An fMRI and effective connectivity study investigating miss errors during advice utilization from human and machine agents

Social Neuroscience

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 2017, Pages 570-581

  Goodyear, Kimberly ^a   Parasuraman, Raja ^a   Chernyak, Sergey ^a   de Visser, Ewart ^a,b   Madhavan, Poornima ^c   Deshpande, Gopikrishna ^d,e   Krueger, Frank ^a  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Perceptronics Solutions Inc   (United States)

^c NATIONAL ACADEMIES OF SCIENCES   (United States)

^d AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

Author keywords

effective connectivity; errors; Expert advice; functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI); Granger causality

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRIVER; ERROR; EXPECTATION; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FUSIFORM GYRUS; HUMAN; LINGUAL GYRUS; MACHINE; MODULATION; RELIABILITY; SCREENING; X RAY; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; DECISION MAKING; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NERVE TRACT; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZATION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; YOUNG ADULT;

ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEURAL PATHWAYS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; RANDOM ALLOCATION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84978477110     PISSN: 17470919     EISSN: 17470927     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470919.2016.1205131     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Ashburner, J., & Friston, K. J., (2005). Unified segmentation. Neuroimage, 26(3), 839–851. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.018
2. Beckmann, M., Johansen-Berg, H., & Rushworth, M. F., (2009). Connectivity-based parcellation of human cingulate cortex and its relation to functional specialization. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(4), 1175–1190. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3328-08.2009
3. Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y., (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate:A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300.
4. Biele, G., Rieskamp, J., Krugel, L. K., & Heekeren, H. R., (2011). The neural basis of following advice. PLoS Biology, 9(6), e1001089. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001089
5. Boorman, E. D., O’Doherty, J. P., Adolphs, R., & Rangel, A., (2013). The behavioral and neural mechanisms underlying the tracking of expertise. Neuron, 80(6), 1558–1571. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.024
6. Botvinick, M. M., (2007). Conflict monitoring and decision making:Reconciling two perspectives on anterior cingulate function. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7(4), 356–366. doi:10.3758/CABN.7.4.356
7. Breznitz, S., (2013). Cry wolf:The psychology of false alarms. Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Büchel, C., Holmes, A. P., Rees, G., & Friston, K. J., (1998). Characterizing stimulus–response functions using nonlinear regressors in parametric fMRI experiments. Neuroimage, 8, 140–148. doi:10.1006/nimg.1998.0351
9. Chaminade, T., Rosset, D., Da Fonseca, D., Nazarian, B., Lutcher, E., Cheng, G., & Deruelle, C., (2012). How do we think machines think? An fMRI study of alleged competition with an artificial intelligence. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00103
10. Cooper, J. C., Kreps, T. A., Wiebe, T., Pirkl, T., & Knutson, B., (2010). When giving is good:Ventromedial prefrontal cortex activation for others’ intentions. Neuron, 67(3), 511–521. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.06.030
11. Costa, P., & McCrae, R., (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL:Psychological Assessment Resources.
12. Crottaz-Herbette, S., & Menon, V., (2006). Where and when the anterior cingulate cortex modulates attentional response:Combined fMRI and ERP evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(5), 766–780. doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.5.766
13. Davis, M. H., (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy:Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113
14. Delgado, M., Locke, H., Stenger, V., & Fiez, J., (2003). Dorsal striatum responses to reward and punishment:Effects of valence and magnitude manipulations. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 3(1), 27–38. doi:10.3758/CABN.3.1.27
15. Deshpande, G., & Hu, X., (2012). Investigating effective brain connectivity from fMRI data:Past findings and current issues with reference to Granger causality analysis. Brain Connectivity, 2(5), 235–245. doi:10.1089/brain.2012.0091
16. Deshpande, G., LaConte, S., James, G. A., Peltier, S., & Hu, X., (2009). Multivariate Granger causality analysis of fMRI data. Human Brain Mapping, 30(4), 1361–1373. doi:10.1002/hbm.v30:4
17. Deshpande, G., Sathian, K., & Hu, X., (2010). Effect of hemodynamic variability on Granger causality analysis of fMRI. Neuroimage, 52(3), 884–896. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.11.060
