderfer, V.T. Parker, J.M. Rybczyk, and R.M. Thom. 2012. Pacific Coast tidal wetlands. In Wetland habitats of North America: ecology and conservation concerns, ed. D.P. Batzer and A.H. Baldwin, 103–116. Berkeley: University of California Press.
12. Castaing, P., and G.P. Allen. 1981. Mechanisms controlling seaward escape of suspended sediment from the Gironde: a macrotidal estuary in France. Marine Geology 40: 101–118.
13. Chawla, A., D.A. Jay, A.M. Baptista, M. Wilkin, and C. Seaton. 2008. Seasonal variability and estuary-shelf interactions in circulation dynamics of a river-dominated estuary. Estuaries and Coasts 31: 269–288.
14. Christy, J.A., and J.A. Putera. 1993. Lower Columbia River natural area inventory: 1992. Portland: Oregon Natural Heritage Program.
15. Cornu, C., and S. Sadro. 2002. Physical and functional responses to experimental marsh surface elevation manipulation in Coos Bay’s South Slough. Restoration Ecology 10: 474–486.
16. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service, FWS/OBS-79/31. Washington: Office of Biological Services.
17. Day, J.W., C.A.S. Hall, W. Micheal Kemp, and A. Yáñez-Arancibia. 1989. Estuarine ecology, 50. New York: Wiley.
18. Diefenderfer, H.L., R.M. Thom, G.E. Johnson, J.R. Skalski, K.A. Vogt, B.D. Ebberts, G.C. Roegner, and E.M. Dawley. 2011. A levels-of-evidence approach for assessing cumulative ecosystem response to estuary and river restoration programs. Ecological Restoration 29: 111–132.
19. Diefenderfer, H.L. G.E. Johnson, R.M. Thom, K.E. Buenau, L.A. Weitkamp, C.M. Woodley, A.B. Borde, and R.K. Kropp. 2016. Evidence-based evaluation of the cumulative effects of ecosystem restoration. Ecosphere 7(3): e01242. doi:10.1002/ecs2.1242.
20. Ewing, K. 1986. Plant growth and productivity along complex gradients in a Pacific Northwest brackish intertidal marsh. Estuaries 9: 49–62.
21. FGDC (Federal Geographic Data Committee). 2012. Coastal and marine ecological classification standard. FGDC-STD-018-2012. Marine and Coastal Spatial Data Subcommittee, June, 2012. Available URL: http://www.fgdc.gov/standards/projects/FGDC-standards-projects/cmecs-folder/CMECS_Version_06-2012_FINAL.pdf/view.
22. FGDC (Federal Geographic Data Committee). 2013. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. FGDC-STD-004-2013, 2nd edition. Wetlands Subcommittee, August 2013. Available URL: http://www.fgdc.gov/standards/projects/FGDC-standards-projects/wetlands/nvcs-2013.
23. Foreman, M.G.G., W.R. Crawford, and R.F. Marsden. 1995. De-tiding: Theory and practice. In Coastal and estuarine studies, vol. 47, ed. D.R. Lynch and A.M. Davies, 203–239.
24. Fox, D.S., S. Bell, W. Nehlsen, and J. Damron. 1984. The Columbia River Estuary: atlas of physical and biological characteristics. Astoria: Columbia River Estuary Data Development Program.
25. Gallo, Marcos, and Susana Vinzon. 2005. Generation of overtides and compound tides in Amazon estuary. Ocean Dynamics 55: 5–6.
26. Georgas, N., B. Wen, and Y. Zhao. 2013. Final report calculation of vertical tidal datums for the tidal Hudson River north of Yonkers, New York. Hoboken: Stevens Institute of Technology. 25 pp.
27. Geyer, W.R., J.T. Morris, F.G. Prahl, and D.A. Jay. 2000. Interaction between physical processes and ecosystem structure: a comparative approach. In Estuarine science: a synthetic approach to research and practice, ed. J.E. Hobbie, 177–206. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
28. Giese, B.S., and D.A. Jay. 1989. Modeling tidal energetics of the Columbia River Estuary. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 29: 549–571.
