Social learning from public engagement: Dreaming the impossible?

Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

Volumn 51, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 701-716

  Bull, Richard ^a   Petts, Judith ^a   Evans, James ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Deliberation; Environmental citizenship; Public engagement; Social learning; Waste management

Indexed keywords

CITIZENSHIP; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; LEARNING; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; SOCIAL PARTICIPATION; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

ENGLAND; EURASIA; EUROPE; HAMPSHIRE; UNITED KINGDOM; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 50349084929     PISSN: 09640568     EISSN: 13600559     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09640560802208140     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Bandura, A. (1977) Social learning theory, Prentice Hall, London
2. Bandura, A. and Walters, R. H. (1969) Social learning and personality development, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, London
3. Barber, B. (1984) Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA
4. Bell, D. (2005) Liberal environmental citizenship. Environmental politics, 14:2, pp. 179-194.
5. Berglund, C. and Matti, S. (2006) Citizen and consumer: The dual role of individuals in environmental policy. Environmental politics, 15:4, pp. 550-571.
6. Blake, J. (1999) Overcoming the 'value-action gap' in environmental policy: Tensions between national policy and local experience. Local environment, 4:3, pp. 257-278.
7. Burgess, J. and Chilvers, J. (2006) "Upping the ante": A conceptual framework for designing and evaluating participatory technology assessments. Science and public policy, 33:10, pp. 713-728.
8. Burgess, J., Harrison, C. M. and Filius, P. (1998) Environmental communication and the cultural politics of environmental citizenship. Environment and planning A, 30, pp. 1445-1460.
9. Daniels, S. E. and Walker, G. (1996) Collaborative learning: Improving public deliberation in ecosytem-based management. Environmental impact assessment review, 16, pp. 71-102.
10. Davoudi, S. (2006) The evidence-policy interface in strategic waste planning for urban environments: The 'technical' and 'social' dimensions. Environment and planning C, 24:5, pp. 681-700.
11. Dobson, A. (2003) Citizenship and the environment, University Press, Oxford
12. Dobson, A. and Bell, D. (2006) Introduction. Environmental citizenship, MIT Press, London
13. Dryzek, J. S. (2000) Deliberative democracy and beyond, University Press, Oxford
14. Ekins, J. (1993) The energy from waste proposal in Portsmouth: A case history, Hampshire County Council
15. Fiorino, D. J. (1990) Citizen participation and environmental risk: A survey of institutional mechanisms. Science, technology and human values, 15:2, pp. 226-243.
16. Forester, J. (1999) The deliberative practitioner: Encouraging participatory planning processes, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
17. Gilg, A. and Barr, S. (2005) Encouraging 'environmental action' by exhortation: Evidence from a study in Devon. Journal of environmental planning and management, 48:4, pp. 593-618.
18. Gladwell, M. (2000) The tipping point, Abacus, London
19. HCC (2007) Hampshire natural resources initiative
20. Healey, P. (1992) Planning through debate: The communicative turn in planning theory. Town planning review, 63, pp. 143-162.
21. HWS (1999) Energy recovery facility contact group: Terms of reference, Hampshire Waste Services
22. Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated learning, University Press, Cambridge
23. Lisney, R. (2003) Project Integra: A personal history by Robert Lisney
24. Luque, E. (2005) Researching environmental citizenship and its publics. Environmental politics, 14:2, pp. 211-255.
25. Mason, J. (2004) Qualitative researching, Sage, London
26. Mezirow, J. (1994) Understanding transformation theory. Adult education quarterly, 44:4, pp. 222-232.
27. Mezirow, J. (2003) Transformative learning as discourse. Journal of transformative education, 1:1, pp. 58-63.
28. Nonaka, I. (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization science, 5:1, pp. 14-37.
29. Owens, S. (2000) Engaging the public: Information and deliberation in environmental policy. Environment and planning A, 32, pp. 1141-1148.
30. Petts, J. (1994) Effective waste management: Understanding and dealing with public concerns. Waste management & research, 12, pp. 207-222.
31. Petts, J. (1994) Hampshire County Council integrated waste strategy: case study of community consultation & involvement, Loughborough University of Technology, Centre for Hazard & Risk Management, Loughborough
32. Petts, J. (1995) Waste management strategy development: A case study of community involvement and consensus-building in Hampshire. Journal of environmental planning and management, 38:4, pp. 519-536.
33. Petts, J. (2001) Evaluating the effectiveness of deliberative processes: waste management case-studies. Journal of environmental planning and management, 44:2, pp. 207-226.
34. Petts, J. (2005) Enhancing environmental equity through decision-making: learning from waste management. Local environment, 10:4, pp. 397-409.
35. Petts, J. (2006) Managing public engagement to optimize learning: reflections from urban river restoration. Human ecology review, 13:2, pp. 172-181.
36. Petts, J. (2007) Learning about learning: Reflections on institutional and social engagement in urban river restoration. Geographical journal, 173:4, pp. 300-311.
37. Rose, N. (1999) Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought, Cambridge: University Press
38. Saiz, A. V. (2005) Globalisation, cosmopolitanism and ecological citizenship. Environmental politics, 14:2, pp. 163-178.
39. Seyfang, G. (2005) Shopping for sustainability: Can sustainable consumption promote ecological citizenship?. Environmental politics, 14:2, pp. 290-306.
40. Silverman, D. (2001) Interpreting qualitative data, Sage, London
41. Snary, C. (2002) Risk communication and the waste-to-energy incinerator environmental impact assessment process: A UK case study of public involvement. Journal of environmental planning and management, 45:2, pp. 267-283.
42. Stagl, S. (2006) Multicriteria evaluation and public participation: The case of UK energy policy. Land use policy, 23, pp. 53-62.
43. Tippett, J. et al. (2005) Social learning in public participation in river basin management-early findings from HarmoniCOP European case studies. Environmental science & policy, 8, pp. 287-299.
44. Webler, T., Kastenholz, H. and Renn, O. (1995) Public participation in impact assessment: A social learning perspective. Environmental impact assessment review, 15, pp. 443-463.
45. Wenger, E. and Snyder, W. M. (2000) Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard business review, pp. 139-145.
46. Wynne, B. (1992) Risk and social learning; reification to engagement. Social theories of risk, Praeger, London
47. Wynne, B. (1996) May the sheep safely graze. Risk, environment and modernity, Sage, London