BiPPred: Combined sequence- and structure-based prediction of peptide binding to the Hsp70 chaperone BiP

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 84, Issue 10, 2016, Pages 1390-1407

  Schneider, Markus ^a   Rosam, Mathias ^a   Glaser, Manuel ^a   Patronov, Atanas ^a   Shah, Harpreet ^a   Back, Katrin Christiane ^a   Daake, Marina Angelika ^a   Buchner, Johannes ^a   Antes, Iris ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Hsp70 substrate specificity; MMGBSA calculations; MMPBSA calculations; peptide binding prediction; protein peptide docking

Indexed keywords

CHAPERONE; GLUCOSE REGULATED PROTEIN 78; HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN 70; CARRIER PROTEIN; FLUORESCENT DYE; HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN; ISOQUINOLINE DERIVATIVE; LUCIFER YELLOW; MOLECULAR CHAPERONE GRP78; PEPTIDE; PRE-B-LYMPHOCYTE GENE 1 PROTEIN, HUMAN; PROLACTIN-BINDING PROTEIN; PROTEIN BINDING; SURROGATE IMMUNOGLOBULIN LIGHT CHAIN; VASCULOTROPIN A; VEGFA PROTEIN, HUMAN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; BINDING SITE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FLUORESCENCE SPECTROSCOPY; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; MOLECULAR DOCKING; MOLECULAR MODEL; POSITION WEIGHT MATRIX; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN MICROARRAY; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETICS; HUMAN; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; SPECTROFLUOROMETRY; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; THERMODYNAMICS;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANISOTROPY; BINDING SITES; CARRIER PROTEINS; FLUORESCENT DYES; GENE EXPRESSION; HEAT-SHOCK PROTEINS; HUMANS; IMMUNOGLOBULIN LIGHT CHAINS, SURROGATE; ISOQUINOLINES; MOLECULAR DOCKING SIMULATION; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; PEPTIDES; PROTEIN ARRAY ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION DOMAINS AND MOTIFS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; SPECTROMETRY, FLUORESCENCE; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY, PROTEIN; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; THERMODYNAMICS; VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR A;