18. Dillon, D. G., Holmes, A. J., Jahn, A. L., Bogdan, R., Wald, L. L., & Pizzagalli, D. A., (2008). Dissociation of neural regions associated with anticipatory versus consummatory phases of incentive processing. Psychophysiology, 45(1), 36–49.
19. Dixon, S. R., Wickens, C. D., & McCarley, J. S., (2007). On the independence of compliance and reliance:Are automation false alarms worse than misses? Human Factors:The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 49(4), 564–572. doi:10.1518/001872007X215656
20. Dzindolet, M. T., Pierce, L. G., Beck, H. P., & Dawe, L. A., (2002). The perceived utility of human and automated aids in a visual detection task. Human Factors:The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 44(1), 79–94. doi:10.1518/0018720024494856
21. Engelmann, J. B., Capra, C. M., Noussair, C., & Berns, G. S., (2009). Expert financial advice neurobiologically “offloads” financial decision-making under risk. PLoS One, 4(3), e4957. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004957
22. Feng, C., Deshpande, G., Liu, C., Gu, R., Luo, Y.-J., & Krueger, F., (2016). Diffusion of responsibility attenuates altruistic punishment:A functional magnetic resonance imaging effective connectivity study. Human Brain Mapping, 37(2), 663–677.
23. Forman, S. D., Cohen, J. D., Fitzgerald, M., Eddy, W. F., Mintun, M. A., & Noll, D. C., (1995). Improved assessment of significant activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI):Use of a cluster-size threshold. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 33(5), 636–647. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1522-2594
24. Friston, K. J., Harrison, L., & Penny, W., (2003). Dynamic causal modelling. Neuroimage, 19(4), 1273–1302. doi:10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00202-7
25. Goebel, R., Esposito, F., & Formisano, E., (2006). Analysis of functional image analysis contest (FIAC) data with brainvoyager QX:From single-subject to cortically aligned group general linear model analysis and self-organizing group independent component analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 27(5), 392–401. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0193
26. Goodyear, K., Parasuraman, R., Chernyak, S., Madhavan, P., Deshpande, G., & Krueger, F., (2016). Advice taking from humans and machines:An fMRI and effective connectivity study. Manuscript submitted for publication.
27. Granger, C. W., (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica:Journal of the Econometric Society, 37, 424–438. doi:10.2307/1912791
28. Grant, M. M., White, D., Hadley, J., Hutcheson, N., Shelton, R., Sreenivasan, K., & Deshpande, G., (2014). Early life trauma and directional brain connectivity within major depression. Human Brain Mapping, 35(9), 4815–4826. doi:10.1002/hbm.22514
29. Grant, M. M., Wood, K., Sreenivasan, K., Wheelock, M., & White, D., (2015). Influence of early life stress on intra- and extra-amygdaloid causal connectivity. Neuropsychopharmacology, 40(7), 1782–1793.
30. Hampstead, B., Khoshnoodi, M., Yan, W., Deshpande, G., & Sathian, K., (2016). Patterns of effective connectivity during memory encoding and retrieval differ between patients with mild cognitive impairment and healthy older adults. Neuroimage, 124, 997–1008. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.002
31. Hampstead, B. M., Stringer, A. Y., Stilla, R. F., Deshpande, G., Hu, X., Moore, A. B., & Sathian, K., (2011). Activation and effective connectivity changes following explicit-memory training for face-name pairs in patients with mild cognitive impairment:A pilot study. Neurorehabilitation andNeural Repair, 25(3), 210–222. doi:10.1177/1545968310382424
32. Havlicek, M., Friston, K. J., Jan, J., Brazdil, M., & Calhoun, V. D., (2011). Dynamic modeling of neuronal responses in fMRI using cubature Kalman filtering. Neuroimage, 56(4), 2109–2128. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.03.005
33. Hutcheson, N. L., Sreenivasan, K. R., Deshpande, G., Reid, M. A., Hadley, J., White, D. M., … Lahti, A. C., (2015). Effective connectivity during episodic memory retrieval in schizophrenia participants before and after antipsychotic medication. Human Brain Mapping, 36(4), 1442–1457. doi:10.1002/hbm.v36.4
34. Krach, S., Hegel, F., Wrede, B., Sagerer, G., Binkofski, F., & Kircher, T., (2008). Can machines think? Interaction and perspective taking with robots investigated via fMRI. PLoS One, 3(7), e2597. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002597
35. Kriegeskorte, N., Simmons, W. K., Bellgowan, P. S. F., & Baker, C. I., (2009). Circular analysis in systems neuroscience:The dangers of double dipping. Nature Neuroscience, 12(5), 535–540. doi:10.1038/nn.2303
36. Krueger, F., Landgraf, S., van der Meer, E., Deshpande, G., & Hu, X., (2011). Effective connectivity of the multiplication network:A functional MRI and multivariate Granger causality mapping study. Human Brain Mapping, 32(9), 1419–1431. doi:10.1002/hbm.v32.9
37. Lacey, S., Stilla, R., Sreenivasan, K., Deshpande, G., & Sathian, K., (2014). Spatial imagery in haptic shape perception. Neuropsychologia, 60, 144–158. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.05.008
38. Lewandowsky, S., Mundy, M., & Tan, G., (2000). The dynamics of trust:Comparing humans to automation. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Applied, 6(2), 104.