29. Godin, G. 1999. The propagation of tides up rivers with special considerations on the Upper Saint Lawrence River. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 48: 307–324.
30. Gowing, D.J., and G. Spoor. 1998. The effects of water table depth on the distribution of plant species on lowland wet grasslands. In United Kingdom floodplains, ed. R. Bailey, P. Jose, and B. Sherwood, 185–196. Otley: Westbury.
31. Guo, L., M. van der Wegen, D. A. Jay, P. Matte, Z. B. Wang, D. Roelvink, and Q. He. 2015. River-tide dynamics: Exploration of nonstationary and nonlinear tidal behavior in the Yangtze River estuary. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 120. doi:10.1002/2014JC010491.
32. Hamlet, A.F., M.M. Elsner, G.S. Mauger, S.-Y. Lee, I. Tohver, and R.A. Norheim. 2013. An overview of the Columbia Basin Climate Change Scenarios Project: approach, methods, and summary of key results. Atmosphere-Ocean 51(4): 392–415. doi:10.1080/07055900.2013.819555.
33. Hidayat, H., A.J.F. Hoitink, M.G. Sassi, and P.J.J.F. Torfs. 2014. Prediction of discharge in a tidal river using artificial neural networks. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 19(8): 04014006.
34. Horner-Devine, A.R., D.A. Jay, P.M. Orton, and E.Y. Spahn. 2009. A conceptual model of the strongly tidal Columbia River plume. Journal of Marine System 78: 460–475. doi:10.1016/j.jmarsys.2008.11.025.
35. Huber, P. J., 1996. Robust statistical procedures, 2nd Ed. No. 68 in CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics Society of Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
36. Hudon, C. 1997. Impact of water level fluctuations on St. Lawrence River aquatic vegetation. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 54: 2853–2865.
37. Jay, D.A. 1991. Green’s law revisited: tidal long wave propagation in channels with strong topography. Journal of Geophysical Research 96: 20,585–20,598.
38. Jay, D.A., and E.P. Flinchem. 1997. Interaction of fluctuating river flow with a barotropic tide: a test of wavelet tidal analysis methods. Journal of Geophysical Research 102: 5705–5720.
39. Jay, D.A., and P. Naik. 2011. Distinguishing human and climate influences on hydrological disturbance processes in the Columbia River USA. Hydrological Sciences Journal 56: 1186–1209.
40. Jay, D.A., and C.A. Simenstad. 1996. Downstream effects of water withdrawal in a small, high-gradient basin: erosion and deposition on the Skokomish River Delta. Estuaries 19: 501–517.
41. Jay, D.A., and J.D. Smith. 1990. Circulation, density distribution and neap-spring transitions in the Columbia River Estuary. Progress in Oceanography 25: 81–112.
42. Jay, D.A., B.S. Giese, and C.R. Sherwood. 1990. Energetics and sedimentary processes in the Columbia River Estuary. Progress in Oceanography 25: 157–174.
43. Jay, D.A., K. Leffler, and S. Degens. 2011. Long-term evolution of Columbia River tides. ASCE Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering 137: 182–191. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000082.
44. Jay, D.A., K. Leffler, H.L. Diefenderfer, and A.B. Borde. 2014. Tidal-fluvial and estuarine processes in the lower Columbia River, I. Along-channel water level variations, Pacific Ocean to Bonneville Dam. Estuaries and Coasts 38: 415–433.
45. Junk, W.J. 1999. The flood pulse concept of large rivers: learning from the tropics. Archiv für Hydrobiologie, Supplement 115: 261–280.
46. Kingsford, R.T. 2000. Ecological impacts of dams, water diversions and river management on floodplain wetlands in Australia. Austral Ecology 25: 109–127.
