Simulating the 20 May 2013 Moore, Oklahoma tornado with a 100-metre grid-length NWP model

Atmospheric Science Letters

Volumn 17, Issue 8, 2016, Pages 453-461

  Hanley, Kirsty E ^a   Barrett, Andrew I ^a   Lean, Humphrey W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

100 metre grid length; tornado; Unified Model

Indexed keywords

NUMERICAL MODEL; PREDICTION; SUPERCELL; TORNADO; WEATHER FORECASTING;

OKLAHOMA [UNITED STATES]; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84978764246     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1530261X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asl.678     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Adlerman EJ, Droegemeier KK, Davies-Jones R. 1999. A numerical simulation of cyclic mesocyclogenesis. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 56: 2045–2069.
2. Agee E, Childs S. 2014. Adjustments in tornado counts, F-Scale intensity, and path width for assessing significant tornado destruction. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology 53: 1494–1505.
3. Atkins NT, Butler KM, Flynn KR, Wakimoto RM. 2014. An integrated damage, visual, and radar analysis of the 2013 Moore Oklahoma EF5 tornado. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 95: 1549–1561, doi: 10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00033.1.
4. Best MJ, Pryor M, Clark DB, Rooney GG, Essery RLH, Menard CB, Edwards JM, Hendry MA, Porson A, Gedney N, Mercado LM, Sitch S, Blyth E, Boucher O, Cox PM, Grimmond CSB, Harding RJ. 2011. The Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES), model description—part 1:energy and water fluxes. Geoscientific Model Development 4: 677–699.
5. Boutle IA, Eyre JEJ, Lock AP. 2014. Seamless stratocumulus simulation across the turbulent gray zone. Monthly Weather Review 142: 1556–1569, doi: 10.1175/MWR-D-13-00229.1.
6. Brooks HE. 2004. On the relationship of tornado path length and width to intensity. Weather and Forecasting 19: 310–319.
7. Brotzge J, Donner W. 2013. The tornado warning process: a review of current research, challenges, and opportunities. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 94: 1715–1733.
8. Bryan GH, Wyngaard JC, Fritsch JM. 2003. Resolution requirements for the simulation of deep convection. Monthly Weather Review 131: 2394–2416.
9. Clark AJ, Kain JS, Marsh PT, Correia J Jr, Xue M, Kong F. 2012. Forecasting tornado pathlengths using a three-dimensional object identification algorithm applied to convection-allowing forecasts. Weather and Forecasting 27: 1090–1113.
10. Clark AJ, Gao J, Marsh PT, Smith T, Kain JS, Correia J Jr, Xue M, Kong F. 2013. Forecasting tornado pathlengths using a three-dimensional object identification algorithm applied to convection-allowing forecasts. Weather and Forecasting 28: 387–407.
11. Clark A, Willington S, Suri D, Kain JS, Coniglio MC, Knopfmeier KH, Weiss SJ, Jirak IL, Lean HW, Roberts R, Weeks M, Dean AR, Melick CJ, Karstens CD, Marsh PT, Correia J Jr. 2014. Comparing the NSSL-WRF Model and Convection-allowing Versions of UKMET's Unified Model during the 2013 and 2014 NOAA/HWT Spring Forecasting Experiments. In 27th Conference on Severe Local Storms. American Meteorological Society: Madison, WI.
12. Dahl JML, Parker MD, Wicker LJ. 2014. Imported and storm-generated near-ground vertical vorticity in a simulated supercell. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 71: 3027–3051, doi: 10.1175/JAS-D-13-0123.1.
13. Davies T, Cullen MJP, Malcolm AJ, Mawson MH, Staniforth A, White AA, Wood N. 2005. A new dynamical core for the Met Office's global and regional modelling of the atmosphere. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 131: 1759–1782.
14. Davies-Jones RP, Brooks H. 1993. Mesocyclogenesis from a theoretical perspective. In The Tornado: Its Structure, Dynamics, Prediction and Hazards. Church C, Burgess D, Doswell C, Davies-Jones R (eds). American Geophysical Union Press; Washington, DC; 105–114.
15. Gregory D, Rowntree PR. 1990. A mass flux convection scheme with representation of cloud ensemble characteristics and stability dependent closure. Monthly Weather Review 118: 1483–1506.
16. Hanley KE, Plant RS, Stein THM, Hogan RJ, Nicol JC, Lean HW, Halliwell C, Clark PA. 2015. Mixing length controls on high resolution simulations of convective storms. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 141: 272–284, doi: 10.1002/qj.2356.
17. Kain JS, Weiss SJ, Bright DR, Baldwin ME, Levit JJ, Carbin GW, Schwartz CS, Weisman ML, Droegemeier K, Weber DB, Thomas KW. 2008. Some practical considerations regarding horizontal resolution in the first generation of operational convection-allowing NWP. Weather and Forecasting 23: 931–952.
18. Kain JS, Clark AJ, Coniglio MC, Knopfmeier KH, Karstens CD, Willington S, Weeks M, Roberts NM, Lean HW, Wilkinson JM, Gilchrist L, Hanley KE, North R, Suri D, Weiss SJ, Jirak IL. 2016. Collaborative efforts between the U.S. and U.K. to advance prediction of high impact weather. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, in preparation.
