The study of building integration into the surrounding rural landscape: Focus on implementation of a Web-based MC-SDSS and its validation by two-way participation

Land Use Policy

Volumn 57, Issue , 2016, Pages 719-729

  Jeong, Jin Su ^a   García Moruno, Lorenzo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXTREMADURA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Building suitability; MCDA order; Participatory DMs; Perception analysis; Two way participation; Web MC SDSS

Indexed keywords

BUILDING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; GIS; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; PERCEPTION; RURAL LANDSCAPE; SPATIAL PLANNING;

SPAIN;

EID: 84978200206     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.07.005     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Andrienko, N., Andrienko, G., Intelligent support for geographic data analysis and decision making in the web. J. Geogr. Inf. Decis. Anal. 5:2 (2001), 115–128.
2. Batty, M., Dodge, M., Jiang, B., Smith, A., GIS and Urban Design (Working Paper, No. 3). 1998, Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, University College London, London.
3. Calvo, P., Hernández, T., Lozano, M., González-Gómez, D., Microencapsulation of extra-virgin olive oil by spray-drying: influence of wall material and olive quality. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 112 (2010), 852–858.
4. Carver, S., Developing Web-based GIS/MCE: improving access to data and spatial decision support tools. Thill, J.C., (eds.) Spatial Multicriteria Decision Making and Analysis, 1999, Ashgate, Aldershot, England, 49–75.
5. Chakhar, S., Mousseau, V., Multicriteria spatial decision support systems. Shekhar, S., Xiong, H., (eds.) Encyclopedia of GIS, 2008, Springer, 753–758.
6. Council of the European Union, Council resolution on architectural quality in urban and rural environments (2001/C 73/04). Off. J. Eur. Communities, 2001 (C73, 6/3/2001).
7. De Vriesa, S., de Grootb, M., Boersb, J., Eyesores in sight: quantifying the impact of man-made elements on the scenic beauty of Dutch landscapes. Landscape Urban Plann. 105 (2012), 118–127.
8. Di Fazio, S., La progettazione dell'edilizia rurale nei suoi rapporti con il paesaggio (The design of rural buildings in its dealings with the landscape). Rivista di Ingegneria Agraria 10 (1988), 379–385.
9. Dias, L., Mousseau, V., Figueira, J., Clímaco, J., An aggregation/disaggregation approach to obtain robust conclusions with ELECTRE TRI. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 138 (2002), 332–348.
10. Domingo-Santos, J.M., Fernández de Villarán, R., Rapp-Arrarás, I., Corral-Pazos de Provens, E., The visual exposure in forest and rural landscapes: an algorithm and a GIS tool. Landscape Urban Plann. 101:1 (2011), 52–58.
11. ® 9.3 Geocoding Technology. 2009 https://www.esri.com/library/whitepapers/pdfs/arcgis93-geocoding-technology.pdf (accessed 16.05.2016).
12. Eagen, W., Ngwenyama, O., Prescod, F., The design Charette in the classroom as a method for outcomes-based action learning in IS design. Inf. Syst. Educ. J. 6:19 (2008), 1–11.
13. Eastman, J.R., IDRISI Kilimanjaro: Guide to GIS and Image Processing. 2003, Clark Laboratories Clark University, Worcester.
14. Fountas, S., Wulfsohn, D., Blackmore, B.S., Jacobsen, H.L., Pederson, S.M., A model of decision-making and information flows for information-intensive agriculture. Agric. Syst. 87 (2006), 192–210.
15. García-Moruno, L., Hernández-Blanco, J., Ayuga, F., Analysis of the exterior colour of agroindustrial buildings: a computer aided approach to landscape integration. J. Environ. Manage. 69:1 (2003), 93–104.
16. Goodchild, M.F., Geographical information science. Int. J. Geog. Inf. Syst. 6:1 (1992), 31–45.
17. Hair, J.F. Jr., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., Multivariate Data Analysis. sixth ed., 2006, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
18. Hamilton, A., Trodd, N., Zhang, X., Fernando, T., Watson, K., Learning through visual systems to enhance the urban planning process. Environ. Plan. B: Plan. Des. 28:6 (2001), 833–845.
19. Jankowski, P., Nyerges, T., Smith, A., Moore, T.J., Horvath, E., Spatial group choice: a SDSS tool for collaborative spatial decision-making. Int. J. Geog. Inf. Syst. 11:6 (1997), 577–602.
20. Jaraíz, F.J., Mora, J., Gutiérrez, J.A., Jeong, J.S., Comparison of regional planning strategies: countywide general plans in USA and territorial plans in Spain. Land Use Policy 30:1 (2013), 758–773.
21. Jeong, J.S., García-Moruno, L., Hernández-Blanco, J., Integrating buildings into a rural landscape using a multi-criteria spatial decision analysis in GIS-enabled web environment. Biosyst. Eng. 112 (2012), 82–92.
22. Jeong, J.S., García-Moruno, L., Hernández-Blanco, J., A site planning approach for rural buildings into a landscape using a spatial multi-criteria decision analysis methodology. Land Use Policy 32 (2013), 108–118.