47. Kuchler, A.W. 1964. Manual to accompany the map potential natural vegetation of the conterminous United States. New York: American Geographical Society, Special Publication No. 36.
48. Kukulka, T., and D.A. Jay. 2003a. Impacts of Columbia River discharge on salmonid habitat I. a non-stationary fluvial tide model. Journal of Geophysical Research 108: 3293. doi:10.1029/2002JC001382.
49. Kukulka, T., and D.A. Jay. 2003b. Impacts of Columbia River discharge on salmonid habitat II. Changes in shallow-water habitat. Journal of Geophysical Research 108: 3294. doi:10.1029/2003JC001829.
50. Kunze, L.M. 1994. Preliminary classification of native, low elevation, freshwater wetland vegetation in Western Washington. Olympia: Washington State Department of Natural Resources.
51. Leffler, K., and D.A. Jay. 2009. Enhancing tidal harmonic analysis: Robust (hybrid L1/L2) solutions. Continental Shelf Research 29: 78–88.
52. Leyer, I. 2005. Predicting plant species’ responses to river regulation: the role of water level fluctuations. Journal of Applied Ecology 42: 239–250.
53. Longuet-Higgins, M.S. 1969. On the transport of mass by time-varying ocean currents. Deep Sea Research and Oceanographic Abstracts 16: 431–447.
54. Matte, P., Y. Secretan, and J. Morin. 2014. Temporal and spatial variability of tidal-fluvial dynamics in the St. Lawrence fluvial estuary: An application of nonstationary tidal harmonic analysis. Journal of Geophysical Research, Oceans 119: 5724–5744. doi:10.1002/2014JC009791.
55. Moffett, K.B., D.A. Robinson, and S.M. Gorelick. 2010. Relationship of salt marsh vegetation zonation to spatial patterns in soil moisture, salinity, and topography. Ecosystems 13: 1287–1302.
56. Naik, P., and D.A. Jay. 2011. Distinguishing human and climate influences on the Columbia River: changes in mean flow and sediment transport. Journal of Hydrology 404(3–4): 259–277.
57. National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). 2008. Biological Opinion – Consultation on Remand for Operation of the Federal Columbia River Power System, 11 Bureau of Reclamation Projects in the Columbia Basin and ESA Section 10(a)(1)(A) Permit for Juvenile Fish Transportation Program. NMFS (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Fisheries) – Northwest Region, Seattle, Washington.
58. National Research Council (NRC). 2012. Sea-level rise for the coasts of California, Oregon, and Washington: past, present, and future. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
59. Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS). 2002. Wetland determination (WETS) table for Clark County, Washington. Natural Resource Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. Available at http://www.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/ftpref/support/climate/wetlands/wa/53011.txt (May 2012).
60. O’Connor, J.E. 2004. The evolving landscape of the Columbia River Gorge-Lewis and Clark and cataclysms on the Columbia. Oregon Historical Quarterly 105: 390–421.
61. Odum, W.E. 1988. Comparative ecology of tidal freshwater and salt marshes. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 19: 147–176.
62. Opperman, J.J., G.E. Galloway, J. Fargione, J.F. Mount, B.D. Richter, and S. Secchi. 2009. Sustainable floodplains through large-scale reconnection to rivers. Science 326: 1487–1488.
63. Pawlowicz, R., R. Beardsley, and S. Lentz. 2002. Classical tidal harmonic analysis with errors in matlab using t-tide. Computers and Geosciences 28: 929–937.
64. Pennings, S.C., M.B. Grant, and M.D. Bertness. 2005. Plant zonation in low-latitude salt marshes: disentangling the roles of flooding, salinity and competition. Journal of Ecology 93: 159–167.
65. Peterson, M. 2003. A conceptual view of environment-habitat-production linkages in tidal river estuaries. Reviews in Fisheries Science 11: 291–313.
