At-home computer-aided myoelectric training system for wrist prosthesis

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 9775, Issue , 2016, Pages 284-293

  Vilouras, Anastasios ^a   Heidari, Hadi ^a   Navaraj, William Taube ^a   Dahiya, Ravinder ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Computer aided; Control prosthesis; SEMG; Training system

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; MYOELECTRICALLY CONTROLLED PROSTHETICS; OPEN SYSTEMS; PROSTHETICS; REAL TIME CONTROL; VIRTUAL REALITY; WEB SERVICES;

ANIMATION MODELING; COMPUTER AIDED; COMPUTER AIDED TRAININGS; INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENT; OPEN SOURCES; REHABILITATION AND RESTORATION; SEMG; TRAINING SYSTEMS;

COMPUTER CONTROL SYSTEMS;

EID: 84978251005     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-42324-1_28     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Sherman, E.D.: A Russian bioelectric-controlled prosthesis: report of a research team from the Rehabilitation Institute of Montreal. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 91(24), 1268 (1964)
2. Navaraj, W.T., et al.: Upper limb prosthetic control using toe gesture sensors. In: IEEE SENSORS Conference Proceedings, pp. 1-4 (2015)
3. Kuiken, T.A., et al.: Targeted reinnervation for enhanced prosthetic arm function in a woman with a proximal amputation: a case study. Lancet 369, 371-380 (2007)
4. Pasquina, P.F., et al.: First-in-man demonstration of a fully implanted myoelectric sensors system to control an advanced electromechanical prosthetic hand. J. Neurosci. Methods 244, 85-93 (2015)
5. Pylatiuk, C., Schulz, S., Döderlein, L.: Results of an Internet survey of myoelectric prosthetic hand users. Prosthet. Orthot. Int. 31(4), 362-370 (2007)
6. Carey, S.L., Dubey, R.V., Bauer, G.S., Highsmith, M.J.: Kinematic comparison of myoelectric and body powered prostheses while performing common activities. Prosthet. Orthot. Int. 33(2), 179-186 (2009)
7. Simon, A.M., Stern, K., Hargrove, L.J.: A comparison of proportional control methods for pattern recognition control. In: International Conference of the IEEE EMBS (2011)
8. Corbett, E.A., Perreault, E.J., Kuiken, T.A.: Comparison of electromyography and force as interfaces for prosthetic control. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 48(6), 629 (2011)
9. Lock, B.A., et al.: Prosthesis-guided training for practical use of pattern recognition control of prostheses. In: Myoelectric Symposium (2011)
10. Simon, A.M., Lock, B.A., Stubblefield, K.A., Hargrove, L.J.: Prosthesis-guided training increases functional wear time and improves tolerance to malfunctioning inputs of pattern recognition-controlled prostheses. In: Myoelectric Symposium (2011)
11. DiCicco, M., Lucas, L., Matsuoka, Y.: Comparison of control strategies for an EMG controlled orthotic exoskeleton for the hand. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 2, pp. 1622-1627 (2004)
12. Nielsen, J.L., et al.: Simultaneous and proportional force estimation for multifunction myoelectric prostheses using mirrored bilateral training. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 58(3), 681-688 (2011)
13. Davoodi, R., Loeb, G.E.: Real-time animation software for customized training to use motor prosthetic systems. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 20(2), 134-142 (2012)
14. Antonio, B.M.J., Roberto, M.G.: Virtual system for training and evaluation of candidates to use a myoelectric prosthesis. In: 2011 Pan American Health Care Exchanges (PAHCE), pp. 225-230 (2011)
15. Barraza-Madrigal, J.A., Ramírez-García, A., Muñoz-Guerrero, R.: A virtual upper limb prosthesis as a training system. In: Electrical Engineering Computing Science and Automatic Control (CCE), pp. 210-215 (2010)
16. Blana, D., et al.: Feasibility of using combined EMG and kinematic signals for prosthesis control: a simulation study using a virtual reality environment. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. (2015)
17. Andrew, J.T.: Transhumeral and elbow disarticulation anatomically contoured socket considerations. JPO: J. Prosthet. Orthot. 20(3), 107-117 (2008)
18. Ballas, M.T., Ballas, G.J., Epoch Medical Innovations, Inc.: Adaptive compression prosthetic socket system and method, U.S. Patent 20,160,000,583 (2016)
19. Hurley, G.R., Williams, J.R., Lim Innovations, Inc.: Modular prosthetic sockets and methods for making same, U.S. Patent 20,160,000,587 (2016)
20. Erik Scheme, P., Kevin Englehart, P.: Electromyogram pattern recognition for control of powered upper-limb prostheses: state of the art and challenges for clinical use. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 48(6), 643 (2011)
21. Lapatki, B.G., et al.: A thin, flexible multielectrode grid for high-density surface EMG. J. Appl. Physiol. 96(1), 327-336 (2004)
22. Kim, D.H., et al.: Epidermal electronics. Science 333(6044), 838-843 (2011)
23. Dahiya, R.S., et al.: Directions toward effective utilization of tactile skin: a review. IEEE Sens. J. 13(11), 4121-4138 (2013)
24. Dahiya, R.S., et al.: Towards tactile sensing system on chip for robotic applications. IEEE Sens. J. 11(12), 3216-3226 (2011)
25. Dahiya, R.S., et al.: Tactile sensing chips with POSFET array and integrated interface electronics. IEEE Sens. J. 14(10), 3448-3457 (2014)
26. Yogeswaran, N., Dang, W., Navaraj, W.T., Shakthivel, D., Khan, S., Polat, E.O., Gupta, S., Heidari, H., Kaboli, M., Lorenzelli, L., Cheng, G., Dahiya, R.: New materials and advances in making electronic skin for interactive robots. Adv. Robot. 29(21), 1359-1373 (2015)
27. Heidari, H., Bonizzoni, E., Gatti, U., Maloberti, F.: A CMOS current-mode magnetic hall sensor with integrated front-end. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I Regul. Pap. 62(5), 1270-1278 (2015)
28. Taylor, C.L., Schwarz, R.J.: The anatomy and mechanics of the human hand. Artif. Limbs 2 (2), 22-35 (1955)
29. Napier, J.R.: The prehensile movements of the human hand. Bone Joint J. 38(4), 902-913 (1956)