Qualitative Comparative Analysis, Necessary Conditions, and Limited Diversity: Some Problematic Consequences of Schneider and Wagemann’s Enhanced Standard Analysis

Field Methods

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 300-315

  Cooper, Barry ^a   Glaesser, Judith ^a  

^a DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Coincidence Analysis; enhanced standard analysis; limited diversity; necessary conditions; Qualitative Comparative Analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84978100333     PISSN: 1525822X     EISSN: 15523969     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1525822X15598974     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. M.Baumgartner2012. Detecting causal chains in small-n data. Field Methods25:3–24.
2. M.Baumgartner2015. Parsimony and causality. Quality & Quantity49:839–56. doi:10.1007/s11135-014-0026-7.
3. B.Cooper2005. Applying Ragin’s crisp and fuzzy set QCA to large datasets: Social class and educational achievement in the National Child Development Study. Sociological Research Online10. http://www.socresonline.org.uk/10/2/cooper1.html(accessed March 3, 2015).
4. B.CooperJ.Glaesser. 2011a. Using case-based approaches to analyse large datasets: A comparison of Ragin’s fsQCA and fuzzy cluster analysis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology14:31–48.
5. B.CooperJ.Glaesser. 2011b. Paradoxes and pitfalls in using fuzzy set QCA: Illustrations from a critical review of a study of educational inequality. Sociological Research Online16. http://www.socresonline.org.uk/16/3/8.html (accessed March 3, 2015).
6. B.CooperJ.Glaesser. 2012a. Qualitative work and the testing and development of theory: Lessons from a study combining cross-case and within-case analysis via Ragin’s QCA. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research13. http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1776/3354(accessed March 3, 2015).
7. B.CooperJ.Glaesser. 2012b. Set theoretic versus correlational methods: The case of ability and educational achievement. In Challenging the Qualitative–Quantitative Divide: Explorations in Case-focused Causal Analysis, eds., 170–207. London: Continuum.
8. B.CooperJ.Glaesser. 2015. Analysing necessity and sufficiency with Qualitative Comparative Analysis: How do results vary as case weights change?Quality & Quantity. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11135-014-0151-3. doi:10.1007/s11135-014-0151-3.
9. B.CooperJ.GlaesserS.Thomson. 2014. Schneider and Wagemann’s proposed enhanced standard analysis for Ragin’s Qualitative Comparative Analysis: Some unresolved problems and some suggestions for addressing them. COMPASSS WP Series 2014–77. http://www.compasss.org/wpseries/CooperGlaesserThomson2014.pdf. (accessed March 3, 2015).
10. J.GlaesserB.Cooper. 2011. Selectivity and flexibility in the German secondary school system: A configurational analysis of recent data from the German Socio-Economic Panel. European Sociological Review27:570–85.
11. J.GlaesserB.Cooper. 2012. Gender, parental education, and ability: Their interacting roles in predicting GCSE success. Cambridge Journal of Education42:463–80.
12. J.GlaesserB.Cooper. 2014. Exploring the consequences of a recalibration of causal conditions when assessing sufficiency with fuzzy set QCA. International Journal of Social Research Methodology17:387–401.
13. C.C.Ragin1987. The Comparative Method. Moving beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
14. C.C.Ragin2000. Fuzzy-set Social Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. C.C.Ragin2008. Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and beyond. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16. C.C.RaginK.A.DrassS.Davey. 2006. Fuzzy-set/Qualitative Comparative Analysis. 2nd ed. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
17. C.C.RaginJ.Sonnett. 2005. Between complexity and parsimony: Limited diversity, counterfactual cases, and comparative analysis. In Vergleichen in der Politikwissenschaft, eds., 180–97. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
18. C.Q.SchneiderC.Wagemann. 2012. Set-theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. C.Q.SchneiderC.Wagemann. 2013. Doing justice to logical remainders in QCA: Moving beyond the standard analysis. Political Research Quarterly66:211–20.
20. O.S.Stokke2004. Boolean analysis, mechanisms, and the study of regime effectiveness. In Regime Consequences: Methodological Challenges and Research Strategies, eds., 87–119. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
21. O.S.Stokke2007. Qualitative comparative analysis, shaming, and international regime effectiveness. Journal of Business Research60:501–11.
22. A.Thiem2014. Navigating the complexities of qualitative comparative analysis: Case numbers, necessity relations, and model ambiguities. Evaluation Review38:487–513.