66. Picket, S.T.A., and P.S. White. 1985. The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. San Diego: Academic.
67. Poff, N.L., J.D. Allan, M.B. Bain, J.R. Karr, K.L. Prestergaard, B.D. Richter, R.E. Sparks, and J.C. Stromberg. 1997. The natural flow regime: a paradigm for river conservation and restoration. BioScience 47: 769–784.
68. Qian, Y., W.I. Gustasfson, L.R. Leung, and S.J. Ghan. 2009. Effects of soot-induced albedo change on snowpack and hydrological cycle in Western United States based on weather research forecasting chemistry and regional climate simulations. Journal of Geophysical Research 114, D03108. doi:10.1029/2008JD011039.
69. Rieman, B., J. Dunham, and J. Clayton. 2006. Emerging concepts for management of river ecosystems and challenges to applied integration of physical and biological sciences in the Pacific Northwest, USA. International Journal of River Basin Management 4: 85–97.
70. Roegner, G.C., H.L. Diefenderfer, A.B. Borde, R.M. Thom, E.M. Dawley, A.H. Whiting, S.A. Zimmerman, and G.E. Johnson. 2009. Protocols for monitoring habitat restoration projects in the lower Columbia River and estuary. U.S. Dept. Commer., NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-NWFSC-97, 63 pp.
71. Sagar, J.P., A. B. Borde, L.L. Johnson, T. Peterson, J. Needoba, C. A. Corbett, K. H. Macneale, M. Schwartz, A. Silva, V.I. Cullinan, S. A. Zimmerman, R. M. Thom, P.M. Chittaro, O. P. Olson, S. Y. Sol, D. J. Teel, and G. M. Ylitalo. 2014. Juvenile salmon ecology in tidal freshwater wetlands of the lower Columbia river and estuary: Synthesis of the ecosystem monitoring program, trends (2005–2013) and food web dynamics (2011–2013). Prepared by the Lower Columbia Estuary Partnership for the Bonneville Power Administration. Available from the Lower Columbia Estuary Partnership, Portland, OR.
72. Salathé Jr., E.P., A.F. Hamlet, C.F. Mass, S.-Y. Lee, M. Stumbaugh, and R. Steed. 2014. Estimates of twenty-first-century flood risk in the Pacific Northwest based on regional climate model simulations. Journal Hydrometeor 15(5): 1881–1899. doi:10.1175/JHM-D-13-0137.1.
73. Sassi, M.G., A.J.F. Hoitink, B. de Brye, B. Vermeulen, and E.C. Deleersnijder. 2011. Tidal impact on the division of river discharge over distributary channels in the Mahakam Delta. Ocean Dynamics 61: 2211–2228.
74. Sharpe, P.J., and A.H. Baldwin. 2009. Patterns of wetland plant species richness across estuarine gradients of Chesapeake Bay. Wetlands 29(1): 225–235.
75. Sharpe, P.J., and A.H. Baldwin. 2013. Wetland plant species richness across estuarine gradients: the role of environmental factors and the mid-domain effect. Aquatic Botany 107: 23–32.
76. Sherwood, C.R., D.A. Jay, R.B. Harvey, P. Hamilton, and C.A. Simenstad. 1990. Historical changes in the Columbia River estuary. Progress in Oceanography 25: 299–352.
77. Simenstad, C.A., J.L. Burke, J.E. O’Connor, C. Cannon, D.W. Heatwole, M.F. Ramirez, I.R. Waite, T.D. Counihan, and K.L. Jones. 2011. Columbia river estuary ecosystem classification—concept and application. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2011–1228, 60 p.
78. Templeton, W., and D.A. Jay. 2013. Lower Columbia River sand supply and removal: estimates of two sand budget components. ASCE Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal and Ocean Engineering. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000188.
79. Thomas, D.W. 1984. The vascular flora of the Columbia River Estuary. Wasmann Journal of Biology 42(1–2): 92–106.
80. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 2012. Columbia River Estuary Ecosystem Classification, Geomorphic Catena. Available at: http://water.usgs.gov/GIS/metadata/usgswrd/XML/creec_geomorphic_catena.xml.