19. Kendon EJ, Roberts NM, Senior CA, Roberts MJ. 2012. Realism of rainfall in a very high resolution regional climate model. Journal of Climate 25: 5791–5806, doi: 10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00562.1.
20. Kosiba K, Wurman J, Richardson Y, Markowski P, Robinson P, Marquis J. 2013. Genesis of the Goshen County, Wyoming, tornado on 5 June 2009 during VORTEX2. Monthly Weather Review 141: 1157–1181.
21. Lean HW, Clark PA, Dixon M, Roberts NM, Fitch A, Forbes R, Halliwell C. 2008. Characteristics of high-resolution versions of the Met Office Unified Model for forecasting convection over the United Kingdom. Monthly Weather Review 136: 3408–3424, doi: 10.1175/2008MWR2332.1.
22. Lemon LR, Doswell CA. 1979. Severe thunderstorm evolution and mesocyclone structure as related to tornadogenesis. Monthly Weather Review 107: 1184–1197.
23. Lock AP, Brown AR, Bush MR, Martin GM, Smith RNB. 2000. A new boundary layer mixing scheme. Part I: scheme description and single-column model tests. Monthly Weather Review 128: 3187–3199.
24. Markowski PM, Richardson YP. 2009. Tornadogenesis: our current understanding, forecasting considerations, and questions to guide future research. Atmospheric Research 93: 3–10.
25. Markowski P, Richardson Y. 2014a. What we know and don't know about tornado formation. Physics Today 67: 26–31, doi: 10.1063/PT.3.2514.
26. Markowski PM, Richardson YP. 2014b. The influence of environmental low-level shear and cold pools on tornadogenesis: insights from idealized simulations. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 71: 243–275, doi: 10.1175/JAS-D-13-0159.1.
27. Markowski PM, Straka JM, Rasmussen EN. 2003. Tornadogenesis resulting from the transport of circulation by a downdraft: Idealized numerical simulations. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 60: 795–823.
28. Mashiko W, Niino H, Kato T. 2009. Numerical simulation of tornadogenesis in an outer-rainband minisupercell of Typhoon Shanshan on 17 September 2006. Monthly Weather Review 137: 4238–4260, doi: 10.1175/2009MWR2959.1.
29. Naylor J, Gilmore MS. 2014. Vorticity evolution leading to tornadogenesis and tornadogenesis failure in simulated supercells. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 71: 1201–1217.
30. Orf L, Wilhelmson R, Wicker L. 2014. Numerical simulation of a supercell with an embedded long-track EF5 tornado. Special Symposium on Severe Local Storms: The Current State of the Science and Understanding Impacts. American Meteorological Society, Atlanta, GA
31. Rotunno R, Klemp J. 1985. On the rotation and propagation of simulated supercell thunderstorms. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 42: 271–292.
32. Schenkman AD, Xue M, Hu M. 2014. Tornadogenesis in a high-resolution simulation of the 8 May 2003 Oklahoma City supercell. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 71: 130–154.
33. Schwartz CS, Kain JS, Weiss SJ, Xue M, Bright DR, Kong F, Thomas KW, Levit JJ, Coniglio MC. 2009. Next-day convection-allowing WRF model guidance: a second look at 2-km versus 4-km grid spacing. Monthly Weather Review 137: 3351–3372.
34. Stein THM, Hogan RJ, Hanley KE, Clark PA, Halliwell C, Lean HW, Nicol J, Plant RS. 2014. The three-dimensional microphysical structure of convective storms over the southern United Kingdom. Monthly Weather Review 142: 3264–3283, doi: 10.1175/MWR-D-13-00372.1.
35. Stensrud DJ, Wicker LJ, Xue M, Dawson II DT, Yussouf N, Wheatley DM, Thompson TE, Snook NA, Smith TM, Schenkman AD, Potvin CK, Mansell ER, Lei T, Kuhlman KM, Jung Y, Jones TA, Gao J, Coniglio MC, Brooks HE, Brewster KA. 2013. Progress and challenges with warn-on-forecast. Atmospheric Research 123: 2–16.
36. Vosper S, Carter E, Lean H, Lock A, Clark P, Webster S. 2013. High resolution modelling of valley cold pools. Atmospheric Science Letters 14: 193–199, doi: 10.1002/asl2.439.
37. Weisman ML, Davis C, Wang W, Manning KW, Klemp JB. 2008. Experiences with 0-36-h explicit convective forecasts with the WRF-ARW model. Weather and Forecasting 23: 407–437.
38. Wicker LJ, Wilhelmson RB. 1995. Simulation and analysis of tornado development and decay within a three-dimensional supercell thunderstorm. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 52: 2675–2703.
39. Wilson DR, Ballard SP. 1999. A microphysically based precipitation scheme for the UK Meteorological Office Unified Model. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 125: 1607–1636.
40. Wurman J, Dowell D, Richardson Y, Markowski P, Rasmussen E, Burgess D, Wicker L, Bluestein HB. 2012. The second verification of the origins of rotation in tornadoes experiment: VORTEX2. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 93: 1147–1170.
41. Zhang Y, Zhang F, Stensrud DJ, Meng Z. 2015. Practical predictability of the 20 May 2013 tornadic thunderstorm event in Oklahoma: sensitivity to synoptic timing and topographical influence. Monthly Weather Review 143: 2973–2997, doi: 10.1175/MWR-D-14-00394.1.