Global production network mapping for transforming socio-ecological systems

Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability

Volumn 20, Issue , 2016, Pages 61-66

  Van Holt, Tracy ^a,b   Weisman, Wendy ^c  

^a ROYAL SWEDISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^b STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE   (Sweden)

^c Centre for Social Innovation   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CERTIFICATION; FISHING INDUSTRY; FOOD SUPPLY; GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; MAPPING METHOD; PERSISTENCE; SEAFOOD; SUSTAINABILITY;

EID: 84979515572     PISSN: 18773435     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2016.06.003     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. 1 FAO, The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture. 2014, Food and Agriculture Organization.
2. 2•• Bush, S.R., Oosterveer, P., Bailey, M., Mol, A.P.J., Sustainability governance of chains and networks: a review and future outlook. J Clean Prod 107 (2015), 8–19 Describes network typologies, their relevance to sustainability science, and areas of future research.
3. 3•• Coe, N.M., Dicken, P., Hess, M., Global production networks: realizing the potential. J Econ Geogr 8 (2008), 271–295 One of the first descriptions of global production networks.
4. 4• Micheli, F., De Leo, G., Shester, G.G., Martone, R.G., Lluch-Cota, S.E., Butner, C., Crowder, L.B., Fujita, R., Gelcich, S., Jain, M., et al. A system-wide approach to supporting improvements in seafood production practices and outcomes. Front Ecol Environ 12 (2014), 297–305 Review of many of the market-based tools that are used for sustainability and their limits.
5. 5 Gulbrandsen, L.H., The emergence and effectiveness of the Marine Stewardship Council. Mar Policy 33 (2009), 654–660.
6. 6 MSC: Net Benefits: The first ten years of MSC certified sustainable fisheries. 2009, www.msc.org, Accessed 26 May 2016.
7. 7• Sampson, G.S., Sanchirico, J.N., Roheim, C.A., Bush, S.R., Taylor, J.E., Allison, E.H., Anderson, J.L., Ban, N.C., Fujita, R., Secure sustainable seafood from developing countries. Science 348 (2015), 504–506 A perspectives piece with an analysis that shows FIPs from developing countries take longer to achieve success.
8. 8 Pérez-Ramírez, M., Phillips, B., Lluch-Belda, D., Lluch-Cota, S., Perspectives for implementing fisheries certification in developing countries. Mar Policy 36 (2012), 297–302.
9. 9•• Österblom, H., Jouffray, J.-B., Folke, C., Crona, B., Troell, M., Merrie, A., Rockström, J., Transnational corporations as “keystone actors” in marine ecosystems. PLoS One, 10, 2015, e0127533 Keystone actors are present in the seafood industry and they likely have a disproportionate influence on the structure and function of ecosystems. If they take action to improve seafood sustainability in their supply chains, this could have potentially a transformational effect on seafood sustainability.
10. 10• Jacquet, J.L., Pauly, D., The rise of seafood awareness campaigns in an era of collapsing fisheries [Internet]. Mar Policy 31 (2007), 308–313 Explains the major seafood awareness campaigns and issues such as traceability. They conclude that little evaluation has been done to test whether these approaches are effective.
11. 11• Helyar, S.J., Lloyd, H.A.D., de Bruyn, M., Leake, J., Bennett, N., Carvalho, G.R., Fish product mislabelling: failings of traceability in the production chain and implications for illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing [Internet]. PLoS One, 9, 2014, e98691 They used genetics to assess whether store labels correctly identified hake species in their packages. The 6% of samples that were mislabeled were usually cheaper species and represented potentially a high volume in the fishery.
12. 12 Marko, P.B., Nance, H.a., van den Hurk, P., Seafood substitutions obscure patterns of mercury contamination in Patagonian toothfish (Dissostichus eleginoides) or “Chilean sea bass” [Internet]. PLoS One, 9, 2014, e104140 Found that MSC certified Chilean sea bass varied in mercury levels, which indicates substitution from uncertified stocks and/or species that have higher levels of mercury.
13. 13 Hallstein, E., Villas-Boas, S.B., Can household consumers save the wild fish? Lessons from a sustainable seafood advisory [Internet]. J Environ Econ Manage 66 (2013), 52–71.
14. 14 Olson, J., Clay, P.M., Pinto da Silva, P., Putting the seafood in sustainable food systems. Mar Policy 43 (2014), 104–111.
15. 15 Purcell, S.W., Polidoro, B.a., Hamel, J.-F., Gamboa, R.U., Mercier, A., The cost of being valuable: predictors of extinction risk in marine invertebrates exploited as luxury seafood [Internet]. Proc Biol Sci, 281, 2014, 20133296.
16. 16 Pala, C., Ban on betuga caviar points to sturgeon's wortdwide decline. Am Assoc Adv Sci, 310, 2015, 37.
17. 17 Doukakis, P., Pikitch, E.K., Rothschild, A., DeSalle, R., Amato, G., Kolokotronis, S.-O., Testing the effectiveness of an international conservation agreement: marketplace forensics and CITES caviar trade regulation [Internet]. PLoS One, 7, 2012, e40907.
18. 18 Keskin, Ç., Ulman, A., Raykov, V., Daskalov, G.M., Zylich, K., Pauly, D., Zeller, D., Reconstruction of Fisheries Catches for Bulgaria: 1950–2010. Work. Pap. #20; Fish. Cent. 2015.
19. 19 Ludwig, A., Lieckfeldt, D., Jahrl, J., Mislabeled and counterfeit sturgeon caviar from Bulgaria and Romania [Internet]. J Appl Ichthyol 31 (2015), 587–591.
20. 20 Johnson, T.A., Iyengar, A., Phylogenetic evidence for a case of misleading rather than mislabeling in caviar in the United Kingdom [Internet]. J Forensic Sci 60 (2015), S248–S253.
21. 21 Jentoft, S., Chuenpagdee, R., Fisheries and coastal governance as a wicked problem. Mar Policy 33 (2009), 553–560.
22. 22•• Chuenpagdee, R., Interactive governance for marine conservation: an illustration. Bull Mar Sci 87 (2011), 197–211 Explanation of interactive governance in fisheries, where the governed also influence those governing.
23. 23•• Lubell, M., Collaborative partnerships in complex institutional systems. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 12 (2015), 41–47 Review of different approaches that need to be incorporated in collaborative partnerships research, which involves systems thinking.
24. 24•• Mol, A.P.J., Transparency and value chain sustainability. J Clean Prod 107 (2015), 154–161 Analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of transparency schemes for sustainability.
25. 25 Von Geibler, J., Market-based governance for sustainability in value chains: conditions for successful standard setting in the palm oil sector. J Clean Prod 56 (2013), 39–53.
26. 26•• Meadows, D., Leverage Points: Places to Intervene in a System. 1999, The Sustianability Institute One of the founding pieces that explains leverage points in system analysis for transformations.
27. 27 Espersen: Our seas, Our fish, Our food. Sustainability report, April 2013. Available at www.espersen.com, 2013.