-
1
-
-
55449087440
-
Preimplantation genetic testing: a practice committee opinion
-
Practice Committees of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technologies and American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Preimplantation genetic testing: a practice committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:S136-43.
-
(2008)
Fertil Steril
, vol.90
, pp. S136-S143
-
-
-
2
-
-
78650698933
-
European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) PGD Consortium
-
Harton G, Braude P, Lashwood A, Schmutzler A, Treger-Synodinos J, Wilton L, Harper JC European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) PGD Consortium. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:14-24.
-
(2011)
Hum Reprod
, vol.26
, pp. 14-24
-
-
Harton, G.1
Braude, P.2
Lashwood, A.3
Schmutzler, A.4
Treger-Synodinos, J.5
Wilton, L.6
Harper, J.C.7
-
3
-
-
46649109735
-
The current status of preimplantation genetic screening: British fertility society policy and practice guidelines
-
Anderson RA, Pickering S. The current status of preimplantation genetic screening: British fertility society policy and practice guidelines. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2008;11:71-5.
-
(2008)
Hum Fertil (Camb)
, vol.11
, pp. 71-75
-
-
Anderson, R.A.1
Pickering, S.2
-
4
-
-
79958734907
-
Preimplantation genetic screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis
-
Mastenbroek S, Twisk M, van der Veen F, Repping S. Preimplantation genetic screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2011;17:454-546.
-
(2011)
Hum Reprod
, vol.17
, pp. 454-546
-
-
Mastenbroek, S.1
Twisk, M.2
Veen, F.3
Repping, S.4
-
6
-
-
84899064604
-
Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) still in search of a clinical application: a systematic review
-
Gleicher N, Kushnir VA, Barad DH. Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) still in search of a clinical application: a systematic review. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014;12:22.
-
(2014)
Reprod Biol Endocrinol
, vol.12
, pp. 22
-
-
Gleicher, N.1
Kushnir, V.A.2
Barad, D.H.3
-
7
-
-
84906084802
-
Preimplantation genetic screening: back to the future
-
Mastenbroek S, Repping S. Preimplantation genetic screening: back to the future. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:1846-50.
-
(2014)
Hum Reprod
, vol.29
, pp. 1846-1850
-
-
Mastenbroek, S.1
Repping, S.2
-
8
-
-
84945569993
-
Comprehensive chromosome screening improves embryo selection: a meta-analysis
-
Dahdouh EM, Balayla J, García-Velasco JA. Comprehensive chromosome screening improves embryo selection: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2015;104:1503-12.
-
(2015)
Fertil Steril
, vol.104
, pp. 1503-1512
-
-
Dahdouh, E.M.1
Balayla, J.2
García-Velasco, J.A.3
-
9
-
-
84962172996
-
Effectiveness of in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening: a reanalysis of United States assisted reproductive technology data 2011-2012
-
[Epub ahead of print].
-
Kushnir VA, Darmon SK, Albertini DF, Barad DH, Gleicher N. Effectiveness of in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening: a reanalysis of United States assisted reproductive technology data 2011-2012. Fertil Steril. 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.026. [Epub ahead of print].
-
(2016)
Fertil Steril
-
-
Kushnir, V.A.1
Darmon, S.K.2
Albertini, D.F.3
Barad, D.H.4
Gleicher, N.5
-
10
-
-
84977662049
-
Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology
-
Glujovsky D, Blake D, Bardach A, Farquhar C. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev. 2012, Issue 7. Art. No.: CD002118.
-
(2012)
Cochrane Database of Syst Rev
, Issue.7
-
-
Glujovsky, D.1
Blake, D.2
Bardach, A.3
Farquhar, C.4
-
11
-
-
84894424408
-
The nature of aneuploidy with increasing age of the female partner: a review of 15,169 consecutive trophectoderm biopsies evaluated with comprehensive chromosomal screening
-
Franasiak JM, Forman EJ, Hong KH, Werner MD, Upham KM, Treff NR, Scott RT Jr. The nature of aneuploidy with increasing age of the female partner: a review of 15,169 consecutive trophectoderm biopsies evaluated with comprehensive chromosomal screening. Fertil Steril. 2014;101:656-63.