EID: 84978828538     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.25084     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Karlin S, Brocchieri L. Heat shock protein 70 family: multiple sequence comparisons, function, and evolution. J Mol Evol 1998;47:565–577.
2. Gething M-J, Blond-Elguindi S, Buchner J, Fourie A, Knarr G, Modrow S, Nanu L, Segal M, Sambrook J. Binding sites for Hsp70 molecular chaperones in natural proteins. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quantitative Biol 1995;60:417–428.
3. Bertelsen EB, Chang L, Gestwicki JE, Zuiderweg ER. Solution conformation of wild-type E. coli Hsp70 (DnaK) chaperone complexed with ADP and substrate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106:8471–8476.
4. Zhu X, Zhao X, Burkholder WF, Gragerov A, Ogata CM, Gottesman ME, Hendrickson WA. Structural analysis of substrate binding by the molecular chaperone DnaK. Science 1996;272:1606–1614.
5. Goloubinoff P, De Los Rios P. The mechanism of Hsp70 chaperones: (entropic) pulling the models together. Trends Biochem Sci 2007;32:372–380.
6. Swain JF, Dinler G, Sivendran R, Montgomery DL, Stotz M, Gierasch LM. Hsp70 chaperone ligands control domain association via an allosteric mechanism mediated by the interdomain linker. Mol Cell 2007;26:27–39.
7. Takeda S, McKay DB. Kinetics of peptide binding to the bovine 70 kDa heat shock cognate protein, a molecular chaperone. Biochemistry 1996;35:4636–4644.
8. Marcinowski M, Höller M, Feige MJ, Baerend D, Lamb DC, Buchner J. Substrate discrimination of the chaperone BiP by autonomous and cochaperone-regulated conformational transitions. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2011;18:150–158.
9. Gragerov A, Gottesman ME. Different peptide binding specificities of hsp70 family members. J Mol Biol 1994;241:133–135.
10. Hageman J, van Waarde MA, Zylicz A, Walerych D, Kampinga HH. The diverse members of the mammalian HSP70 machine show distinct chaperone-like activities. Biochem J 2011;435:127–142.
11. Wiech H, Buchner J, Zimmermann M, Zimmermann R, Jakob U. Hsc70, immunoglobulin heavy chain binding protein, and Hsp90 differ in their ability to stimulate transport of precursor proteins into mammalian microsomes. J Biol Chem 1993;268:7414–7421.
12. Flynn GC, Pohl J, Flocco MT, Rothman JE. Peptide-binding specificity of the molecular chaperone BiP. Nature 1991;353:726–730.
13. Rüdiger S, Buchberger A, Bukau B. Interaction of Hsp70 chaperones with substrates. Nat Struct Mol Biol 1997;4:342–349.
14. Marcinowski M, Rosam M, Seitz C, Elferich J, Behnke J, Bello C, Feige MJ, Becker CFW, Antes I, Buchner J. Conformational selection in substrate recognition by Hsp70 chaperones. J Mol Biol 2013;425:466–474.
15. Zahn M, Berthold N, Kieslich B, Knappe D, Hoffmann R, Strater N. Structural studies on the forward and reverse binding modes of peptides to the chaperone DnaK. J Mol Biol 2013;425:2463–2479.
16. Rudiger S, Mayer MP, Schneider-Mergener J, Bukau B. Modulation of substrate specificity of the DnaK chaperone by alteration of a hydrophobic arch. J Mol Biol 2000;304:245–251.
17. Knarr G, Modrow S, Todd A, Gething MJ, Buchner J. BiP-binding sequences in HIV gp160. Implications for the binding specificity of BiP. J Biol Chem 1999;274:29850–29857.
18. Rüdiger S, Germeroth L, Schneider-Mergener J, Bukau B. Substrate specificity of the DnaK chaperone determined by screening cellulose-bound peptide libraries. EMBO J 1997;16:1501–1507.
19. Munro S, Pelham HR. An Hsp70-like protein in the ER: identity with the 78 kd glucose-regulated protein and immunoglobulin heavy chain binding protein. Cell 1986;46:291–300.
20. Dudek J, Greiner M, Muller A, Hendershot LM, Kopsch K, Nastainczyk W, Zimmermann R. ERj1p has a basic role in protein biogenesis at the endoplasmic reticulum. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2005;12:1008–1014.
21. Kabani M, Kelley SS, Morrow MW, Montgomery DL, Sivendran R, Rose MD, Gierasch LM, Brodsky JL. Dependence of endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation on the peptide binding domain and concentration of BiP. Mol Biol Cell 2003;14:3437–3448.
22. Kassenbrock CK, Garcia PD, Walter P, Kelly RB. Heavy-chain binding protein recognizes aberrant polypeptides translocated in vitro. Nature 1988;333:90–93.
23. Alder NN, Shen Y, Brodsky JL, Hendershot LM, Johnson AE. The molecular mechanisms underlying BiP-mediated gating of the Sec61 translocon of the endoplasmic reticulum. J Cell Biol 2005;168:389–399.
24. Blond-Elguindi S, Cwirla SE, Dower WJ, Lipshutz RJ, Sprang SR, Sambrook JF, Gething M-JH. Affinity panning of a library of peptides displayed on bacteriophages reveals the binding specificity of BiP. Cell 1993;75:717–728.
25. Van Durme J, Maurer-Stroh S, Gallardo R, Wilkinson H, Rousseau F, Schymkowitz J. Accurate prediction of DnaK-peptide binding via homology modelling and experimental data. PLoS Computat Biol 2009;5:e1000475.
26. Knarr G, Gething M-J, Modrow S, Buchner J. BiP binding sequences in antibodies. J Biol Chem 1995;270:27589–27594.
27. Roomp K, Antes I, Lengauer T. Predicting MHC class I epitopes in large datasets. BMC Bioinform 2010;11:90.
28. John B, Sali A. Comparative protein structure modeling by iterative alignment, model building and model assessment. Nucleic Acids Res 2003;31:3982–3992.
29. Hartmann C, Antes I, Lengauer T. IRECS: a new algorithm for the selection of most probable ensembles of side-chain conformations in protein models. Protein Sci Publ Protein Soc 2007;16:1294–1307.
30. Hartmann C, Antes I, Lengauer T. Docking and scoring with alternative side-chain conformations. Proteins 2009;74:712–726.
31. Antes I. DynaDock: a new molecular dynamics-based algorithm for protein-peptide docking including receptor flexibility. Proteins 2010;78:1084–1104.
32. Jorgensen WL, Maxwell DS, TiradoRives J. Development and testing of the OPLS all-atom force field on conformational energetics and properties of organic liquids. J Am Chem Soc 1996;118:11225–11236.
33. Liebscher M, Roujeinikova A. Allosteric coupling between the lid and interdomain linker in DnaK revealed by inhibitor binding studies. J Bacteriol 2009;191:1456–1462.
34. Case DA, Babin V, Berryman JT, Betz RM, Cai Q, Cerutti DS, Cheatham TE, III, Darden TA, Duke RE, Gohlke H, Goetz AW, Gusarov S, Homeyer N, Janowski P, Kaus J, Kolossváry I, Kovalenko A, Lee TS, LeGrand S, Luchko T, Luo R, Madej B, Merz KM, Paesani F, Roe DR, Roitberg A, Sagui C, Salomon-Ferrer R, Seabra G, Simmerling CL, Smith W, Swails J, Walker RC, Wang J, Wolf RM, Wu X, Kollman PA. AMBER 14. University of California, San Francisco; 2014.
35. Kollman PA, Massova I, Reyes C, Kuhn B, Huo S, Chong L, Lee M, Lee T, Duan Y, Wang W, Donini O, Cieplak P, Srinivasan J, Case DA, Cheatham TE, III. Calculating structures and free energies of complex molecules: combining molecular mechanics and continuum models. Acc Chem Res 2000;33:889–897.
36. Srinivasan J, Cheatham TE, III, Cieplak P, Kollman PA, Case DA. Continuum solvent studies of the stability of DNA, RNA, and phosphoramidate−DNA helices. J Am Chem Soc 1998;120:9401–9409.
37. Chong LT, Duan Y, Wang L, Massova I, Kollman PA. Molecular dynamics and free-energy calculations applied to affinity maturation in antibody 48G7. Proc Natl Acad Sci US A 1999;96:14330–14335.
38. Bill R, Miller BR, III, McGee TD, Jr, Swails JM, Homeyer N, Gohlke H, Roitberg AE. MMPBSA.py: an efficient program for end-state free energy calculations. J Chem Theory Comput 2012;8:3314–3321.
39. Antes I, Siu SW, Lengauer T. DynaPred: a structure and sequence based method for the prediction of MHC class I binding peptide sequences and conformations. Bioinformatics 2006;22:e16–e24.
40. Salomon-Ferrer R, Götz AW, Poole D, Grand SL, Walker RC. Routine microsecond molecular dynamics simulations with AMBER on GPUs. 2. Explicit solvent particle mesh Ewald. J Chem Theory Comput 2013;9:3878–3888.
41. Sun H, Li Y, Tian S, Xu L, Hou T. Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 4. Accuracies of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methodologies evaluated by various simulation protocols using PDBbind data set. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2014;16:16719–16729.
42. Luo P, Baldwin RL. Interaction between water and polar groups of the helix backbone: An important determinant of helix propensities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96:4930–4935.