23. Jeong, J.S., García-Moruno, L., Hernández-Blanco, J., Jaraíz-Cabanillas, F.J., An operational method to supporting siting decisions for sustainable rural second home planning in ecotourism sites. Land Use Policy 41 (2014), 550–560.
24. Jeong, J.S., Montero-Parejo, M.J., García-Moruno, L., Hernández-Blanco, J., The visual evaluation of rural areas: a methodological approach for the spatial planning and color design of scattered second homes with an example in Hervás Western Spain. Land Use Policy 46 (2015), 330–340.
25. Kangas, J., Store, R., Internet and teledemocracy in participatory planning of natural resources management. Landscape Urban Plann. 62 (2003), 89–101.
26. Keefer, D.L., Kirkwood, C.W., Corner, J.L., Perspective on decision analysis applications 1990–2001. Decis. Anal. 1 (2004), 4–22.
27. Kingston, R., Carver, S., Evans, A., Turton, I., Web-based public participation geographical information systems: an aid to local environmental decision-making. Computers. Environ. Urban Syst. 24 (2000), 109–125.
28. LESOTEX, Guía Práctica De Aplicación De La Ley 15/2001 Del Suelo Y Ordenación Territorial De Extremadura (Practical Guide of the Law 15/2001 Application of the Soil and Land in Extremadura). 2001 http://sitex.juntaex.es/sias/Documentacion/guia practica.pdf (accessed 26.01.15).
29. Leader and Proder, Las Políticas Europeas LEADER Y PRODER En Extremadura (España): El Desarrollo Rural En Extremadura: Las Políticas Europeas Y El Impacto De Los Programas LEADER Y PRODER (European Policies LEADER and PRODER in Extremadura (Spain): the Rural Development in Extremadura: European Policies and the Impact of LEADER and PRODER Program). 2011, Editorial Académica Española, Mérida, Spain.
30. Malczewski, J., GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis. 1999, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
31. Malczewski, J., Review article GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis: a survey of the literature. Int. J. Geog. Inf. Sci. 20:7 (2006), 703–726.
32. Mennella, V., Qualita Dell Ambiente E Sviluppo Delle Aree Rurali (Quality Ofthe Environment and the Development of Rural Areas). 1997, Genio Rurale, Edagricole, Perugia.
33. Montes, R., Sánchez, A.M., Villar, P., Herera, F., A web tool to support decision making in the housing market using hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Appl. Soft Comput. 35 (2015), 949–957.
34. Polanyi, M., The Tacit Dimension. 1996, Doubleday Broadway Publishing Group, New York.
35. Ruiz, M.C., Fernández, I., Environmental assessment in construction using a spatial decision support system. Autom. Constr. 18:8 (2009), 1135–1143.
36. Saary, M.J., Radar plots: a useful way for presenting multivariate health care data. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 60 (2008), 311–317.
37. Saaty, T.L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process. 1996, McGraw-Hill, New York.
38. Schmitt, H., Landschaftbezogenes bauen in baden-wüttemberg (Landscape-related buildings in baden-wüttemberg). Landtechnik 2 (2003), 88–89.
39. Sharifi, M.A., Retsios, V., Site selection for waste disposal through spatial multiple criteria decision analysis. J. Telecommun. Inf. Technol. 3 (2004), 1–11.
40. Silva, S., Alçada-Almeida, L., Dias, L.C., Development of a web-based multi-criteria spatial decision support system for the assessment of environmental sustainability of dairy farms. Comput. Electron. Agric. 108 (2014), 46–57.
41. Simão, A., Densham, P.J., Haklay, M., Web-based GIS for collaborative planning and public participation: an application to the strategic planning of wind farm sites. J. Environ. Manage. 90:6 (2009), 2027–2040.
42. Smardon, R.C., Prototype Visual Assessment Manual. 1979, State University of New York, Syracuse.
43. Smith, E.L., Bishop, I.D., Williams, K.J., Ford, R.M., Scenario Chooser: an interactive approach to eliciting public landscape preferences. Landscape Urban Plann. 106:3 (2012), 230–243.
44. Tassinari, P., Torreggiani, D., Location planning: a methodological approach for agro-industrial buildings in rural territory. Trans. ASAE 49:2 (2006), 505–516.
45. Tassinari, P., Torreggiani, D., Paolinelli, G., Benni, S., Rural buildings and their integration in landscape management. Agric. Eng. Int: CIGR Ejournal, 2007 (9, Manuscript LW 07 020).
46. Tassinari, P., Torreggiani, D., Benni, S., Dealing with agriculture, environment and landscape in spatial planning: a discussion about the Italian case study. Land Use Policy 30:1 (2013), 739–747.
47. Umar, A., Object-oriented Client/Server Internet Environments. 1997, Prentice Hall Press, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
48. Voss, A., Denisovich, I., Gatalsky, P., Gavouchidis, K., Klotz, A., Roeder, S., Voss, H., Evolution of a participatory GIS computers. Environ. Urban Syst. 28:6 (2004), 635–636.
49. Webb, M., Gibson, D., Forkosh-Baruch, A., Challenges for information technology supporting educational assessment. J. Comput. Assisted Learn. 29 (2013), 451–462.
50. Yoon, K., Hwang, C.L., Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction. 1995, Sage Publications Inc., London, UK.