AAC modeling intervention research review

Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 101-115

  Sennott, Samuel C ^a   Light, Janice C ^b   McNaughton, David ^b  

^a PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

AAC modeling; Aided language stimulation; Augmentative and alternative communication; Communication; Complex communication needs

Indexed keywords

CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MORPHOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SEMANTICS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

EID: 84978864159     PISSN: 15407969     EISSN: 21692408     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1540796916638822     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Adamson, L. (1995). Communication development during infancy. Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark.
2. Adamson, L., Bakeman, R., Deckner, D. F., & Romski, M. A. (2009). Joint engagement and the emergence of language in children with autism and Down syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39, 84-96. doi:10.1007/s10803-008-0601-7
3. Bates, E. (1976). Language and context: The acquisition of pragmatics. New York, NY: Academic Press.
4. Bavelier, D., Newport, E. L., & Supalla, T. (2003). Children need natural languages, signed or spoken. Cerebrum, 6(4), 19-32.
5. Beck, A. R., Stoner, J. B., & Dennis, M. L. (2009). An investigation of aided language stimulation: Does it increase AAC use with adults with developmental disabilities and complex communication needs? Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25, 42-54. doi:10.1080/07434610802131059
6. Beukelman, D., & Mirenda, P. (2013). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (4th ed.). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
7. Binger, C., Kent-Walsh, J., Berens, J., Del Campo, S., & Rivera, D. (2008). Teaching Latino parents to support the multi-symbol message productions of their children who require AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 323-338. doi:10.1080/07434610802130978
8. Binger, C., Kent-Walsh, J., Ewing, C., & Taylor, S. (2010). Teaching educational assistants to facilitate the multisymbol message productions of young students who require augmentative and alternative communication. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19, 108-120. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2009/09-0015)
9. Binger, C., & Light, J. (2007). The effect of aided AAC modeling on the expression of multi-symbol messages by preschoolers who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 30-43. doi:10.1080/07434610600807470
10. Binger, C., & Light, J. (2008). The morphology and syntax of individuals who use AAC: Research review and implications for effective practice. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 123-138. doi:10.1080/07434610701830587
11. Binger, C., Maguire-Marshall, M., & Kent-Walsh, J. (2011). Using aided AAC models, recasts, and contrastive targets to teach grammatical morphemes to children who use AAC. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54, 160-176. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0163)
12. Blockberger, S., & Sutton, A. (2003). Toward linguistic competence: Language experiences and knowledge of children with extremely limited speech. In J. Light, D. Beukelman, & J. Reichle (Eds.), Communicative competence for individuals who use AAC: From research to effective practice (pp. 63-106). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
13. Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14. Bruno, J., & Trembath, D. (2006). Use of aided language stimulation to improve syntactic performance during a weeklong intervention program. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 300-313. doi:10.1080/07434610600768318
15. Busk, P. L., & Serlin, R. C. (1992). Meta-analysis for single-case research. In T. R. Kratochwill & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Single-case research design and analysis: New directions for psychology and education (pp. 187-212). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. Cafiero, J. M. (2001). The effect of an augmentative communication intervention on the communication, behavior, and academic program of an adolescent with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 16, 179-189. doi:10.1177/108835760101600306
17. Calculator, S. (1997). Fostering early language acquisition and AAC use: Exploring reciprocal influences between children and their environments. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 149-157. doi:10.1080/07434 619712331277968
18. Dada, S., & Alant, E. (2009). The effect of aided language stimulation on vocabulary acquisition in children with little or no functional speech. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18, 50-64. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2008/07-0018)
19. Drager, K. D. R., Postal, V. J., Carrolus, L., Castellano, M., Gagliano, C., & Glynn, J. (2006). The effect of aided language modeling on symbol comprehension and production in 2 preschoolers with autism. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 5, 112-125. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2006/012)
20. Fey, M. (1986). Language intervention with young children. Boston, MA: College Hill Press.
21. Gallway, C., & Richards, B. J. (1994). Input and interaction in language acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22. Gerken, L. A. (2008). Language development. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing.
23. Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D., Coyne, M., Greenwood, C., & Innocenti, M. S. (2005). Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 149-164. doi:10.1177/001440290507100202
24. Goossens', C. (1989). Aided communication intervention before assessment: A case study of a child with cerebral palsy. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 14-26. doi:10.1080/07434618912331274926
25. Goossens', C., Crain, S., & Elder, P. (1992). Engineering the classroom environment for interactive symbolic communication: An emphasis on the developmental period 18 months to five years. Birmingham, AL: Southeast Augmentative Communication Conference Publications.
26. Harris, M. D., & Reichle, J. (2004). The impact of aided language stimulation on symbol comprehension and production in children with moderate cognitive disabilities. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13, 155-167. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2004/016)
27. Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
28. Higgins, J. P. T., & Green, S. (Eds.). (2011). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 (Updated, March 2011). London, England: The Cochrane Collaboration. Available from www.cochranehandbook.org
29. Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (1996). The origins of grammar: Evidence from early language comprehension. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
30. Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165-169. doi:10.1177/001440290507100203
31. Iacono, T. (2003). Pragmatic development in individuals with developmental disabilities who use AAC. In J. Light, D. Beukelman, & J. Reichle (Eds.), Communicative competence for individuals who use AAC: From research to effective practice (pp. 323-360). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
32. International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication. (2014). What is AAC? Retrieved from https://www.isaac-online.org/english/what-is-aac/
33. Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
34. Kent-Walsh, J., Binger, C., & Hasham, Z. (2010). Effects of parent instruction on the symbolic communication of children using augmentative and alternative communication during storybook reading. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19, 97-107. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2010/09-0014)
35. Kent-Walsh, J., Binger, C., & Malani, M. (2010). Teaching partners to support the communication skills of young children who use AAC: Lessons from the ImPAACT program. Early Childhood Services, 4, 155-170.
36. Kraat, A. W. (1985). Communication interaction between aided and natural speakers: A state of the art report. Madison, WI: Trace Center Reprint Service. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED287275
37. Light, J. (1997). "Let's go star fishing": Reflections on the contexts of language learning for children who use aided AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 158-171. doi:10.1080/07434619712331277978
38. Light, J. (2003). "Shattering the silence": The development of communicative competence by individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication. In J. Light, D. Beukelman, & J. Reichle (Eds.), Communicative competence for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication (pp. 3-38). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
39. Mervis, C. M., & Bertrand, J. (1994). Acquisition of the novel name-nameless category (N3C) principle. Child Development, 65, 1646-1662. doi:10.2307/1131285
40. Millar, D. C., Light, J. C., & Schlosser, R. W. (2006). The impact of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on the speech production of individuals with developmental disabilities: A research review. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 248-264. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2006/021)
41. Newport, E. L., & Supalla, T. (2000). Sign language research at the millennium. In K. Emmorey & H. Lane (Eds.), The signs of language revisited: An anthology in honor of Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima (pp. 103-114). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42. Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., & Davis, J. L. (2011). Effect size in single-case research: A review of nine non-overlap techniques. Behavior Modification, 35, 303-322. doi:10.1177/0145445511399147
43. Paul, R. (1997). Facilitating transitions in language development for children using AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 141-148. doi:10.1080/07434619712331277958
44. Paul, R. (2007). Language disorders from infancy through adolescence: Assessment and intervention (3rd ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby/Elsevier.
45. Romski, M. A., & Sevcik, R. A. (1996). Breaking the speech barrier: Language development through augmented means. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
46. Romski, M. A., Sevcik, R. A., Adamson, L. B., Cheslock, M., Smith, A., Barker, R. M., & Bakeman, R. (2010). Randomized comparison of augmented and nonaugmented language interventions for toddlers with developmental delays and their parents. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 350-364. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0156)
47. Romski, M. A., Sevcik, R. A., Robinson, B., & Bakeman, R. (1994). Adult-directed communications of youth with mental retardation using the system for augmenting language. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 37, 617-628. doi:10.1044/jshr.3703.617
48. Rosa-Lugo, L. I., & Kent-Walsh, J. (2008). Effects of parent instruction on communicative turns of Latino children using augmentative and alternative communication during storybook reading. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 30, 49-61. doi:10.1177/1525740108320353
49. Roseberry-McKibbin, C. (2007). Language disorders in children: A multi-cultural perspective. Boston, MA: Pearson.
50. Schlosser, R. (2003). The efficacy of augmentative and alternative communication: Toward evidence-based practice. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
51. Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1998). Synthesizing single subject research: Issues and applications. Behavior Modification, 22, 221-242. doi:10.1177/01454455980223001
52. Sennott, S., & Bowker, A. (2009). Autism, AAC, and Proloquo2Go. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 137-145. doi:10.1044/aac18.4.137
53. Siegel, E., & Cress, C. (2002). Overview of the emergence of early AAC behaviors: Progression from communicative to symbolic skills. In J. Reichle, D. Beukelman, & J. Light (Eds.), Exemplary practices for beginning communicators: Implications for AAC (pp. 25-57). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
54. Simeonsson, R., & Bailey, D. (1991). Evaluating programme impact: Levels of certainty. In D. Mitchell & R. Brown (Eds.), Early intervention studies for young children with special needs (pp. 280-296). London, England: Chapman & Hall.
55. Slavin, R. E. (1986). Best-evidence synthesis: An alternative to meta-analytic and traditional reviews. Educational Researcher, 15, 5-11. doi:10.3102/0013189X015009005
56. Smith, M., & Grove, N. (2003). Asymmetry in input and output for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication. In J. Light, D. Beukelman, & J. Reichle (Eds.), Communicative competence of individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication (pp. 163-195). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
57. Smith, N. L. (1981). The certainty of judgments in health evaluations. Evaluation and Program Planning, 4, 273-278. doi:10.1016/0149-7189(81)90028-8
58. Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
59. Wilkinson, K., Romski, M. A., & Sevcik, R. (1994). Emergence of visual-graphic symbol combinations by youth with moderate or severe mental retardation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 37, 883-889. doi:10.1044/jshr.3704.883