Consensus group sessions: A useful method to reconcile stakeholders’ perspectives about network performance evaluation

International Journal of Integrated Care

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2010, Pages

  Lamontagne, Marie Eve ^a   Swaine, Bonnie R ^a   Lavoie, André ^b   Champagne, François ^a   Marcotte, Anne Claire ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b LAVAL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c Gouvernement du Quebec   (Canada)

Author keywords

Brain injury; Evaluation; Integrated health care delivery; Network; Performance

Indexed keywords

EID: 84979577444     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15684156     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5334/ijic.537     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Borgatti S. The network paradigm in organizational research: a review and typology. Journal of Management 2003;29(6): 991–1013.
2. Goodwin N, Perri, Peck E, Freeman T, Posaner R. Managing across diverse networks of care: lessons from other sectors. London: NCCSDO; 2004. [cited Nov 9 2010]. Available from: http://www.sdo.nihr.ac.uk/files/adhoc/39-policy-report.pdf.
3. Kenis P, Provan KG. Towards an exogenous theory of public network performance. Public Administration 2009;87(3):440– 56.
4. Waldfogel J. The new wave of service integration. The Social Service Review 1997;71(3):463–84.
5. Contandriopoulos A-P, Denis J-L, Touati N, Rodriguez R. Intégration des soins: dimensions et mise en oeuvre [Care integration: dimensions and practice]. Rupture: Revue Transdisciplinaire en Santé 2001;8(2):38–52. [in French].
6. Keast R, Brown K, Mandell M. Getting the right mix: unpacking integration meaning and strategies. International Public Management Journal 2007;10(1):9–33.
7. Keast R, Mandell MP, Brown K, Woolcock G. Network structures: working differently and changing expectations. Public Administration Review 2004;64(3):363–71.
8. Provan KG, Milward HB. A premilinary theory of interorganizational effectiveness: a comparative study of four community health systems. Administrative Science Quarterly 1995;40(1):1–33.
9. Fleury M-J. Integrated service networks: the Quebec case. Health Services Management Research 2006 Aug;19(3):153– 65.
10. Mandell M, Keast R. Evaluating network arrangement. Toward revised performance measure. Public Performance and Management Review 2007;30(4):574–97.
11. Mandell MP, Keast R. Evaluating the effectiveness of interorganisational relations through networks: developing a framework for revised performance measure. Public Management Review 2008;10(6):715–31.
12. Lamontagne ME, Swaine BR, Lavoie A, Champagne F, Marcotte AC. Perceptions of traumatic brain injury network participants about network performance. Brain Injury 2010;24(6):812–22.
13. Leggat S, Leatt P. Cadre d’évaluation du rendement des systèmes de prestation de services de santé intégrée [Peformance evaluation of integrated health systems]. Healthcare Management Forum 1997;10(1):19–26. [in French].
14. Huxham C. Theorizing collaboration practice. Public Management Review 2003;5(3):401–23.
15. Provan KG, Veazie MA, Staten LK, Tufel-Shone NI. The use of network analysis to strengthen community partnership. Public Administration Review 2005;65(5):603–13.
16. Huxham C, Vangen S. Managing to collaborate: the theory and practice of collaborative advantage. NewYork: Routledge; 2005.
17. Connolly T, Conlon EJ, Deutch SJ. Organizational effectiveness: a multiple-constituency approach. Academy of Management Review 1980;5(2):211–7.
18. Guisset A-L, Sicotte C, Leclercq P, D’Hoore W. Définition de la performance hospitalière: une enquiête auprès des divers acteurs stratégiques au sein des hôpitaux [Definition of hospital performance: unease in front of the diversity of strategic actors at the hospitals]. Sciences Sociales et Santé 2002;20(2):65–102. [in French].
19. Minvielle E, Sicotte C, Champagne F, Contandriopoulos AP, Jeantet M, Preaubert N, et al. Hospital performance: competing or shared values? Health Policy 2008;87(1):8–19.
20. Tregunno D, Ross Baker G, Barnsley J, Murray M. Competing values of emergency department performance: balancing multiple stakeholder perspectives. Health Services Research 2004;39(4 Pt 1):771–91.
21. Finucane PM, Barron SR, Davies HA, Hadfield-Jones RS, Kaigas TM. Towards an acceptance of performance assessment. Medical Education 2002;36(10):959–64.
22. Gagliardi A, Lemieux-Charles L, Brown A, Sullivan T, Goel V. Stakeholder preferences for cancer care performance indicators. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance 2008;21(2):175–89.
23. Sicotte C, Champagne F, Contandriopoulos AP, Barnsley J, Beland F, Leggat SG, et al. A conceptual framework for the analysis of health care organizations’ performance. Health Service Management Research 1998;11(1):24–41. discussion-8.
24. Leutz WN. Five laws for integrating medical and social services: lessons from the United States and the United Kingdom. The Milbank Quarterly 1999;77(1):77–110. iv–v.
25. Zinn J, Zalokowski A, Hunter L. Identifying indicators of laboratory management performance: a multiple constituency approach. Health Care Management Review 2001;26(1):40–53.
26. Dijk JAGMV. Delphi Questionnaires versus groups interviews. A comparison case. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 1990;(37):293–304.
27. Bryson JM, Crosby BC, Stone MM. The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review 2006;66(s1):44–55.
28. Gervais M, Pépin G. TRIAGE: a new group technique gaining recognition in evaluation. Evaluation Journal of Australasia 2002;2(2):45–9.
29. Swaine B, Dutil E, Demers L, Gervais M. Evaluating Clients’ perception of the quality of head in jury rehabilitation services: development and validation of a questionnaire. Brain Injury 2000;7:575–87.