Smart citizens for smart cities: Participating in the future

Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Energy

Volumn 169, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 93-101

  Bull, Richard ^a   Azennoud, Marouane ^b  

^a DE MONTFORT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b Children and Young People's Service   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Energy; Public private partnerships; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; DECISION MAKING; GLOBAL WARMING; PLANNING; SMART CITY;

CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS; CARBON REDUCTION; CITIZEN ENGAGEMENTS; CRITICAL QUESTIONS; DIGITAL ECONOMY; ENERGY; INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES; PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS; REDUCTION TARGETS; USER ENGAGEMENT;

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84978193726     PISSN: 17514223     EISSN: 17514231     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1680/jener.15.00030     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Arnstein S (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35: 216-244.
2. Bickerstaff K and Walker G (2005) Shared visions, unholy alliances: power, governance and deliberative processes in local transport planning. Urban Studies 42(12): 2123-2144.
3. BIS (Department for Business, Innovation, and Skills) (2013) Smart Cities: Background Paper. BIS, London, UK. See https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment-data/file/246019/bis-13-1209- smart-cities-background-paper-digital.pdf (accessed 27/04/2015).
4. Brown N, Bull R, Farhuk F and Ekwevugbe, T (2012) Novel instrumentation for monitoring after-hours electricity consumption of electrical equipment, and some potential savings from a switch-off campaign. Energy and Buildings 47: 74-83.
5. Bull R, Petts J and Evans J (2008) Social learning from public engagement: dreaming the impossible? Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 51(5): 701-716.
6. Bull R, Petts J and Evans J (2010) The importance of context for effective public engagement. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 53(8): 991-1009.
7. Cisco (2014) Cisco Smart + Connected Communities: Envisioning the Future of Cities Now. Cisco Systems, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA. See http://www.cisco.com/web/strategy/docs/smart-cities-expo-barcelona.pdf (accessed 14/03/2015).
8. Davoudi S and Evans N (2005) The challenge of governance in regional waste planning. Environment and Planning C 23(4): 493-517.
9. De Jong M, Joss S, Schraven D, Zhan C and Weijnen M (2015) Sustainable-smart-resilient-low carbon-eco-knowledge cities; making sense of a multitude of concepts promoting sustainable urbanization. Journal of Cleaner Production 109: 25-38.
10. EC (European Commission) (2013) European Innovation Partnership on Smart Cities and Communities: Strategic Implementation Plan. EC, Brussels, Belgium. See http://ec.europa.eu/eip/smartcities/files/sip-final-en.pdf (accessed 16/03/2015).
11. Fiorino DJ (1990) Citizen participation and environmental risk: a survey of institutional mechanisms. Science, Technology and Human Values 15(2): 226-243.
12. Forester J (1985) The policy analysis - critical theory affair: Wildavsky and Habermas as bedfellows? In Critical Theory and Public Life (Forester J (ed.)). MIT, London, UK, pp. 258-280.
13. Habermas J (1979). Communication and the Evolution of Society, translated by Thomas McCarthy. Beacon Press, Boston, MA, USA. Harrison C and Donnelly IA (2011) A theory of smart. Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the ISSS, Hull, UK, pp. 1-15. See http://journals.isss.org/index.php/proceedings55th/article/viewFile/1703/572 (accessed 01/03/2015).
14. Huber A and Mayer I (2015) Is this a smart city ? Narratives of city smartness and their critical assessment. Proceedings of the 2015 ECEE Summer Study Conference, Club Belambra Les Criques, Presqu'île de Giens Toulon/Hyères, France, pp. 817-823.
15. Janda K (2011) Building's don't use energy: people do. Architectural Science Review 54(1): 15-22.
16. Leach M, Scoones I and Stirling A (2010) Dynamic Sustainabilities: Technology, Environment and Social Justice. Earthscan, London, UK.
17. Mezirow J (1994) Understanding transformation theory. Adult Education Quarterly 44(4): 222-232.
18. Mezirow J (2003) Transformative learning as discourse. Journal of Transformative Education 1(1): 58-63.
19. Paroutis S, Bennett MM and Heracleous L (2014) A strategic view on smart city technology: the case if IBM smarter cities during a recession. Technological Forecasting and Strategic Change 89: 262-272.
20. Petts J (1995) Waste management strategy development: a case study of community involvement and consensus-building in Hampshire. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 38(4): 519-536.
21. Petts J (2006) Managing public engagement to optimize learning: reflections from urban river restoration. Human Ecology Review 13(2): 172-181.
22. Renn O (1992) Risk communication: towards a rational discourse with the public. Journal of Hazardous Materials 29(3): 465-519.
23. Slater R, Frederickson J, Thomas C, Wield D and Potter S (2007). A critical evaluation of partnerships in municipal waste management in England. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 51(3): 643-664.
24. SMART2020 (2008) Enabling the Low Carbon Economy in the Information Age. SMART2020, The Climate Group, London, UK. See http://www.smart2020.org/-assets/files/02-Smart2020Report.pdf (accessed 10/09/2015).
25. Sovacool B (2014) What are we doing here? Analyzing fifteen years of energy scholarship and proposing a social science research agenda. Energy Research and Social Science 1: 1-29.
26. UNEP (United Nations Environmental Programme) (2015) Cities and Buildings. UNEP-DTIE Sustainable Consumption and Production Branch, Paris, France. See http://www.unep.org/SBCI/pdfs/Cities-and-Buildings-UNEP-DTIE-Initiatives- and-projects-hd.pdf (accessed 01/10/2015).
27. Webler T (1995) 'Right' discourse in citizen participation: an evaluative yardstick. In Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse (Renn O, Webler T and Wiedemann P (eds)). Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, UK, pp. 35-86.
28. Webler T, Kastenholz H and Renn O (1995) Public participation in impact assessment: a social learning perspective. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 15(5): 443-463.