39. Litt, A., Plassmann, H., Shiv, B., & Rangel, A., (2011). Dissociating valuation and saliency signals during decision-making. CerebralCortex, 21(1), 95–102. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhq065
40. Madhavan, P., & Gonzalez, C., (2006). Effects of sensitivity, criterion shifts, and subjective confidence on the development of automaticity in airline luggage screening. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. doi:10.1177/154193120605000326
41. Madhavan, P., & Wiegmann, D. A., (2007). Effects of information source, pedigree, and reliability on operator interaction with decision support systems. Human Factors:The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 49(5), 773–785. doi:10.1518/001872007X230154
42. McBride, S. E., Rogers, W. A., & Fisk, A. D., (2014). Understanding human management of automation errors. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 15(6), 545–577. doi:10.1080/1463922X.2013.817625
43. Merritt, S. M., Heimbaugh, H., LaChapell, J., & Lee, D., (2013). I trust it, but I don’t know why:effects of implicit attitudes toward automation on trust in an automated system. Human Factors:The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 55(3), 520–534. doi:10.1177/0018720812465081
44. Meshi, D., Biele, G., Korn, C. W., & Heekeren, H. R., (2012). How expert advice influences decision making. PLoS One, 7(11), e49748. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049748
45. Mesulam, M. M., (1998). From sensation to cognition. Brain, 121(6), 1013–1052. doi:10.1093/brain/121.6.1013
46. Onnasch, L., Ruff, S., & Manzey, D., (2014). Operators׳ adaptation to imperfect automation–Impact of miss-prone alarm systems on attention allocation and performance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 72(10–11), 772–782. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.05.001
47. Packard, M. G., & Knowlton, B. J., (2002). Learning and memory functions of the basal ganglia. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 25(1), 563–593. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.25.112701.142937
48. Parasuraman, A., (2000). Technology readiness index (Tri):A multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies. Journal of Service Research, 2(4), 307–320. doi:10.1177/109467050024001
49. Preusse, F., van der Meer, E., Deshpande, G., Krueger, F., & Wartenburger, I., (2011). Fluid intelligence allows flexible recruitment of the parieto-frontal network in analogical reasoning. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 22. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00022
50. Rice, S., & McCarley, J. S., (2011). Effects of response bias and judgment framing on operator use of an automated aid in a target detection task. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Applied, 17(4), 320–331.
51. Roebroeck, A., Formisano, E., & Goebel, R., (2005). Mapping directed influence over the brain using Granger causality and fMRI. Neuroimage, 25(1), 230–242. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.11.017
52. Schilbach, L., Eickhoff, S. B., Schultze, T., Mojzisch, A., & Vogeley, K., (2013). To you I am listening:Perceived competence of advisors influences judgment and decision-making via recruitment of the amygdala. Social Neuroscience, 8(3), 189–202. doi:10.1080/17470919.2013.775967
53. Singh, I. L., Molloy, R., & Parasuraman, R., (1997). Automation-induced “complacency”:Developement of the complancency-potential rating scale. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3(2), 111–122. doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap0302_2
54. Suen, V. Y. M., Brown, M. R. G., Morck, R. K., & Silverstone, P. H., (2014). Regional brain changes occurring during disobedience to “experts” in financial decision-making. PLoS One, 9(1), e87321. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0087321
55. Terasawa, Y., Fukushima, H., & Umeda, S., (2013). How does interoceptive awareness interact with the subjective experience of emotion? An fMRI study. Human Brain Mapping, 34(3), 598–612.
56. Van Swol, L. M., & Sniezek, J. A., (2005). Factors affecting the acceptance of expert advice. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44(3), 443–461. doi:10.1348/014466604X17092
57. Vickery, T. J., & Jiang, Y. V., (2009). Inferior parietal lobule supports decision making under uncertainty in humans. CerebralCortex, 19(4), 916–925. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn140
58. Wang, Y., & Quadflieg, S., (2015). In our own image? Emotional and neural processing differences when observing human-human vs human-robot interactions. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10, 1515–1524. doi:10.1093/scan/nsv043
59. Wheelock, M. D., Sreenivasan, K. R., Wood, K. H., Ver Hoef, L. W., Deshpande, G., & Knight, D. C., (2014). Threat-related learning relies on distinct dorsal prefrontal cortex network connectivity. Neuroimage, 102(Pt 2), 904–912. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.08.005
60. Xia, M., Wang, J., & He, Y., (2013). BrainNet viewer:A network visualization tool for human brain connectomics. PLoS One, 8(7), e68910. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0068910