-
(2014)
Fertil Steril
, vol.101
, pp. 656-663
-
-
Franasiak, J.M.1
Forman, E.J.2
Hong, K.H.3
Werner, M.D.4
Upham, K.M.5
Treff, N.R.6
Scott, R.T.7
-
12
-
-
84975176984
-
Should pre-implantation genetic screening be implemented to routine clinical practice?
-
Orvieto R, Shuly Y, Brengauz M, Feldman B. Should pre-implantation genetic screening be implemented to routine clinical practice? Gynecol Endocrinol. 2016;12:1-3 [Epub ahead of print].
-
(2016)
Gynecol Endocrinol
, vol.12
, pp. 1-3
-
-
Orvieto, R.1
Shuly, Y.2
Brengauz, M.3
Feldman, B.4
-
13
-
-
84947763484
-
Healthy babies after intrauterine transfer of mosaic aneuploid blastocysts
-
Greco E, Minasi MG, Fiorentino F. Healthy babies after intrauterine transfer of mosaic aneuploid blastocysts. N Engl J Med. 2015;73:2089-90.
-
(2015)
N Engl J Med
, vol.73
, pp. 2089-2090
-
-
Greco, E.1
Minasi, M.G.2
Fiorentino, F.3
-
14
-
-
84962417383
-
2013 assisted reproductive technology national summary report
-
Atlanta: US Dept of Health and Human Services
-
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. 2013 assisted reproductive technology national summary report. Atlanta: US Dept of Health and Human Services; 2015.
-
(2015)
-
-
-
15
-
-
77954982991
-
Joint society of obstetricians and gynaecologists of Canada-Canadian fertility and andrology society clinical practice guidelines committee.Elective single embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization
-
Min JK, Hughes E, Young D, Gysler M, Hemmings R, Cheung AP, Goodrow GJ, Senikas V, Wong BC, Sierra S, Carranza-Mamane B, Case A, Dwyer C, Graham J, Havelock J, Lee F, Liu K, Vause T. Joint society of obstetricians and gynaecologists of Canada-Canadian fertility and andrology society clinical practice guidelines committee.Elective single embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010;32:363-77.
-
(2010)
J Obstet Gynaecol Can
, vol.32
, pp. 363-377
-
-
Min, J.K.1
Hughes, E.2
Young, D.3
Gysler, M.4
Hemmings, R.5
Cheung, A.P.6
Goodrow, G.J.7
Senikas, V.8
Wong, B.C.9
Sierra, S.10
Carranza-Mamane, B.11
Case, A.12
Dwyer, C.13
Graham, J.14
Havelock, J.15
Lee, F.16
Liu, K.17
Vause, T.18
-
16
-
-
84883457543
-
Cleavage-stage biopsy significantly impairs human embryonic implantation potential while blastocyst biopsy does not: a randomized and paired clinical trial
-
Scott Jr RT, Upham KM, Forman EJ, Zhao T, Treff NR. Cleavage-stage biopsy significantly impairs human embryonic implantation potential while blastocyst biopsy does not: a randomized and paired clinical trial. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:624-30.
-
(2013)
Fertil Steril
, vol.100
, pp. 624-630
-
-
Scott, R.T.1
Upham, K.M.2
Forman, E.J.3
Zhao, T.4
Treff, N.R.5
-
17
-
-
84883453649
-
Blastocyst biopsy with comprehensive chromosome screening and fresh embryo transfer significantly increases in vitro fertilization implantation and delivery rates: a randomized controlled trial
-
Scott Jr RT, Upham KM, Forman EJ, Hong KH, Scott KL, Taylor D, Tao X, Treff NR. Blastocyst biopsy with comprehensive chromosome screening and fresh embryo transfer significantly increases in vitro fertilization implantation and delivery rates: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:697-703.
-
(2013)
Fertil Steril
, vol.100
, pp. 697-703
-
-
Scott, R.T.1
Upham, K.M.2
Forman, E.J.3
Hong, K.H.4
Scott, K.L.5
Taylor, D.6
Tao, X.7
Treff, N.R.8
|