Comparison of regional planning strategies: Countywide general plans in USA and territorial plans in Spain

Land Use Policy

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 758-773

  Jaraíz Cabanillas, Francisco Javier ^a   Mora Aliseda, Julián ^a   Gutiérrez Gallego, José Antonio ^a   Jeong, Jin Su ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXTREMADURA   (Spain)

Author keywords

General plan; Land use; Regional development; Territorial plan; Transport

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ECONOMIC GROWTH; EMPLOYMENT; IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS; INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING; LAND USE PLANNING; QUALITY OF LIFE; REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT; REGIONAL PLANNING; RURAL AREA; RURAL DEVELOPMENT; SOCIOECONOMIC IMPACT; SUSTAINABILITY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TERRITORIAL PLANNING; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING;

CALIFORNIA; EXTREMADURA; SPAIN; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84862755861     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Balabanian O. Problemas agricolas e reformas agrarias no Alto Alentejo e na Estremadura Espanhola. Landscape and Urban Planning 2000 [1984], 50:95-106.
2. Bor W., Van Den, et al. Rethinking rural human resource management: the impact of globalisation and rural restructuring on rural education and training in western Europe. Journal of Rural Studies 2003 [1997], 19:327-344.
3. Berliner H. A plague on the land. Environment and Planning A 2004 [1970], 36:1529-1547.
4. Brenner N. Decoding the newest metropolitan regionalism in the U.S.: a critical overview. Political Geography 2006 [2000], 25:482-505.
5. Bryant R. Power, knowledge and political ecology in the third world: a review. Environment and Planning A 2004 [1998], 36:1529-1547.
6. Cloke P.J. Country backwater to virtual village? Rural studies and the cultural turn. Journal of Rural Studies 2003 [1997], 19:327-344.
7. Danson M.W., et al. Regional governance, institutional change, and regional development. Regional Studies 2009 [2000], 6:863-876.
8. Duane T. Shaping the Sierra: nature, culture, and conflict in the changing west. Environment and Planning A 2004 [1999], 36:1529-1547.
9. Dühr S. Spatial policies for regional sustainable development: a comparison of graphic and textual representations in regional plans in England and Germany. Regional Studies 2009 [2005], 6:863-876.
10. Farquhar F. History of the Sierra Nevada. Environment and Planning A 2004 [1965], 36:1529-1547.
11. Flyn A., Marsden T. Guest editorial: rural change, regulation and sustainability. Journal of Rural Studies 2003 [1995], 19:327-344.
12. Fulton W. Guide to California Planning. Environment and Planning A 2004 [1999], 36:1529-1547.
13. Gibbs D. Regional development agencies and sustainable development. Regional Studies 2009, 6:863-876.
14. Hettne B. The new regionalism revisited. Theories of New Regionalism 2003, 22-42. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. F. Söderbaum, T.M. Shaw (Eds.).
15. Hillier J. Paradise proclaimed? Towards a theoretical understanding of representations of nature in land-use planning decision-making. Environment and Planning A 2004 [1998], 36:1529-1547.
16. Huigen P.P.P. Do rural areas lose their differentiation?. Journal of Rural Studies 2003 [1996], 19:327-344.
17. Hulse D., Ribe R. Land conversion and the production of wealth. Environment and Planning A 2004 [2000], 36:1529-1547.
18. Hurley P.T., Walker P.A. Whose vision? Conspiracy theory and land-use planning in Nevada County, California. Environment and Planning A 2004, 36:1529-1547.
19. Joffre R., et al. Les systeemes agro-silvopastoraux mediterraneens: enjeux et reaexions pour une gestion raisonee. Landscape and Urban Planning 2000 [1991], 50:95-106.
20. Jonas A.E.G., Pincetl S. Rescaling regions in the state: the New Regionalism in California. Political Geography 2006, 25:482-505.
21. Keating M. The invention of regions: political restructuring and territorial government in western Europe. Political Geography 2006 [1997], 25:482-505.
22. Law 15/2001, of December 14th, of Land Use and Territorial Planning of Extremadura.
