Reappraising Stress Arousal Improves Performance and Reduces Evaluation Anxiety in Classroom Exam Situations

Social Psychological and Personality Science

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 579-587

  Jamieson, Jeremy P ^a   Peters, Brett J ^a   Greenwood, Emily J ^a   Altose, Aaron J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

^b Cuyahoga Community College   (United States)

Author keywords

developmental education; emotion regulation; reappraisal; test anxiety

Indexed keywords

EID: 84978289149     PISSN: 19485506     EISSN: 19485514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1948550616644656     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. D.M.Almeida (2005). Resilience and vulnerability to daily stressors assessed via diary methods. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 64–68.
2. M.H.Ashcraft (2002). Math anxiety: Personal, educational, and cognitive consequences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 181–185.
3. M.H.AshcraftE.P.Kirk (2001). The relationships among working memory, math anxiety, and performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 224–237.
4. L.F.Barrett (2006). Solving the emotion paradox: Categorization and the experience of emotion. Personality and social psychology review, 10, 20–46.
5. M.L.BeltzerM.K.NockB.J.PetersJ.P.Jamieson (2014). Rethinking butterflies: The affective, physiological, and performance effects of reappraising arousal during social evaluation. Emotion, 14, 761–768.
6. D.BerchM.M.M.Mazzocco (Eds.) (2007). Why is math hard for some children: The nature and origins of mathematics learning difficulties and disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
7. J.BlascovichW.B.Mendes (2010). Social psychophysiology and embodiment. In (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 194–227). New York, NY: John Wiley.
8. J.BlascovichW.B.MendesS.B.HunterK.Salomon (1999). Social “facilitation” as challenge and threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 68.
9. J.BlascovichW.B.MendesJ.TomakaK.SalomonM.Seery (2003). The robust nature of the biopsychosocial model challenge and threat: A reply to Wright and Kirby. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 234–243.
10. N.BolgerA.DavisE.Rafaeli (2003). Dairy methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 579–616.
11. H.R.Boylan (1999). Harvard Symposium on Developmental Education: Demographics, outcomes, and activities. Journal of Developmental Education, 23, 2–8.
12. R.T.BradleyR.McCratyM.AtkinsonD.TomasinoA.DaughertyL.Arguelles (2010). Emotion self-regulation, psychophysiological coherence, and test anxiety: Results from an experiment using electrophysiological measures. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 35, 261–283.
13. A.W.Brooks (2014) Get excited: Reappraising pre-performance anxiety as excitement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 1144–1158.
14. A.M.CohenF.B.Brawer (2003). The American community college. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
15. A.J.CrumP.SaloveyS.Achor (2013). Rethinking stress: The role of mindsets in determining the stress response. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 716.
16. S.S.DickersonM.E.Kemeny (2004). Acute stressors and cortisol responses: A theoretical integration and synthesis of laboratory research. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 355–391.
17. R.A.Dienstbier (1989). Arousal and physiological toughness: Implications for mental and physical health. Psychological Review, 96, 84–100.
18. B.Dubrovsky (1997). Natural steroids counteracting some actions of putative depressogenic steroids on the central nervous system: Potential therapeutic benefits. Medical Hypotheses, 49, 51–55.
19. Education Commission of the States. (2010). 2010 Annual report. Retrieved fromhttp://www.ecs.org/html/aboutecs/documents/AnnualReport2010.pdf
20. A.M.FergusonE.A.MaloneyJ.FugelsangE.F.Risko (2015). On the relation between math and spatial ability: The case of math anxiety. Learning and Individual Differences, 39, 1–12.
21. J.J.Gross (2015). The extended process model of emotion regulation: Elaborations, applications, and future directions. Psychological Inquiry, 26, 130–137.
22. D.R.HopkoR.MahadevanR.L.BareM.A.Hunt (2003). The Abbreviated Math Anxiety Scale (AMAS): Construction, validity, and reliability. Assessment, 10, 178–182.
23. M.IidaP.ShroutJ.LaurenceauN.Bolger (2012). Using diary methods in psychological research. In (Ed.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology: Foundations, planning, measures, and pyschometrics (Vol. 1, pp. 277–305). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
24. J.P.Jamieson (In press). Challenge and threat appraisals. In (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (2nd Edition): Theory and Application. Guilford Press.
25. J.P.JamiesonK.R.KoslovM.K.NockW.B.Mendes (2013). Experiences of discrimination increase risk taking. Psychological Science, 24, 131–139.
26. J.P.JamiesonW.B.MendesE.BlackstockT.Schmader (2010). Turning the knots in your stomach into bows: Reappraising arousal improves performance on the GRE. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 208–212.
27. J.P.JamiesonM.K.NockW.B.Mendes (2012). Mind over matter: Reappraising arousal improves cardiovascular and cognitive responses to stress. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 417–422.
28. J.P.JamiesonM.K.NockW.B.Mendes (2013a). Changing the conceptualization of stress in Social Anxiety Disorder: Affective and physiological consequences. Clinical Psychological Science, 1, 363–374.
29. J.P.JamiesonM.K.NockW.B.Mendes (2013b). Improving acute stress responses: The power of reappraisal. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 51–56.
30. N.A.John-HendersonM.L.RheinschmidtR.Mendoza-Denton (2015). Cytokine responses and math performance: The role of stereotype threat and anxiety reappraisals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 56, 203–206.
31. I.M.LyonsS.L.Beilock (2012). When math hurts: Math anxiety predicts pain network activation in anticipation of doing math. PloS One, 7, e48076.
32. X.Ma (1999). A meta-analysis of the relationship between anxiety toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, 520–541.
33. W.B.MendesJ.BlascovichS.B.HunterB.LickelJ.T.Jost (2007). Threatened by the unexpected: physiological responses during social interactions with expectancy-violating partners. Journal of personality and social psychology, 92, 698.
34. W.B.MendesH.M.GrayR.Mendoza-DentonB.MajorE.S.Epel (2007). Why egalitarianism might be good for your health: Physiological thriving during stressful intergroup encounters. Psychological Science, 18, 991–998.
35. W.B.MendesJ.P.Jamieson (2011). Embodied stereotype threat: Exploring brain and body mechanisms underlying performance impairments. In (Eds.), Stereotype threat: Theory, process, and application (pp. 51–68). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
36. F.Pajares (1996) Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543–578.
37. B.J.PetersN.C.OverallJ.P.Jamieson (2014). Physiological and cognitive consequences of suppressing and expressing emotion in dyadic interactions. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 94, 100–107.
38. K.J.PreacherA.F.Hayes (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717–731.
39. G.RamirezS.L.Beilock (2011). Writing about testing worries boosts exam performance in the classroom. Science, 331, 211–213.
40. M.D.Seery (2011). Challenge or threat? Cardiovascular indexes of resilience and vulnerability to potential stress in humans. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35, 1603–1610.
41. D.S.YeagerC.S.Dweck (2012). Mindsets that promote resilience: When students believe that personal characteristics can be developed. Educational Psychologist, 47, 1–13.
42. D.S.YeagerG.Walton (2011). Social-psychological interventions in education: They’re not magic. Review of Educational Research, 81, 267–301.
43. B.J.Zimmerman (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82–91.