23. Lovering J. Theory led by policy? The inadequacies of the New Regionalism in economic geography illustrated from the case of Wales. Political Geography 2006 [1999], 25:482-505.
24. Lowe P., et al. Regulating the new rural spaces: the uneven development of land. Journal of Rural Studies 2003 [1993], 19:327-344.
25. Macfarlane R. Implementing agri-environment policy: a landscape ecology perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning 2000 [1998], 50:95-106.
26. Macleod D. The New Regionalism reconsidered: globalization, regulation and the recasting of political economic space. Political Geography 2006 [2001], 25:482-505.
27. McCann E.J. Where do you draw the line? Landscape, texts, and the politics of planning. Environment and Planning A 2004 [1997], 36:1529-1547.
28. Molotch H. The political economy of growth machines. Urban Affairs Review 1996 [1993], 31.
29. Nevada County Nevada County General Plan 1995, Sacramento.
30. Neumann R. Imposing wilderness: struggles over livelihood and nature preservation in Africa. Environment and Planning A 2004 [1998], 36:1529-1547.
31. Pincetl S. The regional management of growth in California: a history of failure. Political Geography 2006 [1994], 25:482-505.
32. Pinto-Correia T. Future development in Portuguese rural areas: how to manage agricultural support for landscape conservation?. Landscape and Urban Planning 2000, 50:95-106.
33. Preuss I., Vemuri A.W. Smart growth and dynamic modelling: implications for quality of life in Montgomery County, Maryland. Ecological Modelling 2004, 171:415-432.
34. Ravetz J. Evaluation of regional sustainable development-mapping the landscape. Regional Studies 2009 [2004], 6:863-876.
35. Rescia A.J., et al. Reformulation the social-ecological system in a cultural rural mountain landscape in the Picos de Europa region (northern Spain). Landscape and Urban Planning 2008, 88:23-33.
36. Robbins P. Authority and environment: institutional landscapes in Rajasthan, India. Environment and Planning A 2004 [1998], 36:1529-1547.
37. Rosentraub M.S., Helmke P. Location theory, a growth coalition, and a regimen in the development of a medium-sized city. Urban Affairs Review 1996, 31.
38. Saving, S.C., Greenwood, G.B., 2002. The potential impacts of development on wildlands in El Dorado County, California. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR 184.
39. Savitch H.V., Vogel R.K. Metropolitan consolidation versus metropolitan governance in Louisville. Regional Studies 2009 [2000], 6:863-876.
40. Schroeder R. Shady practices: agroforestry and gender politics in The Gambia. Environment and Planning A 2004 [1999], 36:1529-1547.
41. SEDD Nevada County economic and fiscal indicator review report. Environment and Planning A 2004 [2001], 36:1529-1547.
42. Skocpol T. Civic transformation and inequality in the contemporary United States. Political Geography 2006 [2004], 25:482-505.
43. SNEP People and resources. Environment and Planning A 2004 [1996], 36:1529-1547.
44. Stone C.N. Regime politics: governing Atlanta 1946-1988. Urban Affairs Review 1996 [1989], 31.
45. Terluin I.J. Differences in economic development in rural regional of advanced countries: an overview and critical analysis of theories. Journal of Rural Studies 2003, 19:327-344.
46. The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commision, 1993. General Plan Refinement of the Goal and Objectives for Montgomery County. Maryland.
47. USBC Quick facts. Environment and Planning A 2004 [2003], 36:1529-1547.
48. Walker P., Fortmann L. Whose landscape? A political ecology of the 'exurban' Sierra. Cultural Geographies 2003, 10:469-491.
49. Wallis A. The New Regionalism 2002, http://www.munimall.net/eos/2002/wallis_regionalism.nclk.
50. Wascher D., et al. Establishing targets to assess agricultural impacts on European landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 2000 [1999], 50:95-106.
51. Whatmore S., Boucher S. Bargaining with nature: the discourse and practice of environmental gain. Environment and Planning A 2004 [1993], 36:1529-1547.
52. Wheeler S. Regions, megaregions, and sustainability. Regional Studies 2009, 6:863-876.